The operating characteristics of the major HRNES-R measures

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1043-1061

  Russell, Elbert W ^a  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

HRB tests; HRNES R; Operating characteristics

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 8144226036     PISSN: 08876177     EISSN: 18735843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2003.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ardila A. A neuropsychological approach to intelligence. Neuropsychological Review. 9(3):1999;117-136
2. Daubert v. Merrell. (1993). Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 113 Supreme Court Reporter (S.CT.) 2786 (1993).
3. Duncan D., Snow W.G. Base rates in neuropsychology. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice. 18:1987;368-370
4. Franzen, M. D. (2000). Reliability and validity in neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
5. Golden, C. J., Purisch, A. D., & Hammeke, T. A. (1991). Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: Forms I and II [Manual]. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
6. Goldstein G., Shelly C.H. Statistical and normative studies of the Halstead Neuropsychological Test Battery relevant to a neuropsychiatric setting. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 34:1972;603-620
7. Goldstein G., Shelly C.H. A further attempt to cross-validate the Russell, Neuringer, and Goldstein Neuropsychological Keys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 50:1982;721-726
8. Gouvier, W. D. (1999). Base rates and clinical decision-making in neuropsychology. In J. Sweet (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Fundamentals and practice. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
9. Gouvier W.D. Are you sure you're telling the truth? NeuroRehabilitation. 16:2001;215-219
10. Gouvier, W. D., Hayes, J. S., & Smiroldo, B. B. (1998). The significance of base rates, test sensitivity, test specificity, and subjects knowledge of symptoms and asserting TBI sequelae and malingering. In C. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation. New York: Plenum Press.
11. Guilford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Larrabee G.J. Association between IQ and neuropsychological test performance: Commentary on Tremont, Hoffman, Scott, and Adams (1998). The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 14(1):2000;139-145
13. Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1990). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (3rd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
14. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford.
15. McKinzey R.K., Podd M.H., Krehbiel M.A., Mensch A.L., Trombka C.C. Detection of malingering on the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: An initial and cross-validation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 12:1997;505-512
16. Meehl P.E., Rosen A. Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin. 52:1955;194-216
17. Reed J.E. Fixed vs. flexible neuropsychological test batteries under the Daubert standard for admissibility of scientific evidence. Behavioral Science and the Law. 14:1996;315-322
18. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1993). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation (2nd ed.). Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
19. Retzlaff, P. D., & Gibertini, M. (2000). Neuropsychometric issues and problems. In R. D. Vanderploeg (Ed.), Clinician's guide to neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed., pp. 277-299). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Russell E.W. The effect of acute lateralized brain damage on Halstead's Biological Intelligence Factors. Journal of General Psychology. 90:1974;101-107
21. Russell, E. W. (1991). A reference scale method for constructing neuropsychological test batteries. In B. P. Rourke, L. Costa, D. V. Cicchetti, K. M. Adams, & K. J. Plasterk (Eds.), Methodological and biostatistical foundations of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 399-415). Berwyn, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.
22. Russell E.W. The accuracy of automated and clinical detection of brain damage and lateralization in neuropsychology. Neuropsychology Review. 5(1):1995;1-68
23. Russell E.W. Toward an explanation of Dodrill's observation: High neuropsychological test performance does not accompany high IQs. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 15:2001;423-428
24. Russell, E. W., Neuringer, C., & Goldstein, G. (1970). Assessment of brain damage: A neuropsychological key approach. New York: Wiley Company.
25. Russell, E. W., & Starkey, R. I. (1993). Halstead, Russell Neuropsychological Evaluation System [Manual and computer program]. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
26. Russell, E. W., & Starkey, R.I. (2001a). Halstead, Russell Neuropsychological Evaluation System - Revised [Appendix F]. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
27. Russell, E. W., & Starkey, R. I. (2001b). Halstead, Russell Neuropsychological Evaluation System - Revised [Manual and computer program]. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
28. Wechsler, D. (1981). WAIS-R, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised [Manual]. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
29. Willis W.G. Reanalysis of an actuarial approach to neuropsychological diagnosis in consideration of base rates. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 52:1984;567-569