Strategies for Reducing Radiation Exposure in Multi-Detector Row CT

Radiologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-14

  Sodickson, Aaron ^a,b  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; CTDIvol; DLP; Protocols; Radiation exposure; Strategies

Indexed keywords

AORTA DISSECTION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION MEASUREMENT; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIATION SAFETY; RADIATION SHIELD; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

COMPUTERS; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; HUMANS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOMETRY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 81455139639     PISSN: 00338389     EISSN: 15578275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2011.08.006     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Benchmark report CT 2007 2007, IMV Medical Information Division, IMV Medical Information Division, Des Plaines (IL).
2. Brenner D.J., Hall E.J. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007, 357(22):2277-2284.
3. Sodickson A., Baeyens P.F., Andriole K.P., et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 2009, 251(1):175-184.
4. Berrington de Gonzalez A., Mahesh M., Kim K.P., et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009, 169(22):2071-2077.
5. Mettler F.A., Bhargavan M., Faulkner K., et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources-1950-2007. Radiology 2009, 253(2):520-531.
6. Fazel R., Krumholz H.M., Wang Y., et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009, 361(9):849-857.
7. Amis E.S., Butler P.F., Applegate K.E., et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2007, 4(5):272-284.
8. Wells P.S., Anderson D.R., Rodger M., et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med 2001, 135(2):98-107.
9. Stiell I.G., Wells G.A., Vandemheen K., et al. The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001, 357(9266):1391-1396.
10. Stiell I.G., Wells G.A., Vandemheen K.L., et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001, 286(15):1841.
11. Khorasani R. Can radiology professional society guidelines be converted to effective decision support?. J Am Coll Radiol 2010, 7(8):561-562.
12. American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria. Available at: Accessed June 8, 2011. http://www.acr.org/secondarymainmenucategories/quality_safety/app_criteria.aspx.
13. Griffey R.T., Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 192(4):887-892.
14. Birnbaum S. Radiation safety in the era of helical CT: a patient-based protection program currently in place in two community hospitals in New Hampshire. J Am Coll Radiol 2008, 5(6):714-718.e5.
15. Sodickson A., Opraseuth J., Ledbetter S. Outside imaging in emergency department transfer patients: CD import reduces rates of subsequent imaging utilization. Radiology 2011, 260(2):408-413.
16. Massachusetts Medical Society. Investigation of defensive medicine in Massachusetts Available at:, Accessed September 9, 2011. http://www.massmed.org/defensivemedicine.
17. Levin D.C., Rao V.M. The effect of self-referral on utilization of advanced diagnostic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011, 196(4):848-852.
18. McNitt-Gray M.F. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics 2002, 22(6):1541-1553.
19. American Association of Physicists in Medicine The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT. Report 96. AAPM task group 23 of the diagnostic imaging council CT Committee 2008, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park (MD).
20. McCollough C.H., Leng S., Yu L., et al. CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology 2011, 259(2):311-316.
21. Turner A.C., Zhang D., Khatonabadi M., et al. The feasibility of patient size-corrected, scanner-independent organ dose estimates for abdominal CT exams. Med Phys 2011, 38(2):820-829.
22. Huda W., Vance A. Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188(2):540.
23. AAPM task group 204 AAPM report 204: size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations 2011.
24. Shrimpton P. Assessment of patient dose in CT. Chilton, NRPB-PE/1/2004, 2004.
25. National Research Council (U.S.). Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Level of Ionizing Radiation. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII, Phase 2 2006, Palo Alto (CA).
26. McCollough C.H., Christner J.A., Kofler J.M. How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 194(4):890-896.
27. Padilla A., Alquist E.K. California senate bill 1237 Available at:, Accessed September 9, 2011. http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_1201-1250/sb_1237_bill_20100929_chaptered.html.
28. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Radiation dose reduction - white paper: initiative to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure from medical imaging. Available at: Accessed December 24, 2010. http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/RadiationDoseReduction/ucm199994.htm.
29. Bongartz G., Golding S.J., Jurik A.G., et al. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography Available at:, Accessed June 8, 2011. http://www.msct.eu/CT_Quality_Criteria.htm.
30. The American College Of Radiology ACR Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical X-Ray Imaging Available at:, Accessed September 9, 2011. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/med_phys/reference_levels.aspx.
31. Kalra M.K., Maher M.M., Toth T.L., et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004, 230(3):619.
32. McCollough C.H., Primak A.N., Braun N., et al. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am 2009, 47(1):27-40.
33. The alliance for radiation safety in pediatric imaging. Image gently. Available at: Accessed May 26, 2011. http://www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/index.cfm%3fpage%3d614.
34. Strauss K.J., Goske M.J., Kaste S.C., et al. Image gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 194(4):868.
35. Kalendar W.A. Computed tomography 2011, Publicis Publishing, Erlangen (Germany). 3rd edition.
36. McCollough C.H., Bruesewitz M.R., Kofler J.M., et al. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 2006, 26(2):503-512.
37. Sodickson A, Turner AC, McGlamery K, et al. Variation in organ dose from abdomen-pelvis CT exams performed with tube current modulation (TCM): evaluation of patient size effects. Radiographic Society of North America 2010 annual meeting. Chicago (IL).
38. Israel G.M., Cicchiello L., Brink J., et al. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010, 195(6):1342.
39. FDA Safety investigation of CT brain perfusion scans: update 11/9/2010 Available at:, Accessed June 6, 2011. http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/ucm185898.htm.
40. Chow L.C., Kwan S.W., Olcott E.W., et al. Split-bolus MDCT urography with synchronous nephrographic and excretory phase enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 189(2):314.
41. Deak P.D., Langner O., Lell M., et al. Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT. Radiology 2009, 252(1):140.
42. Ptak T., Rhea J.T., Novelline R.A. Radiation dose is reduced with a single-pass whole-body multi-detector row CT trauma protocol compared with a conventional segmented method: initial experience. Radiology 2003, 229(3):902.
43. Nguyen D., Platon A., Shanmuganathan K., et al. Evaluation of a single-pass continuous whole-body 16-MDCT protocol for patients with polytrauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 192(1):3.
44. Poletti P.A., Platon A., Rutschmann O.T., et al. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188(4):927.
45. Bae K.T. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 2010, 256(1):32.
46. Menke J. Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology 2005, 236(2):565.
47. Luaces M., Akers S., Litt H. Low kVp imaging for dose reduction in dual-source cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 25(S2):165-175.
48. Grant K., Schmidt B. CARE kV - Automated Dose-Optimized Selection of X-ray Tube Voltage 2011, White Paper. Siemens, Available at:, Accessed September 9, 2011. http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_US/gg_ct_FBAs/files/Case_Studies/CarekV_White_Paper.pdf.
49. Yu L., Li H., Fletcher J.G., et al. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. Med Phys 2010, 37(1):234-243.
50. RSNA News Research fuels debate over bismuth breast shields Available at:, Accessed June 9, 2011. http://www.rsna.org/Publications/rsnanews/May-2011/breast_shields_feature.cfm.
51. Modica M.J., Kanal K.M., Gunn M.L. The obese emergency patient: imaging challenges and solutions. Radiographics 2011, 31(3):811-823.
52. Grant K., Flohr T. Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) 2010, White Paper, Available at:, Accessed September 9, 2011. http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_US/gg_ct_FBAs/files/brochures/IRIS_WhitePaper_v3.pdf.
53. Hara A.K., Paden R.G., Silva A.C., et al. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193(3):764.
54. Sodickson A., Khorasani R. Patient-centric radiation dose monitoring in the electronic health record: what are some of the barriers and key next steps?. J Am Coll Radiol 2010, 7(10):752-753.
55. Digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) supplement 127: CT radiation dose reporting (Dose SR) Available at:, Accessed September 9, 2011. ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup127_ft.pdf.
56. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise IHE Radiology, Technical Framework Supplement: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Available at:, Accessed September 9, 2011. http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_RAD_Suppl_REM_Rev2-1_TI_2010-11-16.pdf.
57. Cook T.S., Zimmerman S., Maidment A.D., et al. Automated extraction of radiation dose information for CT examinations. J Am Coll Radiol 2010, 7(11):871-877.