Alcohol brand preferences of underage youth: Results from a pilot survey among a national sample

Substance Abuse

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 191-201

  Siegel, Michael ^a   De Jong, William ^a   Naimi, Timothy S ^b   Heeren, Timothy ^a   Rosenbloom, David L ^a   Ross, Craig ^c   Ostroff, Joshua ^c   Jernigan, David H ^d  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Virtual Media Resources   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Alcohol; Alcohol brands; Alcohol use; Youth

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; ARTICLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DATA COLLECTION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNET; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81255196362     PISSN: 08897077     EISSN: 15470164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2011.601250     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2008. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 2009. NIH Publication No. 09-7401.
2. Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010;59(SS-5):1-142.
3. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health andHuman Services,Office of the Surgeon General; 2007.
4. Bonnie RJ, O'Connell ME, eds. Committee on Developing a Strategy toReduce and PreventUnderage Drinking, National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Reducing Underage Drinking: A Collective Responsibility. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2004.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Alcohol-Related Disease Impact (ARDI). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2010. Available at: Http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/ardi/ homepage.aspx. Accessed June 23, 2010.
6. Roeber J, Green DL, Meurer KM, et al. Types of alcoholic beverages usually consumed by students in 9th-12th grades-four states, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:737-740.
7. Cremeens JL, Miller JW, Nelson DE, Brewer RD. Assessment of source and type of alcohol consumed by high school students: Analyses from four states. J Addict Med. 2009;3:204-210.
8. Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth. Youth Exposure to Alcohol Advertising on Television, 2001 to 2007. Washington, DC: Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth, Georgetown University; 2008.
9. Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth. It Can Be Done: Reductions in Youth Exposure to Alcohol Advertising in Magazines, 2001-2005. Washington, DC: Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth, Georgetown University; 2007.
10. Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth. Youth Exposure to Alcohol Advertising on Television and in National Magazines, 2001 to 2006. Washington, DC: Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth, Georgetown University; 2007.
11. Serdula MK, Mokdad AH, Byers T, Siegel PZ. Assessing alcohol consumption: Beverage-specific versus grouped-beverage questions. J Stud Alcohol. 1999;60:99-102. (Pubitemid 29001179)
12. Russell M, Welte JW, Barnes GM. Quantityfrequency measures of alcohol consumption: Beveragespecific vs global questions. Br J Addict. 1991;86:409-417.
13. Casswell S, Huckle T, Pledger M. Survey data need not underestimate alcohol consumption. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26:1561-1567. (Pubitemid 35192318)
14. Kerr WC, Greenfield TK. Distribution of alcohol consumption and expenditures and the impact of improved measurement on coverage of alcohol sales in the 2000 National Alcohol Survey. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:1714-1722. (Pubitemid 47393529)
15. Midanik L. The validity of self-reported alcohol consumption and alcohol problems: A literature review. Br J Addict. 1982;77:357-382. (Pubitemid 13189805)
16. Knowledge Networks. KnowledgePanel Design Summary. Menlo Park, CA: Knowledge Networks; 2009.
17. Heeren T, Edwards EM, Dennis JM, Rodkin S, Hingson RW, Rosenbloom DL. A comparison of results from an alcohol survey of a prerecruited Internet panel and the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008;32:222-229.
18. King C, Siegel M, Jernigan DH, et al. Adolescent exposure to alcohol advertising in magazines: An evaluation of advertising placement in relation to underage youth readership. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45:626-633.
19. M. Shanken Communications. The U.S. Beer Market: Impact Databank Review and Forecast. 2009 Edition. New York: M. Shanken Communications; 2009.