A comparison of the inductive-limit footprints of airborne electromagnetic configurations

Geophysics

Volumn 69, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1229-1239

  Reid, James E ^a   Vrbancich, Julian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b DEFENCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SIGNAL RECEIVERS; TRANSMITTERS; AIRCRAFT; ELECTROMAGNETIC PROSPECTING; FIXED WINGS; GEOMETRY; MAGNETIC FIELD MEASUREMENT; MAGNETOMETERS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ELECTROMAGNETIC COUPLINGS; INDUCTIVE-LIMIT MODELS; TOWED-BIRD RECEIVERS; AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC; COPLANAR GEOMETRY; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENTS; GEOPHYSICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; MAGNETIC DIPOLE; VERTICAL COMPONENT; VERTICAL MAGNETIC DIPOLES;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; TRANSMITTERS;

AIRBORNE SURVEY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY; GEOMETRY; INSTRUMENTATION;

AVES;

EID: 8144228081     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1801939     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Annetts, D. W., F. Sugeng, J. Macnae, and A. Raiche, 2000, Modeling the airborne electromagnetic response of a vertical contact: Exploration Geophysics, [b 31 b], 115-125.
2. Balch, S. J., W. P, Boyko, and N. R. Paterson, 2003, The AeroTEM airborne electromagnetic system: The Leading Edge, [b 22 b], 562-566.
3. Beamish, D., 2003, Airborne EM footprints: Geophysical Prospecting, [b 51 b], 49-60.
4. Boyd, G., 2001, Normandy heli borne time-domain EM system: 15th Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Extended Abstracts.
5. Eaton, R, B. Anderson, B. Nilsson, E. Lauritsen, S. Queen, and C. Barnett, 2002, NEWTEM-A novel time-domain helicopter electromagnetic system for resistivity mapping: 72nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts.
6. Edwards, R. N., and M. N. Nabighian, 1991, The magnetometric resistivity method; [i in i] M. N. Nabighian, editor, Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: SEG, [b 2 b], 47-104.
7. Fountain, D., 1998, Airborne electromagnetic systems-50 years of development: Exploration Geophysics, [b 29 b], 1-11.
8. Grant, F. S., and G. f. West, 1965, Interpretation theory in applied geophysics: McGraw-Hill.
9. Haas, C., H. Edeler, M. Schurmann, J. Lobach, and K.-P. Sengpiel, 2002, First operation of AWI HEM-bird for sea ice thickness sounding: Proc. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Geophysikalischen Gesellschaft, [b 62 b], 36-38.
10. Kovacs, A., J. S. Holladay, and C. J. J. Bergeron, 1995, The footprint/altitude ratio for helicopter electromagnetic sounding of sea ice thickness: comparison of theoretical and field estimates: Geophysics, [b 60 b], 374-380.
11. Lane, R., A. Green, C. Golding, M. Owers, P. Pik, C. Plunkett, D. Sattel, and B.Iborn, 2000, An example of 3-D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST AEM system: Exploration Geophysics, [b 31 b], 162-172.
12. Liu, G., and A. Becker, 1990, Two-dimensional mapping of sea ice keels with airborne electromagnetics: Geophysics, [b 55 b], 239-248.
13. Poikonen, A., K. Sulkanen, M. Oksama, and I. Suppala, 1998, Novel dual frequency fixed-wing airborne EM system of Geological Survey of Finland (GTK): Exploration Geophysics, [b 29 b], 46-51.
14. Raiche, A., F. Sugeng, and Z. Xiong, 1996, Modeling complex structures using the thin sheet approximation: 13th Workshop on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth, Proceedings, 107-108.
15. Reid, J. E., and J. C. Macnae, 1999, Doubling the effective skin depth with a local source: Geophysics, [b 64 b], 732-738.
16. Reid, J. E., J. Vrbancich, and A. P. Worby, 2003, A comparison of shipborne and airborne electromagnetic methods for Antarctic sea ice thickness measurements: Exploration Geophysics, [b 34 b], 46-50.
17. Sattel, D., 2003, The resolution of shallow horizontal structure with AEM: 16th Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Extended Abstracts.
18. Smith, R. S., and P. B. Keating, 1996, The usefulness of multicomponent, time-domain airborne electromagnetic measurements: Geophysics, [b 61 b], 74-81.
19. Sorensen, K. I., and E. Auken, 2003, New developments in high-resolution airborne TEM instrumentation: 16th Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Extended Abstracts.
20. Vrbancich, J., D. W. Annetts, J. C. Macnae, D. Sattel, and R. Lane, 2001, Time domain airborne electromagnetic reconnaissance for seadepth measurement and shipwreck localisation: 15th Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Extended Abstracts.
21. Vrbancich, J., P. Wolfgram, and D. Sattel, 2003, AEM bathymetry near Busselton, Western Australia-Comparison of 25 Hz and 12.5 Hz GEOTEM in areas of high conductance: 16th Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Extended Abstracts.
22. Weaver, J. T., 1994, Mathematical methods for geo-electromagnetic induction: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.