Investigating Market Structure of the Greek Manufacturing Industry: A Hall-Roeger Approach

Atlantic Economic Journal

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 383-400

  Rezitis, Anthony N ^a   Kalantzi, Maria A ^a  

^a University of Western Greece   (Greece)

Author keywords

Bootstrap; Hall Roeger; Manufacturing industry; Markup; Panel data

Indexed keywords

EID: 81255157801     PISSN: 01974254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11293-011-9286-y     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abayasiri-Silva, K. (1999). Market power in Australian manufacturing industry: A confirmation of Hall's hypothesis. Centre of policy studies. Monash. University, Working Paper G-132.
2. Badinger, H. (2004). Do we really know that the EU's Single Market Programme has fostered competition? Europainstitut. Working papers No. 55.
3. Bhuyan, S., & Lopez, R. (1998). What determines welfare losses from the oligopoly power in the food and tobacco industries? Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 27, 258-265.
4. Borg, M. (2009). Measuring market competition in the EU: The mark-up approach. Bank of Valletta Review, 39.
5. Bourlakis, C. A. (1992b). Profits and market power in Greek Manufacturing Industries. Ph. D. Thesis, School of Economic and Social Studies. University of East Anglia.
6. Bourlakis, C. A. (1997). Profitability of survival and firm growth in Greek manufacturing industry, 1966-1986. Greece: Centre of Planning and Economic Research.
7. Boyle, G. E. (2004). Hall-Roeger tests of market power in Irish manufacturing industries. The Economic and Social Review, 35, 289-304.
8. Cabral, L. (2002). Introduction to Industrial Organization (2nd printing). USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
9. Ceritoglu, E. (2002). The cyclicality of mark-up ratios: The case of Turkish industry. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. Research Department, Working Papers No. 4.
10. Connor, J., & Peterson, E. (1992). Market-structure determinants of national brand-private label price differences of manufactured food products. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 40, 157-171.
11. Crespi, J. M., & Gao, Z. (2005). A simple test of oligopsony behavior with an application to rice milling. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 3(article 6).
12. Dobrinsky, R., Korosi, G., Markov, N., & Halpern, L. (2004). Firms' price markups and returns to scale in imperfect markets - Bulgaria and Hungary. Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Discussion Papers No. 2004/12.
13. Gorg, H., & Warzynski F. (2003). Price cost margins and exporting behaviour: Evidence from firm level data. LICOS Discussion Papers 13303, Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance. K. U. Leuven.
14. Hall, R. E. (1988). The relation between price and marginal cost in U. S. industry. Journal of Polical Economy, 96, 921-947.
15. Hindriks, F. A. (1999). Non-Competitive Rents in Dutch Manufacturing: Conduct and Performance in the New Empirical Industrial Organization. EIM Research Report 9905/E.
16. Martins, J., Scarpetta S., & Pilat D. (1996). Mark-Up Ratio in Manufacturing Industries: Estimation for 14 OECD Countries. OECD Working paper 162.
17. Oustapassidis, K., Vlachvei, A., & Notta, O. (2000). Efficiency and market power in Greek food industries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82, 623-629.
18. Roeger, W. (1995). Can imperfect competition explain the difference between primal and dual productivity measures? Estimates for U. S. manufacturing. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 316-331.
19. Ryan, D. (1997). Trends in market power and productivity growth rates in US and Japanese manufacturing. Economics Letters, 57, 183-187.
20. Wilhelmsson, F. (2006). Market power and European competition in the Swedish food industry. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 4(article 7).