|
Volumn 20, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1011-1015
|
Comparisons of mouse models for hair follicle reconstitution
|
Author keywords
Chamber; Flap; Hair follicle; Patch; Reconstitution
|
Indexed keywords
ANIMAL CELL;
ANIMAL EXPERIMENT;
ANIMAL TISSUE;
ARTICLE;
CELL ASSAY;
CELL COUNT;
CELL CULTURE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
EPITHELIUM CELL;
FEMALE;
FIBROBLAST;
FOREIGN BODY GRANULOMA;
HAIR FOLLICLE;
HAIR FOLLICLE RECONSTITUTION;
HAIR PATCH ASSAY;
HAIR TRANSPLANTATION;
HISTOPATHOLOGY;
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY;
KERATINOCYTE;
MOUSE;
NEWBORN;
NONHUMAN;
SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;
SKIN CELL;
ANIMALS;
ANIMALS, NEWBORN;
CELL COUNT;
CELL TRANSPLANTATION;
CELLS, CULTURED;
CRYOPRESERVATION;
DERMIS;
FEMALE;
FIBROBLASTS;
HAIR;
HAIR FOLLICLE;
KERATINOCYTES;
MICE;
MICE, INBRED BALB C;
MICE, INBRED C3H;
MICE, INBRED C57BL;
MICE, NUDE;
MICE, TRANSGENIC;
MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING;
MODELS, ANIMAL;
SURGICAL FLAPS;
|
EID: 81455158744
PISSN: 09066705
EISSN: 16000625
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01366.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (23)
|
References (26)
|