|
|
|
Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1099-1113
|
|
Causative vs. beneficial complicity in the embryonic stem cell debate.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
AUSTRALIA;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
COMPLICITY;
CYTOLOGY;
ECONOMICS;
EMBRYO;
EMBRYO PROTECTION ACT 1990 (GERMANY);
EMBRYO RESEARCH;
ETHICS;
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GERMANY;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
LEGAL ASPECT;
POLICY;
POLITICS;
STEM CELL;
UNITED STATES;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
EMBRYO PROTECTION ACT 1990 (GERMANY);
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
AUSTRALIA;
COMPLICITY;
EMBRYO;
EMBRYO RESEARCH;
FINANCING, GOVERNMENT;
GERMANY;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
INTERNATIONALITY;
POLITICS;
PUBLIC POLICY;
STEM CELLS;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 8144230426
PISSN: 00106151
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (12)
|
|
References (0)
|
