On the importance of reporting public health programmes

Journal of Public Health

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 281-282

  Walter, Ulla ^a   Pott, Elisabeth ^b   Kliche, Thomas ^c  

^a Bundeszentrale fur gesundheitliche Aufklarung   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; EDITORIAL; FUNDING; GERMANY; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE;

EID: 81255185497     PISSN: 09431853     EISSN: 16132238     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10389-011-0426-2     Document Type: Editorial

References (3)

1. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N (2004) Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement 94:361-366 (Pubitemid 38269486)
2. Meerpohl JJ, Blümle A, Antes G, Ev E (2009) Leitlinien für Forschungsberichte sind auch für Leser medizinischer Fachartikel hilfreich. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 134:2078-2083. doi:10.1055/ s-0029-1237560
3. Strech D, Soltmann B, Weikert B, Bauer M, Pfennig A (2011) Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry 72(1):e1-e9