On terminating Poisson processes in some shock models

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 95, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 874-879

  Finkelstein, Maxim ^a,b   Marais, Francois ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE   (South Africa)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c CSC   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Laplace transform; Poisson process; Probability of termination; Shocks; Time of recovery

Indexed keywords

INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; HOMOGENEOUS POISSON PROCESS; POINT PROCESS; POISSON PROCESS; SHOCK MODELS; SHOCKS; SYSTEM FAILURES;

POISSON DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 81255190627     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kahle W, Wendt H. On a cumulative damage process and resulting first passage times. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 2004; 20: 17-26.
2. Rice J. On generalized shot noise. Advances in Applied Probability 1977; 9: 553-65.
3. Gut A. Cumulated shock models. Advances in Applied Probability 1990; 22: 504-7.
4. Gut A, Husler J. Realistic variation of shock models. Statistics and Probability Letters 2005; 74: 187-204. (Pubitemid 41070292)
5. Nakagawa T. Shocks and damage models in Reliability Theory. Springer; 2006.
6. Cha J, Finkelstein MS. On a terminating shock process with independent wear increments. Journal of Applied Probability 2009; 46: 353-62.
7. Aven T. Condition based replacement policies-a counting process approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1996; 51: 275-81. (Pubitemid 126349481)
8. Chiang JH, Yuan J. Optimal maintenance policy for a Markovian system under periodic inspection. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2001 ; 71: 165-72. (Pubitemid 32034821)
9. Chen J, Li Z. An extended extreme shock maintenance model for a deteriorating system. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2008 ; 93: 1123-9. (Pubitemid 351419255)
10. Montoro-Cazorla D, Perez-Ocon R, del Carmen Segovia M. Replacement policy in a system under shocks following a Markovian arrival process. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2009; 94: 497-502.
11. van der Weide JAM, Pandey MD, van Noortwijk JM. Discounted cost model for condition-based maintenance optimization. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2010; 95: 236-46.
12. Lam Yeh, Zhang Yuan Lin. A shock model for the maintenance problem of a repairable system. Computers & Operations Research 2004; 31: 1807-20.
13. Tang Ya-yong, Lam Yeh. A delta-shock maintenance model for a deteriorating system. European Journal of Operational Research 2006; 168: 541-56.
14. Finkelstein MS. Failure rate modeling for reliability and risk. Springer; 2008.
15. Barlow R, Proschan F. Statistical theory of reliability and life testing probability models. Holt: Rinehart and Winston; 1975.
16. Finkelstein MS, Zarudnij VI. Laplace transform methods and fast repair approximations for multiple availability and its generalizations. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 2002; 51: 168-77.
17. Finkelstein MS. Simple bounds for terminating Poisson and renewal processes. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2003; 113: 541-8.
18. Thompson WA. Point process models with applications to safety and reliability. Chapman and Hall; 1988.
19. Cox DR, Isham V. Point Processes. London: Chapman and Hall; 1984.
20. Ross SM. Stochastic Processes. John Wiley; 1996.
21. Venter JP. Survival with shocks. University of the Free State, M.Sc. thesis, 2007.
22. Beichelt FE, Fatti LP. Stochastic Processes and their Applications. Taylor and Francis; 2002.
23. Block HW, Borges W, Savits TH. Age dependent minimal repair. Journal of Applied Probability 1985; 22: 370-86.