Place Rank: Valuing Spatial Interactions

Networks and Spatial Economics

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 643-659

  El Geneidy, Ahmed ^a   Levinson, David ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Cumulative opportunity; Gravity based; Land use; Mobility; PageRank; Place rank

Indexed keywords

EID: 81255168695     PISSN: 1566113X     EISSN: 15729427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11067-011-9153-z     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agence métropolitaine de transport (2003) Enquête origine-destination. Technical report.
2. Axhausen K (2008) Accessibility: long term perspectives. J transp. land use 1(2): 5-22.
3. Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput Networks 30(1-7): 107-117.
4. Coffey W, Shearmur R (2001) The identification of employment centres in Canadian metropolitan areas: the example of Montreal, 1996. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, vol 45. Wiley Online Library, pp 371-386.
5. Communauté métropolitaine de Montréal (2008) Les municipalités en chiffres. http://www. cmm. qc. ca/index. php?id=267. Accessed October 2010.
6. El-Geneidy A, Levinson D (2006) Access to destinations: development of accessibility measures. Technical report.
7. Filipi M (2005) Travel time for the twin cities region. Electrnic database of the Twin Cities travel demand model.
8. Geurs K, van Eck J (2003) Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use scenarios: the implications of job competition, land-use, and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands. Environ Plann B Plann Des 30(1): 69-87.
9. Geurs K, van Wee B (2004) Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. J Transp Geogr 12(2): 127-140.
10. Handy S (2002) Accessibility- vs. mobility-enhancing strategies for addressing automobile dependence in the US. paper presented at the European Conference of Ministers of Transport May 2002.
11. Handy S, Niemeier DA (1997) Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environ Plann A 29(7): 1175-1194.
12. Hansen W (1959) How accessibility shape land use. J Am Inst Plann 25(2): 73-76.
13. Iacono M, Krizek K, El-Geneidy A (2010) Measuring non-motorized accessibility: issues, alternatives, and execution. J Transp Geogr 18(1): 133-140.
14. Jiang B (2009) Ranking spaces for predicting human movement in an urban environment. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 23: 823-837.
15. LEHD (2003) Longitudinal employer household dynamics. Technical report, US Census Bureau, LEHD Program, Suitland, MD.
16. Levinson D (1998) Accessibility and the journey to work. J Transp Geogr 6(1): 11-21.
17. Matthews K, Buchan K, Sibbald A, Craw, S (2006) Combining deliberative and computer-based methods for multi-objective land-use planning. Agric Syst 87(1): 18-37.
18. Ottensmann J, Lindsey G (2008) A use-based measure of accessibility to linear features to predict urban trail use. J transp. land use 1(1): 41-63.
19. Pirie G (1979) Measuring accessibility: a review and proposal. Environ Plann A 11(3): 299-312.
20. Schoenfelder S, Axhausen K (2010) Urban rhythms and travel behaviour: spatial and temporal phenomena of daily travel. Ashgate Publishing Company.
21. Schrank D, Lomax T (2005) The 2005 urban mobility report. Technical report, Texas Transportation Institute.
22. Scott D, Horner M (2008) The role of urban form in shaping access to opportunities. J transp. land use 1(2): 89-119.
23. Shen Q (1998) Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers. Environ Plann B Plann Des 25(3): 345-365.
24. Statistics Canada (2009) Population of census metropolitan areas (2006 Census boundaries). http://www40. statcan. ca/l01/cst01/demo05a-eng. htm. Accessed October 2010.
25. Van Wee B, Hagoort M, Annema J (2001) Accessibility measures with competition. J Transp Geogr 9(3): 199-208.
26. Vickerman RW (1974) Accessibility, attraction and potential: a review of some concepts and their use in determining mobility. Environ Plann A 6: 675-691.
27. Wachs M, Kumagai T (1973) Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socioecon Plan Sc 7: 327-456.
28. Wilson A (1971) A family of spatial interaction models, and associated developments. Environ Plan 3(1): 1-32.
29. Zhu S, Levinson D (2010) People don't take the shortest path. Working Papers, Nexus Research Group, University of Minnesota.