A review of integrated geophysical investigations from archaeological and cultural sites under encroaching urbanisation in İzmir, Turkey

Physics and Chemistry of the Earth

Volumn 36, Issue 16, 2011, Pages 1294-1309

  Drahor, Mahmut Göktuĝ ^a  

^a DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Archaeology; Geophysics; Turkey; Urbanisation

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE; ARCHAEOLOGY; CULTURAL HERITAGE STUDIES; CULTURAL HERITAGES; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; GEOPHYSICAL TECHNIQUES; GLOBALISATION; HAZARD MITIGATIONS; NEW APPLICATIONS; NON DESTRUCTIVE; NON-INVASIVE; SOCIAL PROBLEMS; TURKEY; URBAN AREAS; URBANISATION;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EARTH SCIENCES; REMOTE SENSING; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

GEOPHYSICS;

ACOUSTICS; ARCHAEOLOGY; CULTURAL HERITAGE; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; GRAVITY; RADIOACTIVITY; URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION;

IZMIR [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 81455142223     PISSN: 14747065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2011.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Akurgal E. Ancient Civilizations and Ruins of Turkey 1983, Haşet Publishing, 398 p. fifth ed.
2. Basile V., Carrazzo M.T., Negri S., Nuzzo L., Quarta T., Villani A.V. A ground-penetrating radar survey for archaeological investigations in an urban area (Lecce, Italy). Journal of Applied Geophysics 2000, 44:15-32.
3. Benson A.K., Payne K.L., Stubben M.A. Mapping groundwater contamination using dc resistivity and VLF geophysical method-a case study. Geophysics 1997, 62(1):80-86.
4. Berge M.A., Drahor M.G. Electrical resistivity tomography investigations on höyük (tell, tepe) type archaeological settlements: Part I - synthetic modelling. Archaeological Prospection 2011, (in review).
5. Berge M.A., Drahor M.G. Electrical resistivity tomography investigations on höyük type (tell, tepe) archaeological settlements: Part-II A case from Old Smyrna Höyük, Turkey. Archaeological Prospection 2011, (in review).
6. Binley A., Shaw B., Henry-Poulter S. Flow pathways in porous media: electrical resistance tomography and dye staining image verification. Measurement Science Technology 1996, 7:384-390.
7. Booth A.D., Linford N.T., Clark R.A., Murray T. Three-dimensional, multi-offset ground-penetrating radar imaging of archaeological targets. Archaeological Prospection 2008, 15:93-112.
8. Booth A.D., Endres A.L., Murray T. Spectral bandwidth enhancement of GPR profiling data using multiple-frequency compositing. Journal of Applied Geophysics 2009, 67:88-97.
9. Cardarelli E., Bernabini M. Two case studies of the determination of parameters of urban waste dumps. Journal of Applied Geophysics 1997, 36:167-174.
10. Cardarelli E., Di Filippo G. Integrated geophysical surveys on waste dumps: evaluation of physical parameters to characterize an urban waste dump (four case studies in Italy). Waste Management and Research 2004, 22:390-402.
11. Christensen N.B., Sørensen K.I. Surface and borehole electric and electromagnetic methods for hydrogeophysical investigations. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 1998, 3:75-90.
12. Çilingiroĝlu, A., Derin, Z., Abay, E., Saĝlamtimur, H., Kayan, İ., 2004. Ulucak Höyük: Excavations Conducted between 1995-2002, Ancient Near Eastern Supplement, vol. 15, Louvain, 2004, Peeters.
13. Ciminale M., Gallo D. High-resolution magnetic survey in a quasi-urban environment. Near Surface Geophysics 2008, 6:97-103.
14. Clark A. Seeing Beneath the Soil 1990, Batsford, London.
15. Dabas M., Hesse A., Tabbagh J. Experimental resistivity survey at Wroxeter archaeological site with a fast and light recording device. Archaeological Prospection 2000, 7:107-118.
16. Davis J.L., Annan A.P. Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophysical Prospecting 1989, 37:531-551.
17. Drahor, M.G., 2001. 1998-1999 Ulucak Höyük arkeojeofizik araştirmalari raporu. Dokuz Eylül üniversitesi (in Turkish).
18. Drahor M.G. Application of the self-potential method to archaeological prospection: some case histories. Archaeological Prospection 2004, 11:77-105.
19. Drahor M.G. Integrated geophysical studies in the upper part of Sardis archaeological site, Turkey. Journal of Applied Geophysics 2006, 59:205-223.
20. Drahor M.G., Göktürkler G., Berge M.A., Kurtulmuş T.Ö., Tuna N. 3D resistivity imaging from an archaeological site in south-western Anatolia, Turkey: a case study. Near Surface Geophysics 2007, 5:195-201.
21. Drahor M.G., Kurtulmuş T.Ö., Berge M.A., Hartmann M., Speidel M.A. Magnetic imaging and electrical resistivity tomography studies in a Roman Military installation found in Satala archaeological site from northeastern of Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of Archaeological Science 2008, 35:259-271.
22. Drahor M.G., Berge M.A., Kurtulmuş T.Ö., Hartmann M., Speidel M.A. Magnetic and electrical resistivity tomography Investigationsin a Roman legionary camp site (Legio IV Scythica) in Zeugma, Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Archaeological Prospection 2008, 15:159-186.
23. Drahor M.G., Berge M.A., Öztürk C., Alpaslan N., Ergene G. Integrated usage of geophysical prospection techniques in Höyük (tepe, tell)-type archaeological settlements. Archeosciences, Revue d'archéométrie 2009, 33:291-293.
24. Drahor, M.G., Berge, M.A., Öztürk, C., 2011. Integrated geophysical surveys in the Agios Voukolos church, İzmir, Turkey. Journal of Archaeological Science, in press, doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.025.
25. Efimova, N.N., 1999. Evaluation of concrete of a road tunnel construction before and after cement mixture injections using complex electromagnetic methods. In: Proceedings for the EAGE 61st Conference and Technical Exhibition, Helsinki, Finland.
26. Eyles N. Environmental geology of Urban Areas. Geoscience Canada 1994, 21(4):158-162.
27. Gaffney C.F., Gater J.A., Linford P., Gaffney V.L., White R. Large-scale systematic fluxgate gradiometry at the Roman city of Wroxeter. Archaeological Prospection 2000, 7:81-99.
28. Gaffney V., Patterson H., Piro S., Goodman D., Nishimura Y. Multimethodological approach to study and characterize Forum Novum (Vescovio, Central Italy). Archaeological Prospection 2004, 11:201-212.
29. Goodman, D., 2008. Gpr-Slice v6 - Manual http://www.gpr-survey.com/.
30. Grasmueck M., Weger R., Horstmeyer H. Full-resolution 3D GPR imaging. Geophysics 2006, 70(1):K12-K19.
31. Henderson R.J. Urban Geophysics - a review. Exploration Geophysics 1992, 23(4):531-542.
32. Hesse A., Jolivet A., Tabbagh A. New prospects in shallow depth electrical surveying for archaeological and pedological applications. Geophysics 1986, 51:585-594.
33. Hodges, G., Rudd, J., Boitier, D., 2000. Mapping conductivity with helicopter electromagnetic surveys as an aid to planning and monitoring pipeline construction. In: Proceedings for SAGEEP 2000, Washington D.C., pp. 47-56.
34. Kaikkonen P. Numerical VLF modeling. Geophysical Prospecting 1979, 27:815-834.
35. Kaikkonen P., Sharma S.P. 2-D nonlinear joint inversion of VLF and VLF-R data using simulated annealing. Journal of Applied Geophysics 1998, 39:155-176.
36. Le Borgne E. Susceptibilité magnétique anormale du sol superficiel. Annales de Géophysique 1955, 11:399-419.
37. Le Borgne E. Influence du feu sur les propriétés magnétiques du sol et du granite. Annales de Géophysique 1960, 16:159-195.
38. Leckebusch J. Two-and three-dimensional Ground-penetrating radar surveys across a medieval choir: a case study in archaeology. Archaeological Prospection 2000, 7:189-200.
39. Leucci G., Negri S. Use of ground penetrating radar to map subsurface archaeological features in an urban area. Journal of Archaeological Science 2006, 33:502-512.
40. Leucci G., Greco F., Giorgi L.D., Mauceri R. Three-dimensional of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography survey in the castle of Occhiola (Sicily, Italy). Journal of Archaeological Science 2007, 34:233-242.
41. Liu L., Chan L.S. Sustainable urban development and geophysics. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 2007, 4:243-244.
42. Lohva, J., Jokinen, T., Vanhalla, H., Lahti, M., 1999. Landfill monitoring by airborne EM and ground resistivity measurements. In: Proceedings for the EEGS-ES 1999 Annual Meeting, Budapest, Hungary.
43. Loke M.H., Barker R.D. Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting 1996, 44:131-152.
44. Lück E., Eisenreich M., Spangenberg U., Christl G. A note on geophysical prospection of archaeological structures in Urban Contexts in Potsdam (Germany). Archaeological Prospection 1997, 4:231-238.
45. Marache, A., Obellianne, T., Denis, A., Breysse, D., 2000. Application of resistivity measurements to a tunneling site. In: Proceedings for the EEGS-ES 2000 Annual Meeting, Bochum, Germany.
46. Marsiglio, L., Pipan, M., Forte, E., Dal Moro, G., Finetti, I., 2003. Multi-frequency and multi-azimuth polarimetric GPR for buried utilities detection. In: EAGE 65th Conference & Exhibition-Stavanger, Norway, 2-5 June 2003.
47. Miltner, F., Kantar, S., 1934. İzmirde Roma Devrine Ait Forumda Yapilan Hafriyat Hakkinda İhzari Rapor, Türk Tarih, Arkeologya ve Etnografya Dergisi. No. 2, pp. 219-240.
48. Monteiro Santos F.A., Mateus A., Figueiras J., Gonçalves M.A. Mapping groundwater contamination around a landfill facility using the VLF-EM method-a case study. Journal of Applied Geophysics 2006, 60:115-125.
49. Mullins C.E. Magnetic susceptibility of the soil and its significance in soil science - a review. Journal of Soil Science 1977, 28:223-246.
50. Naudet V., Lazzari M., Perrone A., Loperte A., Piscitelli S., Lapenna V. Integrated geophysical and geomorphological approach to investigate the snowmelt-triggered landslide of Bosco Piccolo village (Basilicata, southern Italy). Engineering Geology 2008, 98:156-167.
51. Naumann R., Kantar S. Die Agora von Smyrna. Istanbuler Forschungen 1950, XVII:69-114.
52. Neubauer W., Eder-Hinterleitner A. Resistivity and magnetics of the Roman town Carnuntum, Austria: an example of combined interpretation of prospection data. Archaeological Prospection 1997, 4:179-189.
53. Pacione M. Urban Problems: An Applied Urban Analysis 1990, Routledge Publishing, UK.
54. Panissod C., Dabas M., Jolivet A., Tabbagh A. A novel mobile multipole system (MUCEP) for shallow (0-3m) geoelectrical investigation: the 'Vol-de-Canards' array. Geophysical Prospecting 1997, 45:983-1002.
55. Papadopoulos N.G., Tsourlos P., Tsokas G.N., Sarris A. Efficient ERT measuring and inversion strategies for 3D imaging of buried antiquities. Near Surface Geophysics 2007, 5:349-362.
56. Papadopoulos N., Sarris A., Yil M.J., Kim J.H. Urban archaeological investigations using surface 3D ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography methods. Exploration Geophysics 2009, 40:56-68.
57. Pellerin L. Application of electrical and electromagnetic methods for environmental and geotechnical investigations. Surveys in Geophysics 2002, 23:101-132.
58. Peters L.P., Daniels J.J., Young J.D. Ground penetrating radar as a subsurface environmental sensing tool. Proceedings of the IEEE 1994, 82:1802-1822.
59. Pozdnvakova L., Pozdvakov A., Zhang R. Application of geophysical methods to evaluate hydrology and soil properties in urban areas. Urban Water 2001, 3:205-216.
60. Samouelian A., Cousin I., Tabbagh A., Bruand A., Richard G. Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review. Soil & Tillage Research 2005, 83:173-193.
61. Seren S., Eder-Hinterleitner A., Neubauer W., Groh S. Combined high-resolution magnetics and GPR surveys of the roman town of Flavia Solva. Near Surface Geophysics 2004, 2:63-68.
62. Tabbagh A., Benderitter Y., Andrieux P., Decriaud J.P., Guerin R. VLF resistivity mapping and verticalization of the electric field. Geophysical Prospecting 1991, 39:1083-1097.
63. Tell I., Jönsson G., Bensryd I., Attewell R., Skerfving S., Strömberg U. Indoor radon-daughter concentration and gamma radiation in urban and rural homes on geologically varying ground. The Science of the Total Environment 1993, 128:191-203.
64. Tite M.S. The influence of geology of the magnetic susceptibility of soils on archaeological sites. Archaeometry 1972, 14:229-236.
65. Tite M.S., Mullins C. Enhancement of the magnetic susceptibility of soils on archaeological sites. Archaeometry 1971, 13:209-219.
66. Tsokas G.N., Giannopoulos A., Tsourlos P., Vargemezis G., Tealby J.M., Sarris A., Papazachos C.B., Savopoulou T. A large scale geophysical survey in the archaeological site of Europos (N. Greece). Journal of Applied Geophysics 1994, 32:85-98.
67. Tsokas G.N., Tsourlos P.I., Vargemezis G., Novack M. Nondestructive electrical resistivity tomography for indoor investigation: the case of Kapnikarea church in Athens. Archaeological Prospection 2008, 15:47-61.
68. Valle S., Zanzi L., Sgheiz M., Lenzi G., Friborg J. Ground penetrating radar antennas: theoretical and experimental directivity functions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2001, 39(4):749-758.
69. Wang T., Oristaglio M. 3D simulation of GPR survey over pipes in dispersive soils. Geophysics 2000, 65:1560-1568.
70. Wessel P., Smith W.H.F. New version of the generic mapping tools released. Eos 1995, 76:329.
71. Wisén, R., Bjelm, L., Dahlin, T., 2000. Resistivity imaging as a preinvestigation method in urban environments. In: Proceedings for the EEGS-ES 2000 Annual Meeting, Bochum, Germany.