Privacy revisited? Old ideals, new realities, and their impact on biobank regimes

Poiesis und Praxis

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 9-24

  Bialobrzeski, Arndt ^a   Ried, Jens ^a   Dabrock, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81255185268     PISSN: 16156609     EISSN: 16156617     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10202-011-0094-x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Berlin I (1990) Four essays on liberty. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Carter I (2007) Positive and negative liberty. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato. stanford. edu/entries/liberty-positive-negative/ (accessed: 4 Feb. 2011).
3. Carter I, Kramer M, Steiner H (2007) Freedom: a philosophical anthology. Blackwell, Oxford.
4. Chadwick R, Berg K (2001) Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nat Rev Genet 2(4): 318-321.
5. Council of Europe (1997) Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine http://conventions. coe. int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164. htm (accessed: 3 Feb. 2011).
6. Council of Europe (2000) European anti-discrimination directive 2000/78/EC http://eur-lex. europa. eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ. do?uri=OJ: L: 2000: 303: 0016: 0022: EN: PDF (accessed: 4 Feb. 2011).
7. Council of Europe (2010) Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. http://conventions. coe. int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005. htm (accessed: 3 Feb. 2011).
8. Dabrock P (2006) Public health genetics and social justice. Commun Genet 9(1): 34-39.
9. Dabrock P (2008) Risikodimensionen genetischer Tests für Adipositas. Sozialethische Perspektiven. In: Hilbert A, Dabrock P, Rief W (eds) Gewichtige gene. Adipositas zwischen Prädisposition und Eigenverantwortung. Huber, Bern, pp 173-198.
10. Dabrock P, Klinnert L, Schardien S (2004) Menschenwürde und Lebensschutz. Herausforderungen theologischer Bioethik. Gütersloher Verlagshaus, Gütersloh.
11. Dabrock P, Taupitz J, Ried J (2011) Trust in biobanking. Dealing with ethical, legal and social issues in an emerging field of biotechnology. Springer, Berlin.
12. European Parliament, Council of the EU (1995) EU data protection directive 95/46/EC http://eur-lex. europa. eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ. do?uri=CELEX: 31995L0046: EN: HTML (accessed: 4 Feb. 2011).
13. Folayan MO, Mutengu-Kasirye L, Calazans G (2009) Participating in biomedical research. JAMA 302(20): 2201-2202.
14. German Ethics Council (2010) Human biobanks for research. Opinion. http://www. ethikrat. org/files/der_opinion_human-biobanks. pdf (accessed: 4 Feb. 2011).
15. Greene SM, Mazor KM, Gallagher TH (2009) Participating in biomedical research. JAMA 302(20): 2200.
16. Harris J (2005) Scientific research is a moral duty. J Med Ethics 31(4): 242-248.
17. Herrera CD (2003) Universal compulsory service in medical research. Theor Med Bioeth 24(3): 215-231.
18. Katz KA (2009) Participating in biomedical research. JAMA 302(20): 2200-2201.
19. Knoppers BM, Chadwick R (2005) Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics. Nat Rev Genet 6(1): 75-79.
20. Knoppers BM, Fecteau C (2003) Human genomic databases: a global public good? Eur J Health Law 10(1): 27-41.
21. Lemke T, Lohkamp C (2005) Formen und Felder genetischer Diskriminierung. Ein Überblick über empirische Studien und aktuelle Fälle. In: van den Daele W (ed) Biopolitik, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 45-70.
22. Luhmann N (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
23. Lunshof JE, Chadwick R, Church GM (2008a) Hippocrates revisited? Old ideals and new realities. Genom Med 2(1-2): 1-3.
24. Lunshof JE, Chadwick R, Vorhaus DB, Church GM (2008b) From genetic privacy to open consent. Nat Rev Genet 9: 406-411.
25. McNally E, Cambon-Thomsen A et al (2004) Ethical, legal and social aspects of genetic testing: research, development and clinical applications. A report. European Commission, Brussels.
26. Miller D (2006) The liberty reader. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
27. Murray TH (1997) Genetic exceptionalism and 'future diaries': is genetic information different from other medical information? In: Rothstein M (ed) Genetic secrets: protecting privacy and confidentiality in the genetic era. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 60-73.
28. OECD (2009) Guidelines on human biobanks and genetic research databases. http://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/41/47/44054609. pdf (accessed: 4 Feb. 2011).
29. Powell T, Rapkin BD, Weiss ES (2009) Participating in biomedical research. JAMA 302(20): 2201.
30. Rawls J (1987) The idea of an overlapping consensus. Oxford J Legal Stud 7(1): 1-25.
31. Rawls J (1988) The priority of right and ideas of the good. Philos Public Affairs 17(4): 251-276.
32. Rawls J (2005) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
33. Ricoeur P (1992) Oneself as another. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
34. Rössler B (2005) The value of privacy. Polity Press, Cambridge.
35. Schaefer GO, Emanuel EJ, Wertheimer A (2009) The obligation to participate in biomedical research. JAMA 302(1): 67-72.
36. Ursin L Ø (2008) Biobank research and the right to privacy. Theor Med Bioeth 29(4): 267-285.
37. Walzer M (1983) Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. Basic Books, New York.
38. Wilson JMG, Jungner G (1968) The principles and practice of screening for disease. WHO, Geneva.
39. World Medical Association (2008) Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. http://www. wma. net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index. html (accessed: 4 Feb. 2011).