Peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis: Risks, benefits, and access issues

Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 428-432

  Sinnakirouchenan, Ramapriya ^a,b   Holley, Jean L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b Carle Physician Group   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic kidney disease; End stage renal disease; Tunneled catheters

Indexed keywords

ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; HEALTH CARE COST; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; REVIEW; SURVIVAL; VASCULAR ACCESS;

HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONITIS; RENAL DIALYSIS; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 81255197611     PISSN: 15485595     EISSN: 15485609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2011.09.001     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Stack A.G. Determinants of modality selection among incident US dialysis patients: results from a national study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002, 13:1279-1287.
2. Miskulin D.C., Meyer K.B., Athienites N.V., et al. Comorbidity and other factors associated with modality selection in incident dialysis patients: the CHOICE study. Am J Kidney Dis 2002, 39:324-336.
3. Jager K.J., Korevaar J.C., Dekker F.W. The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in the Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis 2004, 43:891-899.
4. Chaudhary K., Sangha H., Khanna R. Peritoneal dialysis first: rationale. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011, 6:447-456.
5. Linas S. Dialysis training in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2002, 40:208-209.
6. Ledebo I., Ronco C. The best dialysis therapy? Results from an international survey among nephrology professionals. Nephrol Dial Transplant Plus 2008, 1:403-408.
7. USRDS 2009 Annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States 2009, U.S. Renal Data System, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, Bethesda, MD.
8. Golper T. Patient education: can it maximize the success of therapy?. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001, 16:S20-S24.
9. Bloembergen W.E., Port F.K., Mauger E.A., Wolfe R.A. A comparison of mortality between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995, 6:177-183.
10. Vonesh E.F., Snyder J.J., Foley R.N., Collins A.J. The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2004, 66:2389-2401.
11. Heaf J.G., Lokkegaard H., Madsen M. Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to hemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002, 17:112-117.
12. Weinhandl E.D., Foley R.N., Gilbertson D.T., et al. Propensity-matched mortality comparison of incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010, 21:499-506.
13. Perl J., Wald R., McFarlane P., et al. Hemodialysis vascular access modifies the association between dialysis modality and survival. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011, 22:1113-1121.
14. Koch M, Kohnle M, Trapp R, Haastert B, Rump LC, Akers S. Comparable outcome of acute unplanned peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. In press.
15. Schaubel D.E., Blake P.G., Fenton S.S. Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2001, 60:1517-1524.
16. Moist L.M., Port F.K., Orzol S.M., et al. Predictors of loss of residual renal function among new dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000, 11:556-564.
17. Stack A.G., Molony D.A., Rahman N.S., Dosekun A., Murthy B. Impact of dialysis modality on survival of new ESRD patients with congestive heart failure in the United States. Kidney Int 2003, 64:1071-1079.
18. Ganesh S.K., Hulbert-Shearon T., Port F.K., Eagle K., Stack A.G. Mortality differences by dialysis modality among incident ESRD patients with and without coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003, 14:415-424.
19. Mattana J., Effiong C., Gooneratne R., Singhal P.C. Risk of fatal cerebrovascular accident in patients on peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997, 8:1342-1347.
20. Jaar B.G., Plantinga L.C., Crews D.C., et al. Timing, causes, predictors, and prognosis of switching from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis: a prospective study. BMC Nephrol 2009, 10:3.
21. Margetts P.J., Churchill D.N. Acquired ultrafiltration dysfunction in peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002, 13:2787-2794.
22. Mehrotra R., Chiu Y.W., Kalantar-Zadeh K., Vonesh E. The outcome of continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis are similar. Kidney Int 2009, 76:97-107.
23. Belasco A., Barbosa D., Bettencourt A.R., et al. Quality of life of family caregivers of elderly patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2006, 48:955-963.
24. Vanholder R., Herring P., Loo A.V., et al. Reduced incidence of acute renal graft failure in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis compared with hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1999, 33:934-940.
25. Goldfarb-Rumyantzev A.S., Hurdle J.F., Scandling J.D., et al. The role of pretransplantation renal replacement therapy modality in kidney allograft and recipient survival. Am J Kidney Dis 2005, 46:537-549.
26. Schwenger V, Dohler B, Morath C, Zeier M, Opelz G. The role of pretransplant dialysis modality on renal allograft outlook. Nephrol Dial Transplant. In press.
27. Rehman R., Schmidt R.J., Moss A.H. Ethical and legal obligation to avoid long-term tunneled catheter access. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009, 4:456-460.
28. Polkinghorne K.R., McDonald S.P., Atkins R.C., et al. Vascular access and all-cause mortality: a propensity score analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004, 15:477-486.
29. Marr K.A., Sexton D.J., Conlon P.J., et al. Catheter-related bacteremia and outcome of attempted catheter salvage in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med 1997, 127:275-277.
30. Hung A., Pupim L., Yu C., et al. Determinants of C-reactive protein in chronic hemodialysis patients: relevance of dialysis catheter utilization. Hemodial Int 2008, 12:236-243.
31. Lacson E., Lazarus J.M., Himmelfarb J., et al. Balancing fistula first with catheters last. Am J Kidney Dis 2007, 50:379-395.
32. Lok C.E. Fistula first initiative: advantages and pitfalls. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007, 2:1043-1053.
33. Strippoli G.F., Tong A., Johnson D., et al. Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004, 15:2735-2746.
34. Crabtree J.H. Selected best demonstrated practices in peritoneal dialysis access. Kidney Int 2006, 103:S27-S37.
35. Brown P.A., McCormick B.B., Knoll G., et al. Complications and catheter survival with prolonged embedding of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008, 23:2299-2303.
36. Wong L.P., Liebman S.E., Wakefield K.A., Messing S. Training of surgeons in peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in the United States: a national survey. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010, 5:1439-1446.
37. Zimmerman D.G. Presternal catheter design: an opportunity to capitalize on catheter immobilization. Adv Perit Dial 2009, 26:91-95.
38. Neissim S.J., Bargman J.M., Jassal S.V. Relationship between double-cuffed and single-cuffed PD catheters and the risk of peritonitis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010, 25:2310-2314.
39. Rubin H.R., Fink N.E., Plantinga L.C., et al. Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis. JAMA 2004, 291:697-703.
40. Fadem S.Z., Walker D.R., Abbott G., et al. Satisfaction with renal replacement therapy and education: the American Association of Kidney Patients survey. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011, 6:605-612.
41. Berger A., Edelsberg J., Inglese G.W., et al. Cost comparison of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease. Am J Manag Care 2009, 15:509-518.