Outcome measurement in cognitive neurorehabilitation

Cognitive Neurorehabilitation

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 91-105

  Lincoln, Nadina ^a   Das Nair, Roshan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Neurology and clinical neuroscience; Neuropsychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 81255180577     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316529898.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (119)

1. Alderson, A. L., & Novack, T. A. (2003). Reliable serial measurement of cognitive processes in rehabilitation: the cognitive log. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 668-672.
2. Azouvi, P., Marchal, F., Samuel, C. et al. (1996). Functional consequences and awareness of unilateral neglect: study of an evaluation scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 6, 133-150.
3. Beatty, W. W., & Monson, N. (1991). Metamemory in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 309-327.
4. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory Manual (2nd Edition). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
5. Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., &Gilson, B. S. (1981). The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 19, 787-805.
6. Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. F., Fitzgerald, P., & Parkes, K. R. (1982). The Cognitive FailuresQuestionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1-16.
7. Brosseau, L., & Wolfson, C. (1994). The inter-rater reliability and construct validity of the Functional Independence Measure for multiple sclerosis subjects. Clinical Rehabilitation, 8, 107-115.
8. Burgess, P. W., Alderman, N., Evans, J., Emslie, H., & Wilson, B. A. (1998). The ecological validity of tests of executive function. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 547-558.
9. Carr, J. H., Shepherd, R. B., Nordholm, L., & Lynne, D. (1985). Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical Therapy, 65, 175-180.
10. Cella, D. F., Dineen, K., Arnason, B. et al. (1996). Validation of the Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis quality of life instrument. Neurology, 47, 129-139.
11. Chan, R. C. K. (2000). Attentional deficits in patients with closed head injury: a further study to the discriminative validity of the test of everyday attention. Brain Injury, 14, 227-236.
12. Charlton, J. R. H., Patrick, D. L., & Peach, H. (1983). Use of multi-variate measures of disability in health surveys. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 37, 296-304.
13. Chaytor, N., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychological Review, 13, 181-197.
14. Cicerone, K. D. (2002). Remediation of ‘working attention’ in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 16, 185-195.
15. Collen, F. M., Wade, D. T., Robb, G. F., & Bradshaw, C. M. (1991). The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. International Disability Studies, 13, 50-54.
16. Collin, C., Wade, D. T., Davis, S., & Home, V. (1988). The Barthel Index: a reliability study. International Disability Studies, 10, 61-63.
17. Cornish, I. M. (2000). Factor structure of the Everyday Memory Questionnaire. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 427-438.
18. Crawford, S., Wenden, F. J., & Wade, D. T. (1996). The Rivermead Head Injury Follow-up Questionnaire: a study of a new rating scale and other measures to evaluate outcome after head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 60, 510-514.
19. Cummings, J.L., Mega, M., Gray, K. et al. (1994). The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology, 44, 2308-2314.
20. Dallmeijer, A., Dekker, J., Roorda, L. et al. (2005). Differential itemfunctioning of the functional independencemeasure in higher performing neurological patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 346-352.
21. Davis, A. M., Cockburn, J. M., Wade, D. T., & Smith, P. T. (1995). A subjective memory assessment questionnaire for use with elderly people after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 9, 238-244.
22. Dickson, H. G.,&Kohler, F. (1996). Themulti-dimensionality of the FIMmotor items precludes an interval scaling using Rasch analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 26, 159-162.
23. Doble, S. E., Fisk, J. D., Fisher, A. G., Ritvo, P. O., & Murray, T. J. (1994). Functional competence of community dwelling persons with multiple sclerosis using the assessment of motor and process skills. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 843-851.
24. Doble, S. E., Fisk, J. D., Lewis, M., & Rockwood, K. (1999). Test-retest reliability of the assessment of motor and process skills in elderly adults. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 19, 203-215.
25. Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care, 44, 166-206.
26. Forster, A., & Young, J. (1996). Specialist nurse support for patients with stroke in the community: a randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 312, 1642-1646.
27. Franzen, M. D., & Wilhelm, K. L. (1996). Conceptual foundations of ecological validity in neuropsychology. In R. J. Sbordone & C. J. Long (Eds.), Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing (pp. 91-112). Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St Lucie Press.
28. Freeman, J. A., Langdon, D. W., & Thompson, A. J. (1996). Health related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis undergoing in-patient rehabilitation. Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation, 10, 185-194.
29. Fuller, K. J., Dawson, K., & Wiles, C. M. (1996). Physiotherapy in chronic multiple sclerosis: a controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 10, 195-204.
30. Gilewski, M. J., Zelinski, E. M., & Schaie, K. W. (1990). The Memory Functioning Questionnaire for assessment of memory complaints in adulthood and old age. Psychology and Aging, 5, 482-490.
31. Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). A User’s Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFERNelson.
32. Gouvier, W. D., Blanton, P. D., LaPorte, K. K., & Nepomuceno, C. (1987). Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, 94-97.
33. Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Sherwin, F. S. (1986). Guide for Use of the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation. Buffalo, NY: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Buffalo General Hospital.
34. Hagen, C., Malkmus, D., & Durham, P. (1972). Levels of Cognitive Functioning. Downey, CA: Rancho Los Amigos Hospital.
35. Hall, K. M. (1992). Overview of functional assessment scales in brain injury rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation, 2, 98-113.
36. Hall, K. M., Hamilton, B. B., Gordon, W. A., & Zasler, N. D. (1993). Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure and Functional Assessment Measure. Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 60-71.
37. Hanks, R. A., Rapport, L. J., Millis, S. R., & Deshpande, S. A. (1999). Measures of executive functioning as predictors of functional ability and social integration in a rehabilitation sample. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1030-1037.
38. Hanten, G., Bartha, M., & Levin, H. S. (2000). Metamemory following pediatric traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 18, 383-398.
39. Hartman-Maeir, A., & Katz, N. (1995). Validity of the Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT): relationships with functional tasks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 507-516.
40. Harwood, R. H., Rogers, A., Dickinson, E., & Ebrahim, S. (1994). Measuring handicap: London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Quality Health Care, 3, 11-16.
41. Heinemann, A. W. (2005). Putting outcome measurement in context: a rehabilitation psychology perspective. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 6-14.
42. Higginson, C. I., Arnett, P. A., & Voss, W. D. (2000). The ecological validity of clinical tests of memory and attention in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 185-204.
43. Hill, S., &Harries, U. (1994). Assessing the Outcome of Health Care for the Older Person in Community Settings: Should we use the SF-36? Leeds, UK: Clearing House on Health Outcomes, Nuffield Institute for Health.
44. Hobart, J., Lamping, D., Fitzpatrick, R., Riazi, A., & Thompson, A. (2001a). The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): a new patient-based outcome measure. Brain, 124, 962-973.
45. Hobart, J. C., Lamping, D. L., Freeman, J. A. et al. (2001b). Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology, 57, 639-644.
46. Holbrook, M., & Skilbeck, C. E. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12, 166-170.
47. Holland, A. L., Frattali, C. M., & Fromm, D. (1999). Communication Activities for Daily Living (2nd Edition). Austin, TX: Pro-E.
48. Houlden, H., Edwards, M., McNeil, J., & Greenwood, R. (2006). Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20, 153-159.
49. Indredavik, B., Bakke, F., Solberg, R. et al. (1991). Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 22, 1026-1031.
50. Jette, A., & Haley, S. (2005). Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 339-345.
51. Juby, L. C., Lincoln, N. B., Berman, P. et al. (1996). The effect of a stroke rehabilitation unit on functional and psychological outcome: a randomised controlled trial. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 6, 106-110.
52. Kidd, D., Stewart, G., Baldry, J. et al. (1995). The functional independence measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17, 10-14.
53. Kinsella, G., Murtagh, D., Landry, A. et al. (1996). Everyday memory following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 10, 499-507.
54. Kreutzer, J. S., Marwitz, J. H., Seel, R., & Serio, C. D. (1996). Validation of a neurobehavioral functioning inventory for adults with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 116-124.
55. Kurtzke, J. F. (1983). Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology, 33, 1444-1452.
56. Levin, H. S., High, W. M., Goethe, K. E. et al. (1987). The Neurobehavioral Rating Scale: assessment of the behavioral sequelae of head injury by the clinician. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 50, 183-193.
57. Lincoln, N. B., & Bowen, A. (2006). The need for randomised treatment studies in neglect research. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 24, 401-408.
58. Lincoln, N. B., & Leadbitter, D. (1979). Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy, 65, 48-51.
59. Lincoln, N. B., Jackson, J. M., & Adams, S. A. (1998). Reliability and revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy, 84, 358-365.
60. Lincoln, N. B., Sutcliffe, L. M., & Unsworth, G. (2000). Validation of the Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire (SADQ) for use with patients in hospital. Clinical Neuropsychological Assessment, 1, 88-96.
61. Linscott, R. J., Knight, R. G., & Godefrey, H. P. D. (1996). The Profile of Functional Impairment in Communication (PFIC): a measure of communication impairment for clinical use. Brain Injury, 10, 397-412.
62. Maddicks, R., Marzillier, S. L., & Parker, G. (2003). Rehabilitation of unilateral neglect in the acute recovery stage: the efficacy of limb activation therapy. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 391-408.
63. Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
64. McColl, M. A., Davies, D., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., & Minnes, P. (2001). The community integration measure: development and preliminary validation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 429-434.
65. McKinney, M., Blake, H., Treece, K. A. et al. (2002). Evaluation of cognitive assessment in stroke rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 129-136.
66. McPherson, K. M., Pentland, B., Cudmore, S. F., & Prescott, R. J. (1996). An inter-rater reliability study of the Functional Assessment Measure (FIM + FAM). Disability and Rehabilitation, 18, 341-347.
67. Mermis, B. J. (2005). Developing a taxonomy for rehabilitation outcome measurement. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 15-23.
68. Michalon, M., Eskes, G. A., & Mate-Kole, C. C. (1997). Effects of light therapy on neuropsychological function and mood in seasonal affective disorder. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 22, 19-28.
69. Nickels, L. (2005). Tried, tested and trusted? Language assessment for rehabilitation. In P. W. Halligan & D. Wade (Eds.), Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits (pp. 169-184). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
70. Nilsson, A°. L., Sunnerhagen, K. S., & Grimby, G. (2005). Scoring alternatives for FIM in neurological disorders applying Rasch analysis. Acta Neurologicalica Scandinavica, 111, 264-273.
71. Norris, G., & Tate, R. L. (2000). The Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS): ecological, concurrent and construct validity. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 33-45.
72. Nouri, F. M., & Lincoln, N. B. (1987). An extended ADL scale for use with stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 301-305.
73. Piazzini, A., Canevini, M. P., Maggiori, G., & Canger, R. (2001). The perception of memory failures in patients with epilepsy. European Journal of Neurology, 8, 613-620.
74. Pollak, N., Rheault, W., & Stoecker, J. L. (1996). Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 1056-1061.
75. Ponsford, J., & Kinsella, G. (1991). The use of a rating scale of attentional behavior. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1, 241-257.
76. Powell, J. H., Beckers, K., & Greenwood, R. (1998). Measuring progress and outcome in community rehabilitation after brain injury with a new assessment instrument - The BICRO-39 scales. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 1213-1225.
77. Powell, J., Heslin, J., & Greenwood, R. (2002). Community based rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 72, 193-202.
78. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
79. Robertson, I. H., Hogg, K., & McMillan, T. M. (1998). Rehabilitation of unilateral neglect: improving function by contralesional limb activation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 8, 19-29.
80. Robertson, I. H., Ward, T., Ridgeway, V., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1994). The Test of Everyday Attention. Titchfield: Thames Valley Test Company.
81. Ruisel, I. (1991). Memory rating. Studia Psychologica, 33, 71-77.
82. Sarno, M. T. (1969). The Functional Communication Profile Manual of Directions. New York, NY: Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University Medical Center.
83. Sharrack, B., & Hughes, R. A. C. (1999). The Guy’s Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS): a new disability measure for multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 5, 223-233.
84. Skinner, C., Wirz, S., Thompson, I., & Davidson, J. (1984). The Edinburgh Functional Communication Profile. Oxford: Winslow Press.
85. Sohlberg, M. M., McLaughlin, K. A., Pavese, A., Heidrich, A., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Evaluation of attention process training and brain injury education in persons with acquired brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 656-676.
86. Stern, R. A. (1997). Visual Analog Mood Scales. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
87. Stewart, A. L., & Ware, J. E. (1992). Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
88. Sunderland, A., Harris, J. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1983). Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 341-357.
89. Sunderland, A., Harris, J. E., & Gleave, J. (1984). Memory failures in everyday life following severe head injury. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 127-142.
90. Sutcliffe, L., & Lincoln, N. (1998). The assessment of depression in aphasic stroke patients: the development of the Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12, 506-513.
91. Taylor, R. (1990). Relationships between cognitive test performance and everyday cognitive difficulties in multiple sclerosis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 251-253.
92. Tham, K., & Tegnér, R. (1996). The Baking Tray Task: a test of spatial neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 6, 19-25.
93. Tinson, D. J., & Lincoln, N. B. (1987). Subjective memory impairment after stroke. International Disability Studies, 9, 6-9.
94. Towle, D., & Lincoln, N. B. (1991). Development of a questionnaire for detecting everyday problems in stroke patients with unilateral visual neglect. Clinical Rehabilitation, 5, 135-140.
95. Turner-Stokes, L., & Hassan, N. (2002). Depression after stroke: a review of the evidence base to inform the development of an integrated care pathway. Part 1: Diagnosis, frequency and impact. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 231-247.
96. van der Putten, J. J. M. F., Hobart, J. C., Freeman, J. A., & Thompson, A. J. (1999). Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 66, 480-484.
97. van Zomeren, A. H., & Spikman, J. M. (2003). Assessment of attention. In P. W. Halligan, U. Kischka, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology (pp. 73-88). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
98. Vaney, C., Blaurock, H., Gattlen, B., & Meisels, C. (1996). Assessing mobility in multiple sclerosis using the Rivermead Mobility Index and gait speed. Clinical Rehabilitation, 10, 216-226.
99. von Cramon, D. Y., Matthes-von Cramon, G., & Mai, N. (1991). Problem solving deficits in brain-injured patients: a therapeutic approach. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1, 45-64.
100. Wade, D. T. (2003). Outcome measures for clinical rehabilitation trials: impairment, function, quality of life, or value? American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, S26-S31.
101. Wade, D. T., Collen, F. M., Robb, G. F., & Warlow, C. P. (1992). Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. British Medical Journal, 304, 609-613.
102. Wade, D. T., Crawford, S., Wenden, F. J., King, N. S., & Moss, N. E. G. (1997). Does routine follow up after head injury help? A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 62, 478-484.
103. Walker, R., Findlay, J. M., Young, A. W., & Welch, J. (1991). Disentangling neglect and hemianopia. Neuropsychologia, 29, 1019-1027.
104. Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36Health SurveyManual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
105. Watkins, C. L., Auton, M. F., Deans, C. F. et al. (2007). Motivational interviewing early after acute stroke: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke, 38, 1004-1009.
106. Weniger, D. (1990). Diagnostic tests as tools of assessment and models of information processing: a gap to bridge. Aphasiology, 4, 109-113.
107. Whiteneck, G., Charlifues, W., Gerhart, K., Overholser, J. D., & Richardson, G. N. (1992). Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long term rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 519-526.
108. Whyte, J., Hart, T., Bode, R. K., & Malec, J. F. (2003). The Moss Attention Rating Scale for traumatic brain injury: Initial psychometric assessment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 268-276.
109. Wilson, B. A., Cockburn, J., & Baddeley, A. (1985). The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
110. Wilson, B. A., Cockburn, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1987). Behavioural Inattention Test. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
111. Wilson, B. A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P., Emslie, H., & Evans, J. (1996). Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
112. Wilson, B. A., Clare, L., Baddeley, A., Watson, P., & Tate, R. (1998). Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Extended Version (RBMT-E). Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
113. Winward, C. E., Halligan, P. W., & Wade, D. T. (2002). The Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP): standardization and reliability data. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 523-533.
114. World Health Organization (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
115. Worthington, A. (2005). Rehabilitation of executive deficits: Effective treatments of related disabilities. In P. W. Halligan & D. Wade (Eds.), Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits (pp. 257-267) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
116. Zelinski, E. M., Gilewski, M. J., & Anthony-Bergstone, C. R. (1990). Memory Functioning Questionnaire: concurrent validity with memory performance and selfreported memory failures. Psychology and Aging, 5, 388-399.
117. Zigmund, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 67, 361-370.
118. Zoccolotti, P., & Judica, A. (1992). Functional evaluation of hemineglect by means of a semi-structured scale: personal extrapersonal differentiation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2, 33-44.
119. Zoccolotti, P., Antonucci, G., & Judica, A. (1992). Psychometric characteristics of two semi-structured scales for the functional evaluation of hemi-inattention in extrapersonal and personal space. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2, 179-191.