Acute and 16-month outcomes of a new stent: The first-in-man evaluation of the medtronic S9 (integrity) stent

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 898-908

  Lee, Stephen Wai Luen ^a   Chan, Michael P H ^a   Chan, Kelvin K W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

continuous sinusoidal technology; integrity stent; very deliverable stent

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTERIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BARE METAL STENT; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFORMABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; DELIVERABILITY; DEVICE RECALL; DEVICE SAFETY; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FEMALE; FLEXIBILITY; FOLLOW UP; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIAL ARTERY; THERAPY EFFECT; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HONG KONG; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 81455154358     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23267     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Gershlick AH,. Role of stenting in coronary revascularization. Heart 2001; 86: 104-112.
2. Roubin GS, Cannon AD, Agrawal SK, et al. Intracoronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1992; 85: 916-927.
3. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1996; 94: 1247-1254. (Pubitemid 26307249)
4. Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: Classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 1999; 100: 1872-1878. (Pubitemid 29511140)
5. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1315-1323. (Pubitemid 37186209)
6. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: A case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007; 115: 2344-2351. (Pubitemid 46685903)
7. Edelman ER, Rogers C,. Pathobiological responses to stenting. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 4E-6E.
8. Lally C, Dolan F, Prendergast PJ,. Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: A finite element analysis. J Biomech 2005; 38: 1574-1581. (Pubitemid 40813479)
9. Mortier P, Holzapfel GA, Beule MD, et al. A novel simulation strategy for stent insertion and deployment in curved coronary bifurcations: Comparison of three drug-eluting stents. Anna Biomed Eng 2010; 38: 88-99.
10. Gyongyosi M, Yang P, Khorsand A, Glogar D,. Longitudinal straightening effect of stents is an additional predictor for major adverse cardiac events. Australian Wiktor stent study group and European paragon stent investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1580-1589. (Pubitemid 30307504)