메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1669-1721

Modernizing divorce jurisdiction: Same-sex couples and minimum contacts

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 81355123618     PISSN: 00068047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (19)

References (99)
  • 1
    • 81355144916 scopus 로고
    • Equality and difference: A perspective on no-fault divorce and its aftermath
    • Herma Hill Kay
    • See Herma Hill Kay, Equality and Difference: A Perspective on No-Fault Divorce and Its Aftermath, 56 U.ClN.L. REV. 1,5(1987).
    • (1987) U. ClN.L. REV. , vol.56 , Issue.1 , pp. 5
  • 3
    • 81355158641 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developments in the law - State-court jurisdiction
    • Developments in the Law - State-Court Jurisdiction, 73 HARV. L. REV.
    • Harv. L. Rev. , vol.73
  • 4
    • 81355127920 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rethinking rules of conflict of laws in marriage and divorce in the United States: What can we learn from europe?
    • Linda Silberman, Rethinking Rules of Conflict of Laws in Marriage and Divorce in the United States: What Can We Learn from Europe?, 82 TUL. L. REV. 1999, 2008 (2008)
    • (2008) Tul. L. Rev. 1999, 2008 , vol.82
    • Silberman, L.1
  • 5
    • 81355127876 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Divorce and domicile: Time to sever the knot
    • Rhonda Wasserman, Divorce and Domicile: Time to Sever the Knot, 39 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1, 1 (1997).
    • (1997) Wm. & Mary L. Rev. , vol.39 , Issue.1 , pp. 1
    • Wasserman, R.1
  • 6
    • 81355162141 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • I borrow this term from mary patricia byrn and morgan holcomb
    • I borrow this term from Mary Patricia Byrn and Morgan Holcomb, Wedlocked, FAM. CT. REV. 2011.
    • (2011) Wedlocked, Fam. Ct. Rev.
  • 8
    • 81355127918 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions valid in new mexico?
    • (January 4, 2011)
    • see also Are Same-Sex Marriages Performed in Other Jurisdictions Valid in New Mexico?, N.M. Att'y Gen. Op. No. 11-01 (January 4, 2011), available at http://www.nmag.gov/Opinions/Opinion.aspx?OpID=l 131
    • N.M. Att'y Gen. Op. No. 11- 01 , pp. 131
  • 9
    • 81355162130 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The difference the mini-domas make
    • See, e.g., Andrew Koppelman, The Difference the Mini-DOMAs Make, 38 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 265, 265 (2007).
    • (2007) Loy. U. Chi. L.J. , vol.38 , Issue.265 , pp. 265
    • Koppelman, A.1
  • 14
    • 11344253315 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Covenant marriage and the conflict of laws
    • see also Katherine Shaw Spaht & Symeon C. Symeonides, Covenant Marriage and the Conflict of Laws, 32 CREIGHTON L. REV. 1085, (1999)
    • (1999) Creighton L. Rev. , vol.32 , pp. 1085
    • Spaht, K.S.1    Symeonides, S.C.2
  • 16
    • 79958040359 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Critical directions in comparative family law: Genealogies and contemporary studies of family law exceptionalism
    • Janet Halley & Kerry Rittich, Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law: Genealogies and Contemporary Studies of Family Law Exceptionalism, 58 AM. J. COMP. L. 753, 753 (2010)
    • (2010) Am. J. Comp. L. , vol.58 , Issue.753 , pp. 753
    • Halley, J.1    Rittich, K.2
  • 17
    • 78650809169 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Note, 'til death do you part⋯ and this time we mean it: Denial of access to divorce for same-sex couples
    • Byrn & Holcomb, supra note 11, and Colleen McNichols Ramais, Note, 'Til Death Do You Part⋯ And This Time We Mean It: Denial of Access to Divorce for Same-Sex Couples, 2010 U. ILL. L. REV. 1013.
    • (2010) U. Ill. L. Rev. , pp. 1013
  • 18
    • 81355127914 scopus 로고
    • Developments in the law - Rights associated with divorce and child custody relationships
    • See, e.g., Developments in the Law - Rights Associated with Divorce and Child Custody Relationships, 93 HARV. L. REV. 1308, 1310 (1980)
    • (1980) Harv. L. Rev. , vol.93 , Issue.1308 , pp. 1310
  • 19
    • 1542522411 scopus 로고
    • Constitutional protection for personal lifestyles
    • J. Harvie Wilkinson & Edward White, Constitutional Protection for Personal Lifestyles, 62 CORNELL L. REV. 563,574-75 (1977).
    • (1977) Cornell L. Rev. , vol.62 , Issue.563 , pp. 574-575
    • Harvie Wilkinson, J.1    White, E.2
  • 20
    • 81355127907 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Same-sex divorce in the conflict of laws
    • Herma Hill Kay
    • See, e.g., Herma Hill Kay, Same-Sex Divorce in the Conflict of Laws, 15 KING'S C. L.J. 63, 71 (2004)
    • (2004) King'S C. L.J. , vol.15 , Issue.63 , pp. 71
  • 21
    • 81355158631 scopus 로고
    • The transitory divorce action: Jurisdiction in the no-fault era
    • Helen Garfield, The Transitory Divorce Action: Jurisdiction in the No-Fault Era, 58 TEX. L. REV. 501, 502(1980)
    • (1980) Tex. L. Rev. , vol.58 , Issue.501 , pp. 502
    • Garfield, H.1
  • 22
    • 26244452611 scopus 로고
    • Parents partners and personal jurisdiction
    • Rhonda Wasserman, Parents, Partners, and Personal Jurisdiction, 1995 U. ILL. L. REV. 813.
    • (1995) U. Ill. L. Rev. , pp. 813
    • Wasserman, R.1
  • 23
    • 81355162112 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What is the global family? Family law in decolonization, modernization and globalization
    • Ann Shalleck, What is the Global Family? Family Law in Decolonization, Modernization and Globalization, 19 AM. U. J. GENDER SOC. POL'Y & L. 449,451 (2011).
    • (2011) Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol'Y & L. , vol.19 , Issue.449 , pp. 451
    • Shalleck, A.1
  • 24
    • 81355158618 scopus 로고
    • And full faith and credit to divorce decrees: A critique
    • See, e.g., John R. McDonough, Jr., Mr. Justice Jackson and Full Faith and Credit to Divorce Decrees: A Critique, 56 COLUM. L. REV. 860, 860 (1956)
    • (1956) Colum. L. Rev. , vol.56 , Issue.860 , pp. 860
    • McDonough Jr., J.R.1    Jackson, J.2
  • 25
    • 81355162131 scopus 로고
    • Divorce problems in the conflict of laws
    • See, e.g., Herbert F. Goodrich, Divorce Problems in the Conflict of Laws, 2 TEX. L. REV. 1, 3-4 (1923)
    • (1923) Tex. L. Rev. , vol.2 , Issue.1 , pp. 3-4
    • Goodrich, H.F.1
  • 26
    • 79955874715 scopus 로고
    • Divorce jurisdiction and recognition of divorce decrees - A comparative study
    • Erwin N. Griswold, Divorce Jurisdiction and Recognition of Divorce Decrees - A Comparative Study, 65 HARV. L. REV. 193 (1951)
    • (1951) Harv. L. Rev. , vol.65 , pp. 193
    • Griswold, E.N.1
  • 27
    • 81355162120 scopus 로고
    • Extraterritorial divorce - Williams v. North Carolina II
    • Ernest G. Lorenzen, Extraterritorial Divorce - Williams v. North Carolina II, 54 YALE L.J. 799 (1945)
    • (1945) Yale L.J. , vol.54 , pp. 799
    • Lorenzen, E.G.1
  • 28
    • 77952070370 scopus 로고
    • And repent at leisure
    • Thomas Reed Powell, And Repent at Leisure, 58 HARV. L. REV. 930(1945).
    • (1945) Harv. L. Rev. , vol.58 , pp. 930
    • Reed, P.T.1
  • 29
    • 11544350012 scopus 로고
    • Full faith and credit for divorce decrees - Present doctrine and possible changes
    • James D. Sumner, Jr., Full Faith and Credit for Divorce Decrees - Present Doctrine and Possible Changes, 9 VAND. L. REV. 1,1 (1955).
    • (1955) Vand. L. Rev. , vol.9 , Issue.1 , pp. 1
    • Sumner Jr., J.D.1
  • 30
    • 84937300655 scopus 로고
    • Note "Some of the most embarrassing questions": Extraterritorial divorces and the problem of jurisdiction before pennoyer
    • Michael M. O'Hear, Note, "Some of the Most Embarrassing Questions": Extraterritorial Divorces and the Problem of Jurisdiction Before Pennoyer, 104 YALE L.J. 1507, 1529 (1995)
    • (1995) Yale L.J. , vol.104 , Issue.1507 , pp. 1529
    • O'Hear, M.M.1
  • 33
    • 78649499585 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Regulating polygamy: Intimacy, default rules, and bargaining for equality
    • See Adrienne D. Davis, Regulating Polygamy: Intimacy, Default Rules, and Bargaining for Equality, 110 COLUM. L. REV. 1955, 2010-11 (2010).
    • (2010) Colum. L. Rev. 1955, 2010-11 , vol.110
    • Davis Adrienne, D.1
  • 34
    • 1842759929 scopus 로고
    • Family law in the fifty states
    • Linda D. Elrod & Timothy B. Walker, Family Law in the Fifty States, 27 FAM. L.Q. 515, 661 (1994).
    • (1994) Fam. L.Q. , vol.27 , Issue.515 , pp. 661
    • Elrod Linda, D.1    Walker, T.B.2
  • 36
    • 81355127893 scopus 로고
    • The supreme court introduced the so-called "divisible divorce doctrine"
    • The Supreme Court introduced the so-called "divisible divorce doctrine" in Estin v. Estin, 334 U.S. 541, 549 (1948).
    • (1948) Estin v. Estin 334 U.S. , vol.541 , pp. 549
  • 37
    • 77957156622 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A review of the year in family law: Looking at interjurisdictional recognition
    • Linda D. Elrod & Robert G. Spector, A Review of the Year in Family Law: Looking at Interjurisdictional Recognition, 43 FAM. L.Q. 923, 976 (2010)
    • (2010) Fam. L.Q. , vol.43 , Issue.923 , pp. 976
    • Elrod, L.D.1    Spector, R.G.2
  • 38
    • 81355127902 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Relying on its reverse evasion statute
    • Relying on its reverse evasion statute, MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 207, § 11 (2006)
    • (2006) Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 207, § , vol.11
  • 39
    • 77951971461 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Marriage equality for same-sex couples: Where we are and where we are going
    • Jennifer L. Levi, Marriage Equality for Same-Sex Couples: Where We Are and Where We Are Going, 22 J. AM. ACAD. MATRIMONIAL L. 55, 76-77 (2009).
    • (2009) J. Am. Acad. Matrimonial L. , vol.22 , Issue.55 , pp. 76-77
    • Levi Jennifer, L.1
  • 41
    • 84863681080 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Press Release, U.S. Census Bureau, (Sept. 27, 2011)
    • See, e.g., Press Release, U.S. Census Bureau, Census Bureau Releases Estimates of Same-Sex Married Couples (Sept. 27, 2011), available at http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/2010-census/cbll-cnl81.html
    • Census Bureau Releases Estimates of Same-Sex Married Couples
  • 47
    • 81355158630 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Update on connecticut cases involving same-sex partners
    • Dec. 6
    • See, e.g., Susan Price-Livingston, Update on Connecticut Cases Involving Same-Sex Partners, CONN. GEN'L ASSEMBLY OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH (Dec. 6, 2002), http://www.cga.ct.gov/2002/olrdata/jud/rpt/2002-R-0952.htm.
    • (2002) Conn. Gen'L Assembly Office Of Legislative Research
    • Price-Livingston, S.1
  • 48
    • 77954725473 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Two ways to end a marriage: Divorce or death
    • Laura A. Rosenbury, Two Ways to End a Marriage: Divorce or Death, 2005 UTAH L. REV. 1227-1230
    • (2005) Utah L. Rev. , pp. 1227-1230
    • Rosenbury, L.A.1
  • 49
    • 18944398438 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A review of the year in family law: Same-Sex
    • FAM. L.Q.
    • See, e.g., Linda D. Elrod & Robert G. Spector, A Review of the Year in Family Law: "Same-Sex" Marriage Issues Dominates Headlines, 38 FAM. L.Q. 777, 803-05 (2005)
    • (2005) Marriage Issues Dominates Headlines , vol.38 , Issue.777 , pp. 803-805
    • Elrod, L.D.1    Spector, R.G.2
  • 50
    • 81355144890 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Tate caregiving and the case for testamentary freedom
    • Joshua C. Tate, Caregiving and the Case for Testamentary Freedom, 42 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 129, 160 (2008)
    • (2008) U.C. Davis L. Rev. , vol.42 , Issue.129 , pp. 160
    • Joshua, C.1
  • 52
    • 38349011313 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Postnuptial agreements
    • See, e.g., Sean Hannon Williams, Postnuptial Agreements, 2007 Wis. L. REV. 827,832.
    • (2007) Wis. L. Rev. , Issue.827 , pp. 832
    • Williams, S.H.1
  • 53
    • 81355162098 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Debts, divorce, and disarray in bankruptcy
    • See, e.g., Margaret M. Mahoney, Debts, Divorce, and Disarray in Bankruptcy, 73 UMKC L. REV. 83, 86 (2004).
    • (2004) Umkc L. Rev. , vol.73 , Issue.83 , pp. 86
    • Mahoney, M.M.1
  • 54
    • 81355127901 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Providing that the non-debtor spouse will not be liable for debt incurred by the other spouse after separation
    • See, e.g., CAL. FAM. CODE § 910 (2008) (providing that the non-debtor spouse will not be liable for debt incurred by the other spouse after separation).
    • (2008) Cal. Fam. Code , vol.910
  • 55
    • 81355162128 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 967 P.2d Haw. Ct. App. 1998
    • See, e.g., Queen's Medical Ctr. v. Kagawa, 967 P.2d 686, 699-700 (Haw. Ct. App. 1998)
    • Queen's Medical Ctr. v. Kagawa , vol.686 , pp. 699-700
  • 56
    • 81355144898 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Emens, monogamy's Law: Compulsory monogamy and polyamorous existence 29
    • Elizabeth F. Emens, Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence, 29 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 277,290 n.51 (2004).
    • (2004) N.Y.U. Rev.L. & Soc. Change , vol.277-290 , Issue.51
    • Elizabeth, F.1
  • 57
    • 16244415231 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bargaining or biology? the history and future of paternity law and parental status
    • See, e.g., Katharine K. Baker, Bargaining or Biology? The History and Future of Paternity Law and Parental Status, 14 CORNELL J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 1, 7 n.22 (2004)
    • (2004) Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'Y 1 , vol.14 , Issue.7 , pp. 22
    • Baker, K.K.1
  • 58
    • 85048929591 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The framework of full faith and credit and interstate recognition of same-sex marriages
    • see also William A. Reppy, Jr., The Framework of Full Faith and Credit and Interstate Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages, 3 AVE MARIA L. REV. 393, 470-71 (2005)
    • (2005) Ave Maria L. Rev. , vol.3 , Issue.393 , pp. 470-471
    • Reppy Jr., W.A.1
  • 60
    • 1542447480 scopus 로고
    • Indiana: Birthplace of migratory divorce
    • Val Nolan, Jr., Indiana: Birthplace of Migratory Divorce, 26 IND. L.J. 515, 515(1951).
    • (1951) Ind. L.J. , vol.26 , Issue.515 , pp. 515
    • Nolan Jr., V.1
  • 61
    • 81355162127 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Uniformity and the recognition of ex parte divorces
    • See, e.g., Uniformity and the Recognition of Ex Parte Divorces, 44 YALE L.J. 488
    • Yale L.J. , vol.44 , pp. 488
  • 63
    • 84861733303 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Family Law Federalism: Divorce and the constitution 16
    • Ann Laquer Estin, Family Law Federalism: Divorce and the Constitution, 16 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 381, 385-86 (2007)
    • (2007) Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. , vol.381 , pp. 385-386
    • Estin, A.L.1
  • 64
    • 84930557722 scopus 로고
    • Extraterritorial recognition of divorce decrees in the nineteenth Century, 34
    • Neal R. Feigenson, Extraterritorial Recognition of Divorce Decrees in the Nineteenth Century, 34 AM. J. LEGAL HIST. 119, 121 (1990)
    • (1990) Am. J. Legal Hist. , vol.119 , pp. 121
    • Feigenson, N.R.1
  • 66
    • 81355144896 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • True in rem jurisdiction enables a court to adjudicate the interests of "all persons, known or unknown," in property
    • JACK H. FRIEDENTHAL ET AL. 3.8
    • True in rem jurisdiction enables a court to adjudicate the interests of "all persons, known or unknown," in property. JACK H. FRIEDENTHAL ET AL., CIVIL PROCEDURE § 3.8, at
    • Civil Procedure
  • 67
    • 81355127900 scopus 로고
    • 20 Ala. 644-645
    • See, e.g., Harrison v. Harrison, 20 Ala. 629, 644-45 (1852)
    • (1852) Harrison v. Harrison , pp. 629
  • 69
    • 78249286636 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interstate Recognition of Parentage in a Time of Disharmony: Same-Sex Parent Families and Beyond
    • See, e.g., Courtney G. Joslin, Interstate Recognition of Parentage in a Time of Disharmony: Same-Sex Parent Families and Beyond, 70 OHIO ST. L.J. 563, 571 (2009).
    • (2009) Ohio St. L.J. , vol.70 , Issue.563 , pp. 571
    • Joslin, C.G.1
  • 71
    • 81355162107 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Note Should the supreme court stop inviting amicus curiae to defend abandoned lower court decisions?, 63
    • Brian P. Goldman, Note, Should the Supreme Court Stop Inviting Amicus Curiae to Defend Abandoned Lower Court Decisions?, 63 STAN. L. REV. 907, 916- 17(2011).
    • (2011) Stan. L. Rev. , vol.907 , pp. 916-917
    • Goldman, B.P.1
  • 72
    • 81355144909 scopus 로고
    • S.W.2d 793 796 Ark.
    • See, e.g., Wheat v. Wheat, 318 S.W.2d 793, 796 (Ark. 1958)
    • (1958) Wheat v. Wheat , vol.318
  • 73
    • 67649606913 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • State courts, state territory, state power: Reflections on the extraterritoriality principle in choice of law and legislation 84
    • see also Katherine Florey, State Courts, State Territory, State Power: Reflections on the Extraterritoriality Principle in Choice of Law and Legislation, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1057,1064(2009).
    • (2009) Notre Dame L. Rev. , vol.1057 , pp. 1064
    • Florey, K.1
  • 74
    • 77950482274 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Essay embedded international law and the constitution abroad
    • Sarah H. Cleveland, Essay, Embedded International Law and the Constitution Abroad, 110 COLUM. L. REV. 225, 235 (2010);
    • (2010) Colum. L. Rev. , vol.110-225 , pp. 235
    • Cleveland, S.H.1
  • 75
    • 81355162094 scopus 로고
    • The federalism theme in personal jurisdiction
    • see also John N. Drobak, The Federalism Theme in Personal Jurisdiction, 68 IOWA L. REV. 1015, 1016 (1983)
    • (1983) Iowa L. Rev. , vol.68 , Issue.1015 , pp. 1016
    • Drobak, J.N.1
  • 76
    • 81355158629 scopus 로고
    • {Williams II), 325 U.S.
    • Williams v. North Carolina {Williams II), 325 U.S. 226,229 (1945).
    • (1945) Williams v. North Carolina , vol.226 , pp. 229
  • 77
    • 77950660033 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sovereignty not due process: Personal jurisdiction over nonresident alien defendants
    • Austen L. Parrish, Sovereignty, Not Due Process: Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Alien Defendants, 41 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 1, 12-13 (2006)
    • (2006) Wake Forest L. Rev. , vol.41 , Issue.1 , pp. 12-13
    • Parrish, A.L.1
  • 78
    • 19744363082 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The geography of justice
    • Kal Raustiala, The Geography of Justice, 73 FORDHAM L. REV. 2501, 2516 (2005).
    • (2005) Fordham L. Rev. , vol.73 , Issue.2501 , pp. 2516
    • Raustiala, K.1
  • 79
    • 81355162109 scopus 로고
    • U.S. 266. ("Although it is now settled that a suit for divorce is not an ordinary adversary proceeding, it does not promote analysis, as was recently pointed out, to label divorce proceedings as actions in rem."
    • Williams v. North Carolina (Williams II), 325 U.S. 266, 232 (1945) ("Although it is now settled that a suit for divorce is not an ordinary adversary proceeding, it does not promote analysis, as was recently pointed out, to label divorce proceedings as actions in rem."
    • (1945) Williams v. North Carolina (Williams II) , vol.325 , pp. 232
  • 80
    • 81355162108 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A "Minimum Interest" Approach To PersonalJurisdiction, 35
    • see also, e.g., Walter W. Heiser, A "Minimum Interest" Approach To PersonalJurisdiction, 35 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 915, 966 (2000).
    • (2000) Wake Forest L. Rev. , vol.915 , pp. 966
    • Heiser, W.W.1
  • 81
    • 0042030888 scopus 로고
    • The privatization of family law
    • Jana Singer, The Privatization of Family Law, 1992 Wis. L. REV. 1443, 1471.
    • (1992) Wis. L. Rev. , Issue.1443 , pp. 1471
    • Singer, J.1
  • 82
    • 0009899509 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Saving the family from the reformers, 31
    • See, e.g., Katharine T. Bartlett, Saving the Family from the Reformers, 31 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 809, 854 n.98 (1998)
    • (1998) U.C. Davis L. Rev. , vol.809 , Issue.98 , pp. 854
    • Bartlett, K.T.1
  • 83
    • 84926350487 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rocky rhodes, liberty, substantive due process, and personal jurisdiction
    • See, e.g., Charles W. "Rocky" Rhodes, Liberty, Substantive Due Process, and Personal Jurisdiction, 82 TUL. L. REV. 567, 570 (2007)
    • (2007) Tul. L. Rev. , vol.82 , Issue.567 , pp. 570
    • Charles, W.1
  • 84
    • 33745643603 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Jurisdiction to adjudicate: A revised analysis
    • See, e.g., A. Benjamin Spencer, Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: A Revised Analysis, 73 U. CHI. L. REV. 617, 623-24 (2006)
    • (2006) U. Chi. L. Rev. , vol.73 , Issue.617 , pp. 623-24
    • Spencer, A.B.1
  • 85
    • 84907857220 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Impersonal jurisdiction
    • Allan Erbsen, Impersonal Jurisdiction, 60 EMORY L.J. 1,7 (2010).
    • (2010) Emory L.J. , vol.60 , Issue.1 , pp. 7
    • Erbsen, A.1
  • 86
    • 54049099624 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What if the Beckhams Move to L.A. and divorce? marital property rights of mobile spouses when they divorce in the United States
    • J. Thomas Oldham, What if the Beckhams Move to L.A. and Divorce? Marital Property Rights of Mobile Spouses When they Divorce in the United States, 42 FAM. L.Q. 263, 280 (2008)
    • (2008) Fam. L.Q. , vol.42 , Issue.263 , pp. 280
    • Oldham, J.T.1
  • 87
    • 81355158619 scopus 로고
    • Understanding personal jurisdiction 25
    • William M. Richman, Understanding Personal Jurisdiction, 25 ARIZ. L. REV. 599, 612(1993).
    • (1993) Ariz. L. Rev. , Issue.599 , pp. 612
    • Richman, W.M.1
  • 88
    • 0039688641 scopus 로고
    • Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: A suggested analysis
    • See, e.g., id. at 613-15; see also Arthur T. von Mehren & Donald T. Trautman, Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: A Suggested Analysis, 79 HARV. L. REV. 1121 (1966).
    • (1966) Harv. L. Rev. , vol.79 , pp. 1121
    • Von, M.A.T.1    Trautman, D.T.2
  • 90
    • 79956359614 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The timing of minimum contacts
    • Todd David Peterson, The Timing of Minimum Contacts, 79 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 101, 109 (2010).
    • (2010) Geo. Wash. L. Rev. , vol.79 , Issue.101 , pp. 109
    • Peterson, T.D.1
  • 91
    • 79251551400 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Plausibly pleading personal jurisdiction
    • Jayne S. Ressler, Plausibly Pleading Personal Jurisdiction, 82 TEMP. L. REV. 627, (2009).
    • (2009) Temp. L. Rev. , vol.82 , pp. 627
    • Ressler, J.S.1
  • 92
    • 81355158610 scopus 로고
    • Note, Specific Jurisdiction and the 'Arise from or Relate to' Requirement ⋯What Does it Mean?, 50
    • See, e.g., Mark M. Maloney, Note, Specific Jurisdiction and the 'Arise from or Relate to' Requirement ⋯What Does it Mean?, 50 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1265, 1277-82 (1993);
    • (1993) Wash. & Lee L. Rev. , vol.1265 , pp. 1277-1282
    • Maloney, M.M.1
  • 95
    • 84874903127 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The personal jurisdiction problem overlooked in the national debate about Class Action Fairness 58
    • Carol Rice Andrews, The Personal Jurisdiction Problem Overlooked in the National Debate About "Class Action Fairness," 58 SMU L. REV. 1313,1364 (2005).
    • (2005) Smu L. Rev. , vol.1313 , pp. 1364
    • Andrews, C.R.1
  • 96
    • 0038373070 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Registration statutes personal jurisdiction and the problem of predictability
    • Lee Scott Taylor, Registration Statutes, Personal Jurisdiction, and the Problem of Predictability, 103 COLUM. L. REV. 1163,1187(2003).
    • (2003) Colum. L. Rev. , vol.103 , Issue.1163 , pp. 1187
    • Taylor, L.S.1
  • 97
    • 33845323733 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The perfect storm: Bankruptcy, choice of law, and same-sex marriage
    • Jackie Gardina, The Perfect Storm: Bankruptcy, Choice of Law, and Same-Sex Marriage, 86 B.U. L. REV. 881,903(2006).
    • (2006) B.U. L. Rev. , vol.86 , Issue.881 , pp. 903
    • Gardina, J.1
  • 98
    • 32944468858 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Covenant marriage seven years later: Its as yet unfulfilled promise
    • See, e.g., Katherine Shaw Spaht, Covenant Marriage Seven Years Later: Its As Yet Unfulfilled Promise, 65 LA. L. REV. 605, 605 (2005)
    • (2005) La. L. Rev. , vol.65 , Issue.605 , pp. 605
    • Spaht, K.S.1
  • 99
    • 81355158612 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Travel insurance: Protecting lesbian and gay parent families across state lines, 4
    • See, e.g., Courtney G. Joslin, Travel Insurance: Protecting Lesbian and Gay Parent Families Across State Lines, 4 HARV. L. & POL'Y REV. 31, 41-42 (2010)
    • (2010) Harv. L. & Pol'Y Rev. , vol.31 , pp. 41-42
    • Joslinn, C.G.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.