What has changed in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Poland in 2003-2009? Data from the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS)

Kardiologia Polska

Volumn 69, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1109-1118

  Poloński, Lech ^a   Ga̧sior, Mariusz ^a   Gierlotka, Marek ^a   Wilczek, Krzysztof ^a   Kalarus, Zbigniew ^a   Dubiel, Jacek ^b   Ruzyłło, Witold ^c   Banasiak, Waldemar ^d   Opolski, Grzegorz ^e   Zembala, Marian ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Poland)

^c INSTITUTE OF CARDIOLOGY   (Poland)

^d 4TH MILITARY HOSPITAL   (Poland)

^e MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

12 month mortality; Primary percutaneous coronary intervention; ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; Temporal trends; Treatment strategy

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CLOPIDOGREL; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; NITRATE; STATINE;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOT LYSIS; CARDIAC PATIENT; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; DISEASE REGISTRY; ELDERLY CARE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE REPERFUSION; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; LUNG EDEMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POLAND; POLISH REGISTRY OF ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; SEX DIFFERENCE; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; SURVIVAL TIME; THERAPY DELAY;

EID: 81555210944     PISSN: 00229032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Widimsky P, Wijns W, Fajadet J et al. Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries. Eur Heart J, 2010; 31: 943-957.
2. Poloński L, Ga̧sior M, Gierlotka M et al. Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS). Characteristics treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Poland. Kardiol Pol, 2007; 65: 861-872. (Pubitemid 47607833)
3. Flynn MR, Barrett C, Cosío FG et al. The Cardiology Audit and Registration Data Standards (CARDS), European data standards for clinical cardiology practice. Eur Heart J, 2005; 26: 308-313. (Pubitemid 40227433)
4. Peterson ED, Shah BR, Parsons L et al. Trends in quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Heart J, 2008; 156: 1045-1055.
5. Schiele F, Hochadel M, Tubaro M et al. Reperfusion strategy in Europe: temporal trends in performance measures for reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J, 2010; 31: 2614-2624.
6. Steg PhG, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM et al. Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Am J Cardiol, 2002; 90: 358-363.
7. Ostrzycki A, Sosnowski C, Borowiec-Kacańda A et al. Pre-hospital delay of treatment in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: experience of cardiac centre located in the vicinity of the centre of Warsaw. Kardiol Pol, 2008; 66: 609-614.
8. Dudek D, Legutko J, Siudak Z et al. Organizacja interwencyjnego leczenia pacjentów z zawałem serca STEMI i NSTEMI w Polsce. Kardiol Pol, 2010; 68: 618-624.
9. Karcz M, Bekta P, Skwarek M et al. Rozpowszechnienie teletransmisji EKG w przedszpitalnym postȩpowaniu z chorymi z podejrzeniem ostrego zawału serca - efekty programu pilotażowego POLKARD na wschodnim Mazowszu. Post Kardiol Interw, 2006; 2: 274-280.
10. Perkins-Porras L, Whitehead DL, Strike PC et al. Pre-hospital delay in patients with acute coronary syndrome: factors associated with patient decision time and home-to-hospital delay. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2009; 8: 26-33.
11. Bett N, Tonkin AM, Thompson PL et al. Failure of current public educational campaigns to impact on the initial response of patients with possible heart attack. Intern Med J, 2005; 35: 279-282. (Pubitemid 40676832)
12. Boersma E. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J, 2006; 27: 779-788.
13. Doorey A, Patel S, Reese C et al. Dangers of delay of initiation of either thrombolysis or primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with increasing use of primary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol, 1998; 81: 1173-1177. (Pubitemid 28226124)
14. Lambert L, Brown K, Segal E et al. Association between timeliness of reperfusion therapy and clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA, 2010; 3030: 2148-2155.
15. Goodman SG, Huang W, Yan AT et al. The expanded Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events: baseline characteristics, management practices, and hospital outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J, 2009; 158: 193-201.
16. Di Chiara A, Chiarella F, Savonitto S et al. Epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction in the Italian CCU network. The BLITZ study. Eur Heart J, 2003; 24: 1616-1629. (Pubitemid 37174901)
17. Ga̧sior M, Słonka G, Wilczek K et al. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive treatment strategies in older patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes: PL-ACS). Am J Cardiol, 2011; 107: 30-36.