Pixels, blocks of pixels, and polygons: Choosing a spatial unit for thematic accuracy assessment

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 115, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 3044-3055

  Stehman, Stephen V ^a   Wickham, James D ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster sampling; Land cover; Location error; Response design; Stratified sampling

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER SAMPLING; LAND COVER; LOCATION ERROR; RESPONSE DESIGNS; STRATIFIED SAMPLING;

DESIGN; PIXELS; POPULATION STATISTICS;

RATING;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ERROR ANALYSIS; HOMOGENEITY; LAND COVER; MAPPING METHOD; PIXEL; POLYGON; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; THEMATIC MAPPING;

EID: 81355138730     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson J.R., Hardy E.E., Roach J.T., Witmer R.E. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. U.S. Geological Survey professional paper 1976, 964. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC, 28 pp.
2. Binaghi E., Brivio P.A., Ghezzi P., Rampini A. A fuzzy set-based accuracy assessment of soft classification. Pattern Recognition Letters 1999, 20:935-948.
3. Card D.H. Using known map category marginal frequencies to improve estimates of thematic map accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1982, 48:431-439.
4. Cochran W.G. Sampling techniques 1977, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 3rd ed.
5. Congalton R.G., Green K. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices 1999, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
6. Congalton R.G., Green K. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices 2008, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 2nd ed.
7. Czaplewski R.L. Accuracy assessment of maps of forest condition: Statistical design and methodological considerations. Remote sensing of forest environments: Concepts and case studies 2003, 115-140. Kluuwer Academic Publishers, Boston. M.A. Wulder, S.E. Franklin (Eds.).
8. Dungan J.L. Focusing on feature-based differences in map comparison. Journal of Geographical Systems 2006, 8:131-143.
9. Fry J.A., Coan M.J., Homer C.G., Meyer D.K., Wickham J.D. Completion of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 1992-2001 land cover change retrofit product. U. S. Geological Survey open-file report 2088-1379 2009, available from, accessed April 2011. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1379.
10. Hargrove W.W., Hoffman F.M., Hessburg P.F. Mapcurves: A quantitative method for comparing categorical maps. Journal of Geographical Systems 2006, 8:187-208.
11. Homer C., Dewitz J., Fry J., Coan M., Hossain N., Larson C., et al. Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2007, 73:337-341.
12. Janssen L.L.F., van der Wel F.J.M. Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: A review. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1994, 60:419-426.
13. Ji L., Gallo K. An agreement coefficient for image comparison. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2006, 72:823-833.
14. Kuzera K., Pontius R.G. Categorical coefficients for assessing soft-classified maps at multiple resolutions. Proceedings of the joint meeting of the 15th annual conference of the International Environmetrics Society and the 6th annual symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in the Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, 28 June-1 July 2004, Portland, ME 2004.
15. Lewis H.G., Brown M. A generalized confusion matrix for assessing area estimates from remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2001, 22:3223-3235.
16. Lohr S.L. Sampling: Design and analysis 1999, Duxbury Press, New York.
17. McRoberts R.E. The effects of rectification and global positioning system errors on satellite image-based estimates of forest area. Remote Sensing of Environment 2010, 114:1710-1717.
18. Overton W.S., Stehman S.V. The Horvitz-Thompson theorem as a unifying perspective for probability sampling: With examples from natural resource sampling. The American Statistician 1995, 49:261-268.
19. Pontius R.G., Cheuk M.L. A generalized cross-tabulation matrix to compare soft-classified maps at multiple spatial resolutions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2006, 20:1-30.
20. Pontius R.G., Malizia N.R. Effect of category aggregation on map comparison. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3234: Proceedings of the Third International Conference, GIScience 2004 2004, 251-268. Springer, Adelphi, Maryland (USA). M.J. Egenhofer, C. Freksa, H.J. Miller (Eds.).
21. Pontius R.G., Thontteh O., Chen H. Components of information for multiple resolution comparison between maps that share a real variable. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 2008, 15:111-142.
22. Power C., Simms A., White R. Hierarchical fuzzy pattern matching for the regional comparison of land use maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2001, 15:77-100.
23. Richards J.A. Classifier performance and map accuracy. Remote Sensing of Environment 1996, 57:161-166.
24. Riemann R., Wilson B.T., Lister A., Parks S. An effective assessment protocol for continuous geospatial datasets of forest characteristics using USFS Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data. Remote Sensing of Environment 2010, 114:2337-2352.
25. Särndal C.E., Swensson B., Wretman J. Model-Assisted Survey Sampling 1992, Springer-Verlag, New York.
26. Smith S.V., Renwick W.H., Bartly J.D., Buddemeier R.W. Distribution and significance of small, artificial water bodies across the United States landscape. The Science of the Total Environment 2002, 299:21-36.
27. Stehman S.V. Estimating the kappa coefficient and its variance under stratified random sampling. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1996, 62:401-407.
28. Stehman S.V. Estimating standard errors of accuracy assessment statistics under cluster sampling. Remote Sensing of Environment 1997, 60:258-269.
29. Stehman S.V. Basic probability sampling designs for thematic map accuracy assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1999, 20:2423-2441.
30. Stehman S.V. Statistical rigor and practical utility in thematic map accuracy assessment. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2001, 67:727-734.
31. Stehman S.V. Sampling designs for accuracy assessment of land cover. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2009, 30:5243-5272.
32. Stehman S.V., Czaplewski R.L. Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment: Fundamental principles. Remote Sensing of Environment 1998, 64:331-344.
33. Stehman S.V., Foody G.M. "Accuracy assessment" (Chapter 21). The SAGE handbook of remote sensing 2009, 297-309. Sage Publications Ltd, London. T.A. Warner, M.D. Nellis, G.M. Foody (Eds.).
34. Story M., Congalton R.G. Accuracy assessment: A user's perspective. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1986, 52:397-399.
35. Strahler A.H., Boschetti L., Foody G.M., Friedl M.A., Hansen M.C., Herold M., et al. Global land cover validation: Recommendations for evaluation and accuracy assessment of global land cover maps. EUR 22156 EN - DG 2006, Office for official publications of the European communities, Luxembourg, 48 pp.
36. White R. Pattern based map comparisons. Journal of Geographical Systems 2006, 8:145-164.
37. Willmott C. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 1982, 63:1309-1313.
38. Willmott C.J., Matsuura K. On the use of dimensioned measures of error to evaluate the performance of spatial interpolators. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2006, 20:89-102.