Integrating technology addiction and use: An empirical investigation of online auction users

MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1043-1061

  Turel, Ofir ^a   Serenko, Alexander ^b   Giles, Paul ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Hardy Giles Consulting   (Canada)

Author keywords

Addiction; Enjoyment; Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation; IT continuance; Obsessive compulsive behavior; Online auction; Technology addiction; User behavior

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

ADDICTION; ENJOYMENT; EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION; IT CONTINUANCE; OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR; ONLINE AUCTIONS; TECHNOLOGY ADDICTIONS; USER BEHAVIORS;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 81355132789     PISSN: 02767783     EISSN: 21629730     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/41409972     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. 1992. "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace," Journal of Applied and Social Psychology (22:14), pp. 1111-1132.
2. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W. 2003. "Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model," MIS Quarterly (27:1), pp. 51-90.
3. Harman, H. H. 1976. Modern Factor Analysis (3rd ed,.), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
4. Lindell, M. K., and Whitney, D. J. 2001. "Accounting for Common Method Variance in Cross-Sectional Research Designs," Journal of Applied Psychology (86:1), pp. 114-121. (Pubitemid 33404733)
5. Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., and Patil, A. 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science (52:12), pp. 1865-1883. (Pubitemid 44927001)
6. Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I. 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research (2:3), pp. 192-222.
7. Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H. G., and Xue, Y. J. 2007. "Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective," MIS Quarterly (31:1), pp. 105-136.
8. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. "Common Method Bias in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies," Journal of Applied Psychology (88:5), pp. 879-903. (Pubitemid 37239703)
9. Reynolds, W. M. 1982. "Development of Reliable and Valid Short Forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale," Journal of Clinical Psychology (38:1), pp. 119-125. (Pubitemid 12135561)
10. Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., and Sturman, M. C. 2009. "A Tale of Three Perspectives Examining Post Hoc Statistical Techniques for Detection and Correction of Common Method Variance," Organizational Research Methods (12:4), pp. 762-800.
11. Sharma, R., Yetton, P., and Crawford, J. 2009. "Estimating the Effect of Common Method Variance: The Method-Method Pair Technique with an Illustration from TAM Research," MIS Quarterly (33:3), pp 473-490.
12. Straub, D. W. 2009. "Creating Blue Oceans of Thought Via Highly Citable Articles," MIS Quarterly (33:4), pp. iii-vii.