E-learning interactions, information technology self efficacy and student achievement at the University of Sharjah, UAE

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1014-1025

  Abulibdeh, Enas Said ^a   Hassan, Sharifah Sariah Syed ^b  

^a AL AIN UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

^b INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81355139380     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.926     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alsharif, N. Z. (2006). Optimizing the four important interactions in distance education: An example medicinal chemistry course. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, Sheraton San Diego Hotel & Marina, San Diego, California, USA, 5 July [viewed 11 Oct 2006, verified 6 Sep 2011]. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p115685_index.html
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. http://doi.apa.org/journals/rev/84/2/191.pdf
3. Bates, C. H. (2006). The effects of self-regulated learning strategies on achievement, control beliefs about learning, and intrinsic goal orientation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(5). (UMI No. 3218874). http://gradworks.umi.com/32/18/3218874.html
4. Benbunan-Fich, R. (2002). Improving education and training with information technology. Communications of the ACM, 45(6), 94-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/508448.508454
5. Blackboard System Manual (2007). Blackboard Inc. [viewed 2 Feb 2007]. http://www.blackboard.com/
6. Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X. & Lee, S.-H. (2005). The importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1). [viewed 20 Mar 2007]. http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/4.1.1.pdf
7. Burkhardt, M. & Brass, D. (1990). Changing patterns of patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 104-127.
8. DeTure, M. (2004). Cognitive style and self-efficacy: Predicting student success in online distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 21-38. [abstract only] http://www.ajde.com/Abstracts/abs18_1b.htm
9. Devries, Y. E. (1996). The interactivity component of distance learning implemented in an art studio class. Education, 117(2), 180-184.
10. Devries, P. (2005). An analysis framework approach for managing corporate e-learning. eJOV, 7, 112-118. [viewed 6 Jan2007; abstract only]. http://www.ejov.org/apps/pub.asp?Q=1643&T=eJOV%20Issues
11. Garrison, D. R. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York: Falmer Press.
12. Gaythwaite, E. S. (2006). Metacognitive self-regulation, self-efficacy for learning and performance, and critical thinking as predictors of academic success and course retention among community college students enrolled in online, telecourse, and traditional public speaking courses. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(3). (UMI No.3210356). [abstract only] http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/ER/detail/hkul/3840132
13. Gibson, C.A. (2002). Being real: The student-teacher relationship and African-American male delinquency. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
14. Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C. A. & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conference. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431. [viewed 22 Jan 2008]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
15. Harmon, S. W. & Jones, M. G. (1999). The five levels of web use in education: Factors to consider in planning online courses. Educational Technology, 39(6), 28-32.
16. Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawerdena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526853
17. Johnson, R. D. & Marakas, G. M. (2000). The role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition: Toward refinement of the model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 402-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.402.11869
18. Lee, C.-Y. C.(undated). Self-efficacy instrument. http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~coreylee/projects/self_efficacy_instrument.htm
19. Marakas, G. M., Johnson, R. D. & Clay, P. F. (2007). The evolving nature of the computer selfefficacy construct: An empirical investigation of measurement construction, validity, reliability and stability over time. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(1), 16-46. http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol8/iss1/2/
20. Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153
21. Miller, I. (1994). KidVid: Math games by kids for kids. A SBIR proposal to the Department of Energy by The Lightspan Partnership, Inc., Carlsbad, CA.
22. Milman, N. & Heinecke, W. (1999). Technology and constructivist teaching in post-secondary instruction: Using the World Wide Web in an undergraduate history course. [viewed 6 May 2007, verified 7 Sep 2011]. http://www.vcdh.virginia.edu/milman_heinecke.html
23. Miltiadou, M. & Yu, C. H. (2000). Validation of the Online Technologies Self-efficacy Scale (OTSES). http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet? accno=ED445672
24. Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interactions. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. Retrieved February 5, 2006. http://www.ajde.com/Contents/vol3_2.htm
25. Muilenburg, L. Y. & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269
26. Ryan, S., Scott, B., Freeman, H. & Patel, D. (2000). The virtual university: The Internet and resourcebased learning. London: Kogan Page.
27. Shih, P., Martinez-Molina, A. & Muñoz, D. (2008). The navigation experience in an online activity: Related variables to user satisfaction. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 1484-1493. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved January 1, 2009. http://www.editlib.org/p/28577
28. Sutton, L. (2001). The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 223-242. http://www.editlib.org/p/9534
29. Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526852
30. Webster, J. & Martocchio, J. J. (1992). Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 201-226. http://www.jstor.org/stable/249576
31. Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C. & Tan, S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836-1884. http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=12098