Development of sub-daily erosion and sediment transport algorithms for SWAT

Transactions of the ASABE

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1685-1691

  Jeong, J ^a   Kannan, N ^a   Arnold, J G ^b   Glick, R ^c   Gosselink, L ^d   Srinivasan, R ^b   Harmel, R D ^b  

^a BLACKLAND RESEARCH AND EXTENSION CENTER   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^c Watershed Protection and Development Review   (United States)

^d TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Sediment; Soil erosion; Sub daily; SWAT; Watershed modeling

Indexed keywords

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; DAILY OUTPUT; DETENTION BASIN; EROSION PROCESS; FIELD OBSERVATIONS; FLOW MODEL; INSTANTANEOUS FLOW; IRRIGATION SYSTEMS; MEASURED DATA; MODIFIED UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATIONS; NONPOINT SOURCES; OVERLAND FLOW; PHYSICALLY BASED; PHYSICALLY-BASED EROSION MODEL; SEDIMENT LOADS; SEDIMENT STRUCTURES; SEDIMENT YIELDS; SEDIMENT-ROUTING; SMALL WATERSHEDS; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; SOIL EROSION; SOIL LOSS; SOIL LOSS EQUATIONS; SOIL-EROSION MODEL; SPLASH EROSION; STORMWATER BMPS; STORMWATERS; SUB-DAILY; SWAT; SWAT MODEL; SWAT2005; TIME STEP; TRANSPORT ALGORITHMS; UPLAND AREA; URBAN WATERSHED; WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENTS; WATERSHED MODELING;

ALGORITHMS; ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EROSION; LAKES; LANDFORMS; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENTOLOGY; SEDIMENTS; SOILS; WATER FILTRATION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

ALGORITHM; ASSESSMENT METHOD; BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; DATA SET; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FILTRATION; FLOW MODELING; IRRIGATION; KINETIC ENERGY; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; SEDIMENT POLLUTION; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENTATION; SOIL EROSION; STORMWATER; THEORETICAL STUDY; URBAN AREA; WATERSHED;

TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 81755163518     PISSN: 21510032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allen, P., R. D. Harmel, J. Arnold, B. Plant, J. Yelderman, and K. King. 2005. Field data and flow system response in clay (vertisol) shale terrain, north central Texas, USA. Hydrol. Proc. 19(14): 2719-2736. (Pubitemid 41358720)
2. Ammon, D. C. 1978. Urban stormwater pollutant buildup and washoff relationships. MS thesis. Gainesville, Fla.: University of Florida.
3. Arnold, J. G., J. Williams, A. Nicks, and N. Sammons. 1990. SWRRB: A Basin-Scale Simulation Model for Soil and Water Resources Management. College Station, Tex.: Texas A&M University Press.
4. Arnold, J., K. Potter, K. King, and P. Allen. 2005. Estimation of soil cracking and the effect on surface runoff in a Texas Blackland Prairie watershed. Hydrol. Proc. 19(3): 589-603. (Pubitemid 40289983)
5. Bagnold, R. 1977. Bed load transport by natural rivers. Water Resources Res. 13(2): 303-312.
6. Bingner, R. L., and F. D. Theurer. 2001. AnnAGNPS technical processes: Documentation version 2. Unpublished report. Oxford, Miss.: USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory.
7. Brandt, C. J. 1990. Simulation of the size distribution and erosivity of raindrops and throughfall drops. Earth Surface Proc. and Landforms 15(8): 687-698.
8. Brownlie, W. 1982. Prediction of flow depth and sediment discharge in open channels. PhD diss. Pasadena, Cal.: California Institute of Technology.
9. Harmel, R. D., C. W. Richardson, K. W. King, and P. M. Allen. 2006. Runoff and soil loss relationships for the Texas Blackland Prairie ecoregion. J. Hydrol. 331(3-4): 471-483. (Pubitemid 44709044)
10. Harmel, R. D, J. Bonta, and C. Richardson. 2007. The original USDA-ARS experimental watersheds in Texas and Ohio: Contributions from the past and visions for the future. Trans. ASABE 50(5): 1669-1675. (Pubitemid 350125105)
11. Huber, W. C., R. E. Dickinson, and T. O. Barnwell Jr. 1988. Storm water management model. Version 4. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
12. Jeong, J., N. Kannan, J. Arnold, R. Glick, L. Gosselink, and R. Srinivasan. 2010. Development and integration of sub-hourly rainfall-runoff modeling capability within a watershed model. Water Resources Mgmt. 24(15): 4505-4527.
13. King, K. W., J. G. Arnold, and R. L. Bingner. 1999. Comparison of Green-Ampt and curve number methods on Goodwin Creek watershed using SWAT. Trans. ASAE 42(4): 919-925. (Pubitemid 30257990)
14. Laflen, J. M., L. J. Lane, and G. R. Foster. 1991. WEPP: A new generation of erosion prediction technology. J. Soil and Water Cons. 46(1): 34-38.
15. Morgan, R. P. C., J. N. Quinton, R. E. Smith, G. Govers, J. W. A. Poesen, K. Auerswald, G. Chisci, D. Torri, and M. E. Styczen. 1998. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): A dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surface Proc. and Landforms 23(6): 527-544. (Pubitemid 28444034)
16. Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 50(3): 885-900. (Pubitemid 47074809)
17. Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part I. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10(3): 282-290.
18. Neitsch, S. L., J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, and J. R. Williams. 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation. Temple, Tex.: Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory.
19. Park, S. W., J. K. Mitchell, and J. N. Scarborough. 1982. Soil erosion simulation on small watersheds: A modified ANSWERS model. Trans. ASAE 25(6): 1581-1588.
20. Richardson, E., D. Simons, and P. Lagasse. 2001. River Engineering for Highway Encroachments: Highways in the River Environment. Publication No. FHWA NHI 01-004. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
21. Sivapalan, M., N. Viney, C. Zammit, V. Singh, and D. Frevert. 2002. LASCAM: Large-scale catchment model. In Mathematical Models of Large Watershed Hydrology, 579-648.Highlands Ranch, Colo.: Water Resources Publications.
22. Torri, D., M. Sfalanga, and M. Del Sette. 1987. Splash detachment: Runoff depth and soil cohesion. Catena 14(1-3): 149-155.
23. van Griensven, A., and T. Meixner. 2003. LH-OAT Sensitivity Analysis Tool. Tucson, Ariz.: University of Arizona, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources. Available at: Http://sahra. arizona.edu/cgi-bin/hydroware/hydroware. pl?mode=displayCat&CAT1=4&CAT2=4.
24. Williams, J. 1975. Sediment-yield prediction with universal equation using runoff energy factor. In Proc. Sediment Yield Workshop: Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yields and Sources, 244-252. Washington, D.C.: USDA-ARS.
25. Wischmeier, W. 1975. Estimating the soil loss equation's cover and management factor for undisturbed areas. In Proc. Sediment Yield Workshop: Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yield and Sources, 118-124. Washington, D.C.: USDA-ARS.
26. Wischmeier, W., and D. Smith. 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning. Washington, D.C.: USDA Science and Education Administration.
27. Yang, C. 1996. Sediment Transport: Theory and Practice. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.