Recommendations of the IOM Clinical Preventive Services for Women Committee: Implications for obstetricians and gynecologists

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 471-480

  Gee, Rebekah E ^a   Brindis, Claire D ^b,c   Diaz, Angela ^d,e   Garcia, Francisco ^f   Gregory, Kimberly ^g,h   Peck, Magda G ⁱ   Reece, E Albert ^j  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Department of Preventive Medicine ^*  (United States)

^e MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^g CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

healthcare reform; prevention; women's health practice

Indexed keywords

BREAST FEEDING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTRACEPTION; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; FEMALE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREGNANT WOMAN; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; UNITED STATES; WART VIRUS; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (U.S.); INSURANCE COVERAGE; INSURANCE, HEALTH; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; PREGNANCY; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 81255157851     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: 1473656X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834cdcc6     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. IOM (Institute of Medicine).2011. Clinical preventive services for women: closing the gaps. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
2. Federal Register. 2010a. Interim final rules for group health plans and health insurance issuers relating to coverage of preventive services under the patient protection and affordable care act. Federal Register 75:41726-41730.
3. IOM (Institute of Medicine).Leading Health Indicators for Healthy People 2020 Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. Reading the Healthy People 2020 will give the OB/GYN a good sense of national goals for health and wellness.
4. IOM (Institute of Medicine).Women's health research: progress, pitfalls, and promise Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.
5. Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, et al. The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS Med 2009; 6:e1000058.
6. NIDDK. National Diabetes Statistics, 2011, Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2011. http://diabetes.niddk. nih.gov/dm/pubs/statistics/. [Accessed 1 June 2011]
7. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl JMed 2005; 188 (5 Suppl): S71-S76.
8. Langer O, Yogev Y, Most O, Xenakis EMJ. Gestational diabetes: the consequences of not treating. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 33:76-83.
9. Metzger BE, Buchanan Ta, Coustan Dr, et al. Summary and recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2007; 30:S251-S260.
10. Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry KU, et al. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer 2006; 37:1270-1281.
11. Kjaer S, Hogdall E, Frederiksen K, et al. The absolute risk of cervical abnormalities in high-risk human papillomavirus-positive, cytologically normal women over a 10-year period. Cancer Res 2006; 66:10630-10636.
12. Petry KU, Menton S, Menton M, et al. Inclusion of HPV testing in routine cervical cancer screening for women above 29 years in Germany: results for 8466 patients. Br J Cancer 2003; 88:1570-1577.
13. Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:1579-1588.
14. Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Coutlee F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of human papillomavirus testing versus Pap cytology in the primary screening for cervical cancer precursors: design, methods and preliminary accrual results of the Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Trial (CCCAST).Int J Cancer 119:615-623.
15. Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, et al. 2011. Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70145-0.
16. MayrandMH, Duarte-Franco E, Coutlee F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of human papillomavirus testing versus Pap cytology in the primary screening for cervical cancer precursors: design, methods and preliminary accrual results of the Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Trial (CCCAST).Int J Cancer 2006; 119:615-623.
17. Petry KU, Menton S, Menton M, et al. Inclusion of HPV testing in routine cervical cancer screening for women above 29 years in Germany: results for 8466 patients. Br J Cancer 2003; 88:1570-1577.
18. Friedel D, Lavoie S. Epidemiology and trends in sexually transmitted diseases. In Wallace R, Kohatsu N, Last J, editors. Public health and preventive medicine. 15th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Medical; 2008. pp. 155-188.
19. Hodder SL, Justman J, Haley D'E, et al. Challenges of a hidden epidemic: HIV prevention among women in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 55:S69-S73.
20. Ranji U, Salganicoff A. Women's healthcare chartbook. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2011.
21. DeCarlo P, Reznick OG. What are Black women's HIV prevention needs? San Francisco, CA: University of California San Francisco Center for AIDS Prevention Studies; 2009. ttp://caps.ucsf.edu/uploads/pubs/FS/pdf/BlackwomenFS. pdf. [Accessed 9 June 2011]
22. Gandhi NR, Skanderson M, Gordon KS, et al. Delayed presentation for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care among veterans: a problem of access or screening? Med Care 2007; 45:1105-1109.
23. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sexual Reproduct Health 2006; 38:90-96.
24. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2006; 295:1809-1823.
25. Zhu BP. Effect of interpregnancy interval on birth outcomes: findings from three recent us studies. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2005; 89:S25-S33.
26. FDA. Birth control guide. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 2010. http://www.fda.gov/forconsumers/byaudience/forwomen/ucm118465.htm. [Accessed 31 May 2011]
27. DiGirolamo A, Thompson N, Martorell R, et al. Intention or experience? Predictors of continued breastfeeding. Health Educ Behav 2005; 14: 215-233.
28. California WIC Association and U.C. Davis Human Lactation Center. Depends on where you are born: California hospitals must close the gap in exclusive breastfeeding rates. Davis, CA: California WIC Association; 2008.
29. CDC. Provisional geographic-specific breastfeeding rates among children born in 2007. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007. http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/NIS-data/2007/state-any.htm. [Accessed 16 March 2011]
30. DiGirolamo AM, Grummer-Strawn LM, Fein SB. Do perceived attitudes of physicians and hospital staff affect breastfeeding decisions? Birth 2003; 30:94-100.
31. Battaglia TA, Finley E, Liebschutz JM. Survivors of intimate partner violence speak out: trust in the patient-provider relationship. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18:617-623.
32. Coker A L, Smith P H, Bethea L, et al. Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9:451-457.
33. Martin SL, Rentz ED, Chan RL, et al. Physical and sexual violence among North Carolina women: associations with physical health, mental health, and functional impairment. Women's Health Issues 2008; 18:130-140.
34. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Costs of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in the United States. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003.
35. Svarsdottir EK, Orlygsdottir B. Intimate partner abuse factors associated with women's health: a general population study. J Adv Nursing 2009; 65:1452-1462.
36. Felitti VJ. Long-term medical consequences of incest, rape, and molestation. South Med J 1991; 84:328-331.
37. Fillingim RB, Wilkinson CS, Powell T. Self-reported abuse history and pain complaints among young adults. Clin J Pain 1999; 15:85-91.
38. Valente SM. Sexual abuse of boys. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs 2005; 18:10-16.
39. Weisman CS. Women's healthcare: activist traditions and institutional change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.
40. Bernstein J, Chollet D, Peterson GG. Issue brief: encouraging appropriate use of preventive health services. Mathematica Policy Res May 2010.
41. Blustein J. Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:1138-1143.
42. Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, et al. Gender differences in the utilization of healthcare services. J Family Pract 2000; 49:147-152.
43. Kjerulff KH, Frick KD, Rhoades JA, Hollenbeak CS. The cost of being a woman: a national study of healthcare utilization and expenditures for femalespecific conditions. Womens Health Issues 2007; 17:13-21.
44. KFF (Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation).Impact of health reform on women's access to coverage and care. Washington, DC: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2010. http://www.kff.org/womenshealth/upload/7987.pdf. [Accessed 13 April 2011]
45. Asch SM, Kerr EA, Keesey J, et al. Who is at greatest risk for receiving poorquality healthcare? N Engl J Med 2006; 354:1147-1156.
46. Collins S, Rustgi S, Doty M. Realizing health reform's potential: women and the Affordable Care Act of 2010, The Commonwealth Fund, July 2010.
47. Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Flottemesch TJ, et al. Greater use of preventive services in U.S. healthcare could save lives at little or no cost. Health Affairs 2010; 29:1656-1660.
48. Johnson K, Posner SF, Biermann J, et al. Recommendations to improve preconception health and healthcare: United States. A report of the CDC/ ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006; 55:1-23.
49. Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, et al. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203:115.e1-115.e7.