Prediction of developmental performance in preterm infants at two years of corrected age: Contribution of the neurological assessment at term age

Early Human Development

Volumn 87, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 799-804

  Simard, Marie Noëlle ^a,b   Lambert, Jean ^c   Lachance, Christian ^c,d   Audibert, François ^c   Gosselin, Julie ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amiel Tison neurological assessment at term; Bayley Scales of Infant Development II; Developmental outcome; Infants at risk; Preterm infants

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYLEY SCALE OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT II; BIRTH WEIGHT; DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEWBORN; PREDICTION; PREMATURITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RATING SCALE;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; MALE; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 81455158990     PISSN: 03783782     EISSN: 18726232     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen M.C. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants. Curr Opin Neurol 2008, 21:123-128.
2. Aylward G.P. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants born prematurely. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2005, 26:427-440.
3. Msall M.E., Limperopoulos C., Park J.J. Neuroimaging and cerebral palsy in children. Minerva Pediatr 2009, 61:415-424.
4. Rademaker K.J., Uiterwaal C.S., Beek F.J., Lieftink A.F., Groenendaal F., Grobbee D.E., et al. Neonatal cranial ultrasound versus MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome at school age in children born preterm. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005, 90:F489-F493.
5. Raju T.N. Epidemiology of late preterm (near-term) births. Clin Perinatol 2006, 33:751-763.
6. Engle W.A., Tomashek K.M., Wallman C. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. "Late-preterm" infants: a population at risk. Pediatrics 2007, 120:1390-1401.
7. Raju T.N. The problem of late-preterm (near-term) births: a workshop summary. Pediatr Res 2006, 60:775-776.
8. Raju T.N., Higgins R.D., Stark A.R., Leveno K.J. Optimizing care and outcome for late-preterm (near-term) infants: a summary of the workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Pediatrics 2006, 118:1207-1214.
9. Tomashek K.M., Shapiro-Mendoza C.K., Davidoff M.J., Petrini J.R. Differences in mortality between late-preterm and term singleton infants in the United States, 1995-2002. J Pediatr 2007, 151:450-456.
10. Escobar G.J., Clark R.H., Greene J.D. Short-term outcomes of infants born at 35 and 36weeks gestation: we need to ask more questions. Semin Perinatol 2006, 30:28-33.
11. Jain S., Cheng J. Emergency department visits and rehospitalizations in late preterm infants. Clin Perinatol 2006, 33:935-945.
12. Amiel-Tison C., Gosselin J. The Amiel-Tison and Gosselin Neurological Assessment and its correlations with disorders of higher cerebral function. Developmental disabilities in infancy and childhood 2007, 321-331. Paul H Brookes, Baltimore, MD. 3rd ed. P.J. Accardo (Ed.).
13. Gosselin J., Gahagan S., Amiel-Tison C. The Amiel-Tison neurological assessment at term: conceptual and methodological continuity in the course of follow-up. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2005, 11:34-51.
14. Amiel-Tison C. Update of the Amiel-Tison neurologic assessment for the term neonate or at 40weeks corrected age. Pediatr Neurol 2002, 27:196-212.
15. Amiel-Tison C., Gosselin J. From neonatal neurology: some clues for interpreting fetal findings. Donald Sch J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008, 2:48-63.
16. Deschênes G., Gosselin J., Couture M., Lachance C. Interobserver reliability of the Amiel-Tison neurological assessment at term. Pediatr Neurol 2004, 30:190-194.
17. Simard M.N., Lambert J., Lachance C., Audibert F., Gosselin J. Interexaminer reliability of Amiel-Tison Neurological Assessments. Pediatr Neurol 2009, 41:347-352.
18. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development - Second Edition 1993, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
19. Gosselin J., Fouron J.C., Amiel-Tison C. Uteroplacental insufficiency and neurodevelopmental outcome. Neoreviews 2006, 7:e202-e207.
20. Amiel-Tison C., Gosselin J. The Amiel-Tison and Gosselin Neurological Assessment and its correlations with disorders of higher cerebral function. Developmental disabilities in infancy and childhood 2007, 321-331. Paul H Brookes, Baltimore. 3rd ed. P.J. Accardo (Ed.).
21. Aylward G.P. Cognitive and neuropsychological outcomes: more than IQ scores. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2002, 8:234-240.
22. Hintz S.R., Kendrick D.E., Vohr B.R., Poole K., Higgins R.D. NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Gender differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely preterm, extremely-low-birthweight infants. Acta Paediatr 2006, 95:1239-1248.
23. Paro-Panjan D., Neubauer D., Kodric J., Bratanic B. Amiel-Tison Neurological Assessment at term age: clinical application, correlation with other methods, and outcome at 12 and 15months. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005, 47:19-26.
24. Paro-Panjan D., Sustersic B., Neubauer D. Comparaison of two methods of neurologic assessment in infants. Pediatr Neurol 2005, 33:317-324.
25. Murray D.M., Bala P., O'Connor C.M., Ryan C.A., Connolly S., Boylan G.B. The predictive value of early neurological examination in neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy and neurodevelopmental outcome at 24months. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010, 52:e55-e59.