Longitudinal dynamic analyses of cognition in the health and retirement study panel

AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis

Volumn 95, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 453-480

  McArdle, John J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81355138980     PISSN: 18638171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10182-011-0168-z     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Allison, P. D.: Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. In: Clogg, C. C. (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1990, pp. 93-114. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1990).
2. Baltagi, B.: Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley, New York (2005).
3. Bayley, N.: Learning in adulthood: the role of intelligence. In: Klausmeier, H. J., Harris, C. W. (eds.) Analyses of Concept Learning, pp. 117-138. Academic Press, New York (1966).
4. Boker, S. M.: Differential structural equation modeling of intra-individual variability. In: Collins, L., Sayer, A. (eds.) New Methods for the Analysis of Change, pp. 3-28. APA, Washington (2001).
5. Boker, S., McArdle, J. J.: Vector field plots. In: Armitage, P., Colton, P. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, vol. 8, pp. 5700-5704, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2005).
6. Bollen, K., Curran, P. J.: Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Perspective. Wiley, New York (2006).
7. Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W.: Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Sage, Newbury Park (1992).
8. Cagney, K. A., Lauderdale, D. S.: Education, wealth and cognitive function in later life. J. Geront., Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 57B, P163-P172 (2002).
9. Cattell, R. B.: The Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. Macmillan, New York (1966).
10. Chow, S.-M., Ferrer, E., Nesselroade, J. R.: An unscented Kalman filter approach for the estimation of nonlinear dynamic systems models. Multivar. Behav. Res. 42(2), 283-321 (2007).
11. Cnaan, A., Laird, N. M., Slasor, P.: Using the general linear mixed model to analyze unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Stat. Med. 16, 2349-2380 (1997).
12. Collins, L., Sayer, A. (eds.): New Methods for the Analysis of Change. APA, Washington (2001).
13. Cronbach, L. J., Furby, L.: How we should measure change-or should we? Psychol. Bull. 74, 68-80 (1970).
14. Cudeck, R., Klebe, K. J.: Multiphase mixed-effects models for repeated measures data. Psychol. Methods 7(1), 41-62 (2002).
15. Diggle, P. J., Liang, K.-Y., Zeger, S. L.: Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford Press, New York (1994).
16. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Strycker, L. A., Li, F.: An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006).
17. Ferrer, E., McArdle, J. J.: An experimental analysis of dynamic hypotheses about cognitive abilities and achievement from childhood to early adulthood. Dev. Psychol. 40, 935-952 (2004).
18. Ferrer, E., Hamagami, F., McArdle, J. J.: Modeling latent growth curves with incomplete data using different types of structural equation modeling and multilevel software. Struct. Equ. Model. 11(3), 452-483 (2004).
19. Freedman, V. A., Aykan, H., Martin, L. G.: Another look at aggregate changes in severe cognitive impairment: cumulative effects of three survey design issues. J. Geront., Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 57B, S126-S131 (2002).
20. Ghisletta, P., Lindenberger, U.: Exploring the structural dynamics of the link between sensory and cognitive functioning in old age: longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Intelligence 33, 555-587 (2005).
21. Grimm, K. J., Hamagami, F., McArdle, J. J.: Nonlinear growth models in research on cognitive aging. In: Montfort, K. v., Oud, H., Satorra, A. (eds.) Longitudinal Models in the Behavioural and Related Sciences, pp. 267-294. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2007).
22. Hamagami, F., McArdle, J. J.: Advanced studies of individual differences linear dynamic models for longitudinal data analysis. In: Marcoulides, G., Schumacker, R. (eds.) New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equations Modeling, pp. 203-246. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000).
23. Harris, C. W. (ed.): Problems in Measuring Change. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison (1963).
24. Hedecker, D., Gibbons, R.: Longitudinal Data Analysis. Wiley, New York (2006).
25. Herzog, A. R., Wallace, R. B.: Measures of cognitive functioning in the AHEAD study. J. Geront., Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 52B, 37-48 (1997) (Special Issue).
26. Horn, J. L.: State, trait, and change dimensions of intelligence. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 42(2), 159-185 (1972).
27. Horn, J. L., McArdle, J. J.: Understanding human intelligence since Spearman. In: Cudeck, R., MacCallum, R. (eds.) Factor Analysis at 100 Years, pp. 205-247. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2007).
28. Hsiao, C.: Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003).
29. Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D.: Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models. Abt Books, Cambridge (1979).
30. Juster, F. T., Suzman, R.: An overview of the health and retirement study. J. Hum. Resour. 30(Suppl), S7-S56 (1995).
31. Kenny, D. A., Zautra, A.: The trait-state model for longitudinal data. In: Collins, L., Sayer, A. (eds.) New Methods for the Analysis of Change, pp. 241-264. APA, Washington (2001).
32. Kline, R.: Principles and Practices in Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford, New York (2005).
33. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., Wolfinger, R. D., Schabenberger, O.: SAS System for Mixed Models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute, Cary (2006).
34. Little, R. J. A.: Modeling the dropout mechanism in repeated-measures studies. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 1112-1121 (1995).
35. Lord, F.: Further problems in the measurement of growth. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 18, 437-454 (1958).
36. McArdle, J. J.: Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models. Behav. Genet. 16(1), 163-200 (1986).
37. McArdle, J. J.: Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In: Nesselroade, J. R., Cattell, R. B. (eds.) The Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 561-614. Plenum, New York (1988).
38. McArdle, J. J.: Structural modeling experiments using multiple growth functions. In: Ackerman, P., Kanfer, R., Cudeck, R. (eds.) Learning and Individual Differences: Abilities, Motivation, and Methodology, pp. 71-117. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1989).
39. McArdle, J. J.: Structural factor analysis experiments with incomplete data. Multivar. Behav. Res. 29(4), 409-454 (1994).
40. McArdle, J. J.: A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analyses. In: Cudeck, R., du Toit, S., Sorbom, D. (eds.) Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future, pp. 342-380. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood (2001).
41. McArdle, J. J.: Five steps in the structural factor analysis of longitudinal data. In: Cudeck, R., MacCallum, R. (eds.) Factor Analysis at 100 Years, pp. 99-130. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2007).
42. McArdle, J. J.: Latent variable modeling of differences and changes. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 60 (2008).
43. McArdle, J. J., Anderson, E.: Latent variable growth models for research on aging. In: Birren, J. E., Schaie, K. W. (eds.) The Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, pp. 21-43. Plenum Press, New York (1990).
44. McArdle, J. J., Bell, R. Q.: An introduction to latent growth curve models for developmental data analysis. In: Little, T. D., Schnabel, K. U., Baumert, J. (eds.) Modeling Longitudinal and Multiple-Group Data: Practical Issues, Applied Approaches, and Scientific Examples, pp. 69-107. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000).
45. McArdle, J. J., Hamagami, F.: Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectional data using latent growth structural models. In: Collins, L., Horn, J. L. (eds.) Best Methods for the Analysis of Change, pp. 276-304. APA, Washington (1991).
46. McArdle, J. J., Hamagami, F.: Multilevel models from a multiple group structural equation perspective. In: Marcoulides, G., Schumacker, R. (eds.) Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques, pp. 89-124. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1996).
47. McArdle, J. J., Hamagami, F.: Linear dynamic analyses of incomplete longitudinal data. In: Collins, L., Sayer, A. (eds.) Methods for the Analysis of Change, pp. 137-176. APA, Washington (2001).
48. McArdle, J. J., Nesselroade, J. R.: Structuring data to study development and change. In: Cohen, S. H., Reese, H. W. (eds.) Life-Span Developmental Psychology: Methodological Innovations, pp. 223-267. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1994).
49. McArdle, J. J., Nesselroade, J. R.: Growth curve analyses in contemporary psychological research. In: Schinka, J., Velicer, W. (eds.) Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology, Volume Two: Research Methods in Psychology, pp. 447-480. Pergamon, New York (2003).
50. McArdle, J. J., Woodcock, J. R.: Expanding test-rest designs to include developmental time-lag components. Psychol. Methods 2(4), 403-435 (1997).
51. McArdle, J. J., Hamagami, F., Meredith, W., Bradway, K. P.: Modeling the dynamic hypotheses of Gf-Gc theory using longitudinal life-span data. Learn. Individ. Differ. 12(2000), 53-79 (2001).
52. McArdle, J. J., Ferrer-Caja, E., Hamagami, F., Woodcock, R. W.: Comparative longitudinal multilevel structural analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life-span. Dev. Psychol. 38(1), 115-142 (2002).
53. McArdle, J. J., Hamagami, F., Jones, K., Jolesz, F., Kikinis, R., Spiro, A., Albert, M. S.: Structural modeling of dynamic changes in memory and brain structure using longitudinal data from the normative aging study. J. Geront., Psychol. Sci. 59B(6), P294-P304 (2004).
54. McArdle, J. J., Small, B. J., Backman, L., Fratiglioni, L.: Longitudinal models of growth and survival applied to the early detection of Alzheimer's Disease. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 18(4), 234-241 (2005).
55. McArdle, J. J., Fisher, G. G., Kadlec, K. M.: Latent variable analysis of age trends in tests of cognitive ability in the health and retirement survey, 1992-2004. Psychol. Aging 22(3), 525-545 (2007).
56. McArdle, J. J., Hamagami, F., Kadlec, K., Fisher, G.: A dynamic structural analysis of dyadic cycles of depression in the Health and Retirement Study data. Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Southern California (2009).
57. McArdle, J. J., Grimm, K., Hamagami, F., Bowles, R., Meredith, W.: A dynamic structural equation analysis of vocabulary abilities over the life-span. Psychol. Methods (2009, in press).
58. McDonald, R. P.: Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Mahwah, Erlbaum (1999).
59. Meredith, W.: Notes on factorial invariance. Psychometrika 29, 177-185 (1964).
60. Meredith, W., Horn, J. L.: The role of factorial invariance in measuring growth and change. In: Collins, L., Sayer, A. (eds.) New Methods for the Analysis of Change, pp. 201-240. APA, Washington (2001).
61. Meredith, W., Tisak, J.: Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika 55, 107-122 (1990).
62. Miyazaki, Y., Raudenbush, S. W.: Tests for linkage of multiple cohorts in an accelerated longitudinal design. Psychol. Methods 5(1), 24-63 (2000).
63. Montfort, K., Oud, H., Satorra, A. (eds.): Longitudinal Models in the Behavioural and Related Sciences. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2007).
64. Muller, K. E., Stewart, P. W.: Linear Model Theory. Wiley, New York (2006).
65. Muthén, L. K., Muthén, B. O.: Mplus, the Comprehensive Modeling Program for Applied Researchers: 4th Edition User's Guide. Muthen & Muthen, Los Angeles (2006).
66. Nesselroade, J. R., Baltes, P. B. (eds.): Longitudinal Research in the Study of Behavior and Development. Academic Press, New York (1979).
67. Nesselroade, J. R., Cable, D. G.: Sometimes it's okay to factor difference scores-the separation of state and trait anxiety. Multivar. Behav. Res. 9, 273-282 (1974).
68. Orth, U., Berking, M., Walker, N., Meier, L. L., Znoj, H.: Forgiveness and psychological adjustment following interpersonal transgressions: a longitudinal analysis. J. Res. Pers. 42, 365-385 (2008).
69. Oud, J. H. L., Jansen, R. A. R. G.: Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of SEM. Psychometrika 65, 199-215 (2000).
70. Rodgers, W. L., Ofstedal, M. B., Herzog, A. R.: Trends in scores on tests of cognitive ability in the elderly US population, 1993-2000. J. Geront., Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 58B, S338-S346 (2003).
71. Rogosa, D.: Causal models in longitudinal research: rationale, formulation, and interpretation. In: Nesselroade, J. R., Baltes, P. B. (eds.) Longitudinal Research in the Study of Behavior and Development, pp. 263-302. Academic Press, New York (1979).
72. Rogosa, D., Willett, J.: Demonstrating the reliability of the difference score in the measurement of change. J. Educ. Meas. 20(4), 335-343 (1983).
73. Singer, J. D., Willett, J.: Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis. Oxford University Press, London (2003).
74. Steyer, R., Partchev, I., Shanahan, M. J.: Modeling true intraindividual change in structural equation models: the case of poverty and children's psychological adjustment. In: Little, T. D., Schnabel, K. U., Baumert, J. (eds.) Modeling Longitudinal and Multiple-Group Data: Practical Issues, Applied Approaches, and Scientific Examples, pp. 109-127. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2001).
75. Verbeke, G., Molenberghs, G.: Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. Springer, New York (2000).
76. Walls, T. A., Schafer, J. L.: Models of Intensive Longitudinal Data. Oxford University Press, London (2006).
77. Wang, L., McArdle, J. J.: A simulation study comparison of Bayesian estimation with conventional methods for estimating unknown change points. Struct. Equ. Model. 15(1), 52-74 (2008).