Stormwater control measure (SCM) design standards to limit stream erosion for Piedmont North Carolina

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 411, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 185-196

  Tillinghast, E D ^a   Hunt, W F ^a   Jennings, G D ^a  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Erosional hours; Sediment transport; Stormwater control measures; Stream erosion; Stream geomorphology; SWMM 5.0

Indexed keywords

EROSIONAL HOURS; STORMWATER CONTROL; STREAM EROSION; STREAM GEOMORPHOLOGY; SWMM 5.0;

ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); CATCHMENTS; DESIGN; EROSION; LAKES; LANDFORMS; RUNOFF; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; STORM SEWERS; STORMS; STREAM FLOW; WATERSHEDS;

STANDARDS;

BEDLOAD; BENCHMARKING; CROSS SECTION; DESIGN METHOD; DISCHARGE; EROSION CONTROL; PEAK FLOW; STANDARD (REGULATION); STORMWATER; STREAMFLOW; URBANIZATION; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED;

NORTH CAROLINA; PIEDMONT [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 81555219297     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.09.027     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bledsoe B.P. Stream erosion potential and stormwater management strategies. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. - ASCE 2002, 128(6):451-455.
2. Bledsoe B.P., Watson C.C. Effects of urbanization on channel instability. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2001, 37(2):255-270.
3. Booth D.B., Jackson C.R. Urbanization of aquatic systems: degradation thresholds, stormwater detention, and the limits of mitigation. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1997, 30:1077-1090.
4. Chow V.T. Open Channel Hydraulics 1959, Elsevier, Burlington.
5. Clinton, D.R., 2001. Stream Morphology Relationships from Reference Streams in North Carolina. MS Thesis, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Raleigh, NC.
6. Computational Hydraulics International (CHI), 2009. PC Storm Water Management Model (PCSWMM) for Windows. Ver. 2009. Ontario, Canada.
7. Doll A.B., Wise-Frederick D.E., Buckner C.M., Wilkerson S.D., Harman W.A., Smith R.E., Spooner J. Hydraulic geometry relationships for urban streams throughout the piedmont of North Carolina. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2002, 38(3):641-651.
8. Doyle Martin W., Shields F.D. Incorporation of bed texture into a channel evolution model. Geomorphology 2000, 34(2000):291-309.
9. DuBoys P. Le Rhone et les Rivieres a Lit Affouillable. Ann Ponts Chaussees 1879, 18(Series 5):141-195.
10. Duvert C., Gratiot N., Evard O., Navratil O., Nemery J., Prat C., Esteves M. Drivers of erosion and sediment transport in three headwater catchments of the Mexican Central Highlands. Geomorphology 2010, 123(2010):243-256.
11. Einstein, H.A., 1950. The Bed-load Function for Sediment Transportation in Open Channel Flows. Technical Bulletin 1026, US Dept. of the Army, Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
12. Faustini J.M., Kaufmann P.R., Herlihy A.T. Downstream variation in bankfull width of wadeable streams across the conterminous United States. Geomorphology 2009, 108(3-4):292-311.
13. Grable J.L., Harden C.P. Geomorphic response of an Appalachian valley and ridge stream to urbanization. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 2006, 31:1707-1720.
14. Hammer, T.R., 1972. Stream Channel Enlargement due to Urbanization. Regional Science Research Institute Discussion Paper Series, No. 55. Philadelphia, PA, 41 pp.
15. Henshaw P.C., Booth D.B. Natural restabilization of stream channels in urban watersheds. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2000, 36:1219-1236.
16. Hey R.D., Thorne C.R. Stable channels with mobile gravel beds. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1986, 112(8):671.
17. Hollis G.E. The effect of urbanization on floods of different recurrence interval. Water Resour. Res. 1975, 11:431-435.
18. James W. Rules for Responsible Modeling 2005, Computational Hydraulic International, Guelph, Ontario. fourth ed.
19. Julien P. Erosion and Sedimentation 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. second ed.
20. Kasai M., Page G.J., Marutani M.J., Trustrum N.A. Impacts of land use change on patterns of sediment flux in Weraamaia catchment, New Zealand. Catena 2005, 64(1):27-60.
21. LeBland, B. 1999. Wake County Roads. (accessed 20.09.10). http://www.wakecountyroads.com/index.html.
22. Lee, K.B., Ham, P.J., 1988. Effects of Surrey's storm water management policy on channel erosion. In: Proceedings, International Symposium on Urban Hydrology and Municipal Engineering, Town of Markham, Ontario, Canada, pp. C5-1-C5-15.
23. Leopold, L.B., 1968. Hydrology for Urban Land Planning - A Guidebook on the Hydrologic Effects of Urban Land Use. Geological Survey Circular, No. 55.
24. Lowther, B., 2008. Stream Channel Geomorphology Relationships for North Carolina Piedmont Reference Reaches. MS Thesis, North Carolina State University, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Raleigh, NC.
25. MacRae C.R. Experience from morphological research on Canadian streams is control of the two-year frequency the best basis for stream channel protection?. Proceedings of the Engineering Foundation Conference 1996, 144-162. ASCE, NY, NY. L.A. Roesner (Ed.).
26. May, C.W., 1998. The cumulative effects of urbanization on small streams in the Puget Sound lowland eco-region. In: PSWQA Puget Sound Research '98I. Conference Proceedings, Seattle, Washington.
27. Meyer-Peter, E., Muller, R., 1948. Formulas for bedload transport. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Congress, IAHR, Stockholm, pp. 39-64.
28. Millar R.G. Theoretical regime equations for mobile gravel-bed rivers with stable banks. Geomorphology 2005, 64(3-4):207-220.
29. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2007. National Engineering Handbook (NEH). 210-VI, Part 654 (NRCS Stream Restoration Design).
30. Navratil O., Albert M., Herouin E., Gresillon J. Determination of bankfull discharge magnitude and frequency: comparison of methods on 16 gravel-bed river reaches. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 2006, 31(11):1345-1363.
31. Nehrke S.M., Roesner L.A. Effects of design practice for flood control and best management practices on the flow-frequency curve. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. - ASCE 2004, 130(2):131-139.
32. Neil, C.R., 1968. A Reexaminataion of the Beginning of Movement for Coarse Granular Bed Materials. Report INT 68, Hydraulics Research Station, Wallingford, UK.
33. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), Division of Water Management, 2004. New Jersey Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual, Trenton, NJ. (accessed 01.10.10). http://www.state.nj.us/dep/stormwater/bmp_manual/NJ%20SWBMP%20covson%20CD.pdf.
34. Niezgoda S.L., Johnson P.A. Improving the urban stream restoration effort: identifying critical form and processes relationships. Environ. Manage. 2005, 35(5):579-592.
35. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality, 2007. Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual, Raleigh, NC. (accessed 18.11.09). http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/documents/BMPManual_WholeDocument_CoverRevisedDec2007.pdf.
36. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). NCDOT GIS Data Layers. (accessed 09.03.11). http://www.ncdot.gov/it/gis/DataDistribution/DOTData/default.html.
37. North Carolina State Climate Office (NCSCO), 2003. NC Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the Southeast Database, Raleigh, NC. (accessed 20.08.10). http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/cronos.
38. North Carolina State University Club (NCSUC), 2006. NC State University Club, Raleigh, NC. (accessed 20.08.10). http://www.ncsuclub.com/fw/main/Home-1.html.
39. Parker Gary Hydraulic geometry of active gravel rivers. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1979, 105(9):1185-1201.
40. Parker, Gary, 2008. Transport of gravel and sediment mixtures. In: Garcia, M.H. (Ed.), ASCE Manuals No. 110 Sedimentation Engineering: Process, Measurements, Modeling, and Practice. ASCE, Reston, Virginia, pp. 165-263 (Chapter 3).
41. Pizzuto J.E., Hession W.C., McBride M. Comparing gravel-bed rivers in paired urban and rural catchments of southeastern Pennsylvania. Geology 2000, 28(1):79-82.
42. Pomeroy C.A., Postel N.A., O'Neill P.A., Roesner L.A. Development of storm-water management design criteria to maintain geomorphic stability in Kansas City metropolitan area streams. J. Irrigat. Drain. Eng. - ASCE 2008, 134(5):562-566.
43. Rhoads B.L. Stream power: a unifying theme for urban fluvial geomorphology. Stormwater Runoff and Receiving Systems: Impact, Monitoring, and Assessment 1991, 65-74. CRC Press, Baton Rouge, LA, (Chapter 5). E.E. Herricks (Ed.).
44. RIVERMorph. 2007. Features. 2002-2007. RIVERMorph, LLC. (accessed 08.08.10). http://www.rivermorph.com/detail/.
45. Robinson, A.M., 1976. The effects of urbanization on stream channel morphology. In: Presented at the National Symposium on Urban Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Sediment Control, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, pp. 115-127.
46. Roesner L.A., Bledsoe B.P., Brashear R.W. Are best-management-practice criteria really environmentally friendly?. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. - ASCE 2001, 127(3):150-154.
47. Rohrer C.A., Roesner L.A. Matching the critical portion of the flow duration curve to minimize changes in modeled excess shear. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54(6-7):347-354.
48. Rosgen, D.L., 1996. Applied River Morphology. Printed Media Companies, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 350 pp.
49. Rossman, L., 2009. Storm Water Management Model User's Manual Version 5.0. Environmental Protection Agency Handbook. USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio.
50. Schumm S.A. The Fluvial System 1977, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
51. Schumm S.A., Harvey M.D., Watson C.C. Incised Channels: Morphology, Dynamics, and Control 1984, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO.
52. Shields, I.A., 1936. Anwendung der ahnlichkeitmechanik und der turbulenzforschung auf die gescheibebewegung. Mitteilungen Preussischen Versuchsanstalt fur Wasserbau und Schiffbau, vol. 26, Berlin, Germany.
53. Siegle, D., 2009. Is There a Relationship (Difference) or Isn't There a Relationship (Difference)?: 14 October 2009. University of Connecticut (UCONN), Storrs, CT. (accessed 01.10.10). http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/research/correlation/alphaleve.htm.
54. Simon, A., 1994 Gradation Processes and Channel Evolution in Modified West Tennessee Streams: Process, Response and Form. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1470, Washington, DC.
55. Skipper, G., 2008. Watershed-Scale Stormwater Monitoring of a Mixed Land Use Watershed in the North Carolina Piedmont. MS Thesis, North Carolina State University, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Raleigh, NC.
56. Trainor K., Church M. Quantify in variability in stream channel morphology. Water Resour. Res. 2003, (39):1248-1260.
57. United Nations, 2008. World Urbanization Prospects: 2007. UN-Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York. (accessed 20.04.10). http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wup2007/2007WUP_Highlights_web.pdf.
58. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2009. Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) User's Manual. Ver. 5.0. Cincinnati, Ohio.
59. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (VADCR) Division of Soil and Water Conservation, 1999. Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, Richmond, VA. #vswmhnbk (accessed 26.09.10). http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/soil_and_water/stormwat.shtml.
60. Walsh C.J., Fletcher T.D., Ladson A.R. Retention capacity: a metric to link stream ecology and stormwater management. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2009, 14(4):399-406.
61. Wasson R.J., Mazari R.K., Starr B., Clifton G. The recent history of erosion and sedimentation on the Southern Tablelands of southeastern Australia: sediment flux dominated by channel incision. Geomorphology 1998, 24:291-308.
62. Wolman M.G. A cycle of sedimentation and erosion in urban river channels. Geografiska Annaler 1967, 46A:385-395.