Stipends in Volunteer Civic Service: Inclusion, Retention, and Volunteer Benefits

Public Administration Review

Volumn 71, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 850-858

  Mcbride, Amanda Moore ^a   Gonzales, Ernest ^a   Morrow Howell, Nancy ^a   Mccrary, Stacey ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81255169829     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02419.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ballinger, Gary A. 2004. Using Generalized Estimating Equations for Longitudinal Data Analysis. Organizational Research Methods 7(2): 127-50.
2. Bandow, Doug. 1990. National Service Initiatives. In National Service: Pro and Con, edited by Williamson M. Evers, 1-26. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
3. Berry, William D. 1993. Understanding Regression Assumptions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
4. Brown, Evelyn. 2000. The Scope of Volunteer Activity and Public Service. Law and Contemporary Problems 62(4): 17-42.
5. Carlson, Michelle C., Jane S. Saczynski, George W. Rebok, Teresa Seeman, Thomas A. Glass, Sylvia McGill, James Tielsch, et al. 2008. Exploring the Effect of an "Everyday" Activity Program on Executive Function and Memory in Older Adults: Experience Corps. The Gerontologist 48(6): 793-801.
6. Chacón, Fernando, María Lucia Vecina, and María Celeste Dávila 2007. The Three-Stage Model of Volunteers' Duration of Service. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 35(5): 627-42.
7. Cnaan, Ram A., Femida Handy, and Margaret Wadsworth 1996. Defining Who Is a Volunteer: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 25(3): 364-83.
8. Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS). 2007 The Health Benefits of Volunteering: A Review of Recent Research. Washington, DC: CNCS.
9. Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS). 2008 New Federal Report Shows Volunteering Strong in America, but 1 in 3 Volunteers Dropped Out in 2006. News release, April 16. [accessed May 26, 2011].
10. Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS). 2009 Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act of 2009. [accessed May 26, 2011].
11. Evers, Williamson M., ed. 1990. National Service: Pro and Con. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
12. Experience Corps. 2009 [accessed May 26, 2011].
13. Farmer, Steven M., and Donald B. Fedor 2000. Volunteer Participation and Withdrawal: A Psychological Contract Perspective on the Role of Expectations and Organizational Support. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 9(4): 349-67.
14. Foster-Bey, John, Robert Grimm, Jr., and Nathan Dietz 2007. Keeping Baby Boomers Volunteering. Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service. [accessed June 1, 2011].
15. Fried, Linda P., Michelle C. Carlson, Marc Freedman, Kevin D. Frick, Thomas A. Glass, Joel Hill, Sylvia McGill, et al. 2004. A Social Model for Health Promotion for an Aging Population: Initial Evidence on the Experience Corps Model. Journal of Urban Health 81(1): 64-78.
16. Hager, Mark A., and Jeffery L. Brudney 2004. Balancing Act: The Challenges and Benefits of Volunteers. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
17. Hong, Song-Iee., Nancy Morrow-Howell, Fengyan Tang, and James Hinterlong 2009. Engaging Older Adults in Volunteering: Conceptualizing and Measuring Institutional Capacity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 38(2): 200-219.
18. McBride, Amanda Moore. 2007. Civic Engagement, Older Adults, and Inclusion. Generations 30(4): 66-71.
19. McBride, Amanda Moore, and YungSoo Lee 2009. Predictors of Retention in AmeriCorps National Volunteer Service. Working paper, Center for Social Development, Washington University in St. Louis.
20. McBride, Amanda Moore, and Michael Sherraden 2007. Directions in Civic Service Scholarship: An Institutional Perspective. In Civic Service Worldwide: Impacts and Inquiry, edited by Amanda Moore McBride and Michael Sherraden, 223-37. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
21. McBride, Amanda Moore., Michael Sherraden, Carlos Benítez, and Elizabeth Johnson 2004. Civic Service Worldwide: Defining a Field, Building a Knowledge Base. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33(4): S8-21.
22. Mesch, Debra J.., Mary Tschirhart, James L. Perry, and Geunjoo Lee 1998. Altruists or Egoists?, Retention in Stipended Service. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 9(1): 3-21.
23. Miller, Lynn E., Gary N. Powell, and Joseph Seltzer 1990. Determinants of Turnover among Volunteers. Human Relations 43(9): 901-17.
24. Morrow-Howell, Nancy., James Hinterlong, Philip A. Rozario, and Fengyan Tang 2003. Effects of Volunteering on the Well-Being of Older Adults. Journal of Gerontology 58(3): S137-45.
25. Morrow-Howell, Nancy., James Hinterlong, Michael Sherraden, and Philip A. Rozario 2001. Advancing Research on Productivity in Later Life. In Productive Aging: Concepts and Challenges, edited by Nancy Morrow-Howell, James Hinterlong, and Michael Sherraden, 285-312. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Morrow-Howell, Nancy., James Hinterlong, Michael Sherraden, Fengyan Tang, Prema Thirupathy, and Madhura Nagchoudhuri 2003. Instructional Capacity for Elder Service. Social Development Issues 25(1-2): 189-204.
27. Morrow-Howell, Nancy, Song-Iee Hong, and Fengyan Tang 2009. Who Benefits from Volunteering?, Variations in Perceived Benefits. The Gerontologist 49(1): 91-102.
28. Morrow-Howell, Nancy., Stacey McCrary, Song-Iee Hong, Wayne Blinne, E. Dessem, and Cal Halvorsen 2008. Experience Corps: Methodology of Member Outcomes Study. Research Brief no. 08-29), Center for Social Development, Washington University in St. Louis.
29. Musick, Mark A., and John Wilson 2008. Volunteers. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
30. Perry, James L., and Mark T. Imperial 2001. A Decade of Service-Related Research: A Map of the Field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30(3): 462-79.
31. Perry, James L., and Ann Marie Thomson 2004. Civic Service: What Difference Does It Make?, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
32. Perry, James L., and Ann Marie Thomson 2007 The Effects of National Service in the United States: A Research Synthesis. In Civic Service Worldwide: Impacts and Inquiry, edited by Amanda Moore McBride and Michael Sherraden, 74-94. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
33. Peters, T. J.., S. H. Richards, C. R. Bankhead, A. E. Ades, and J. A. Sterne 2003. Comparison of Methods for Analysing Cluster Randomized Trials: An Example Involving a Factorial Design. International Journal of Epidemiology 32(5): 840-46.
34. Rebok, George W., Michelle C. Carlson, Thomas A. Glass, Sylvia McGill, Joel Hill, Barbara A. Wasik, Nicholas Ialongo, et al. 2004. Short-Term Impact of Experience Corps Participation on Children and Schools: Results from a Pilot Randomized Trial. Journal of Urban Health 81(1): 79-93.
35. Rozario, Philip A. 2007. Volunteering Among Current Cohorts of Older Adults and Baby Boomers. Generations 30(4): 31-36.
36. Sherraden, Michael. 2001. Civic Service: Issues, Outlook, Institution Building. St. Louis, MO: Center for Social Development, Washington University in St. Louis.
37. Smith, Justin Davis. 2004. Civic Service in Western Europe. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33(4): S64-78.
38. Spring, Kimberly, Nathan Dietz, and Robert Grimm 2007. Youth Helping America: Leveling the Path to Participation: Volunteering and Civic Engagement Among Youth from Disadvantaged Circumstances. Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service.
39. Tang, Fengyan. 2007. Socioeconomic Disparities in Voluntary Organization Involvement among Older Adults. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 37(1): 57-75.
40. Tang, Fengyan, Nancy Morrow-Howell, and Song-Iee Hong 2009. Institutional Facilitation in Sustained Volunteering among Older Volunteers. Social Work Research 33(3): 172-82.
41. Tschirhart, Mary. 1998. Understanding the Older Stipended Volunteer: Age-Related Differences among AmeriCorps Members. Public Productivity and Management Review 22(1): 35-48.
42. Tschirhart, Mary., Debra J. Mesch, James L. Perry, Theodore K. Miller, and Geunjoo Lee 2001. Stipended Volunteers: Their Goals, Experiences, Satisfaction, and Likelihood of Future Service. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30(3): 422-43.
43. Wofford, Harris, Steven Waldman, and Doug Bandow 1996. AmeriCorps the Beautiful?, National Service-or Government Service?, Policy Review, no. 79: 33-36.