Femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty in failed penetrating keratoplasty and globe trauma

Cornea

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1358-1362

  Rush, Sloan W ^a   Fraunfelder, Frederick W ^a   Mathers, William D ^a   Chamberlain, Winston D ^a,b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b or 97239 4197   (United States)

Author keywords

corneal scar; failed graft; femtosecond laser assisted keratoplasty; open globe injury; zigzag

Indexed keywords

ANTIGLAUCOMA AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; BEST SPECTACLE CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORNEA INJURY; CORNEAL LACERATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FEMTOSECOND LASER; FEMTOSECOND LASER ASSISTED KERATOPLASTY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISION; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMETRY; KERATOPLASTY; MALE; OPEN GLOBE TRAUMA; OPERATING ROOM; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; PINHOLE VISUAL ACUITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPECTACLES; SUTURE REMOVAL; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNCORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; CORNEAL SURGERY, LASER; EYE INJURIES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT FAILURE; VISUAL ACUITY; WOUNDS, NONPENETRATING;

EID: 81355148611     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318211410e     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ignacio TS, Nguyen TB, Chuck RS, et al. Top hat wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty using the femtosecond laser: a laboratory model. Cornea. 2006;25:336-340.
2. Kook D, Derhartunian V, Bug R, et al. Top-hat shaped corneal trephination for penetrating keratoplasty using the femtosecond laser: a histomorphological study. Cornea. 2009;28:795-800.
3. Kim JH, Choi SK, Lee D. The comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty with conventional surgery in terms of endothelial safety: ex vivo study using porcine eyes. Cornea. 2009;28:812-816.
4. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, McAllum P, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty: stability evaluation of different wound configurations. Cornea. 2008;27:209-211.
5. Steinert RF, Ignacio TS, Sarayba MA. "Top hat"-shaped penetrating keratoplasty using the femtosecond laser. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143: 689-691.
6. Chamberlain WD, Rush SW, Mathers WD, et al. Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:486-491.
7. Farid M, Steinert RF, Gaster RN, et al. Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zig-zag incision versus conventional blade trephination. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1638-1643.
8. Hernández-Verdejo JL, Teus MA, Román JM, et al. Porcine model to compare real-time intraocular pressure during LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48:68-72.
9. Farid M, Kim M, Steinert RF. Results of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zigzag incision: initial report. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2208-2212.
10. Kim SJ,Wee WR, Lee JH, et al. The effect of different suturing techniques on astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. J Korean Med Sci. 2008;23: 1015-1019.
11. Javadi MA, Naderi M, Zare M, et al. Comparison of the effect of three suturing techniques on postkeratoplasty astigmatism in keratoconus. Cornea. 2006;25:1029-1033.
12. Solano JM, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Keratometric astigmatism after suture removal in penetrating keratoplasty: double running versus single running suture techniques. Cornea. 2003;22:716-720.
13. Malta JB, Soong HK, Shtein R, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty: laboratory studies in eye bank eyes. Curr Eye Res. 2009;34:18-25.
14. Wagoner MD, Ba-Abbad R, Al-Mohaimeed M, et al; King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital Corneal Transplant Study Group. Postoperative complications after primary adult optical penetrating keratoplasty: prevalence and impact on graft survival. Cornea. 2009;28: 385-394.
15. Banitt M, Lee RK. Management of patients with combined glaucoma and corneal transplant surgery. Eye (Lond). 2009;23: 1972-1979.
16. Foulks GN. Glaucoma associated with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:871-874.
17. Kirkness CM, Ficker LA. Risk factors for the development of postkeratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea. 1992;11:427-432.
18. Karadag O, Kugu S, Erdogan G, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for increased intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2010;29:278-282.