Effects of skewness and kurtosis on normal-theory based maximum likelihood test statistic in multilevel structural equation modeling

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1066-1074

  Ryu, Ehri ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Maximum likelihood test statistic; Multilevel structural equation modeling; Violation of multivariate normality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY;

EID: 81255138263     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0115-7     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
2. Bentler, P. M., & Liang, J. (2003). Two-level mean and covariance structures: Maximum likelihood via EM algorithm. In S. P. Reise & N. Duan (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues and applications (pp. 53-70). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
3. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
4. Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 605-634.
5. Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation models: present and future. (pp. 139-168). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
6. Bradley, D. R., & Fleisher, C. L. (1994). Generating multivariate data from nonnormal distributions: Mihal and Barrett revisited. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 156-166.
7. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16-29.
8. D'Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A., & D'Agostino, R. B., Jr. (1990). A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. The American Statistician, 44, 316-321.
9. DeCarlo, L. T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2, 292-307.
10. Goldstein, H., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). A general model for the analysis of multilevel data. Psychometrika, 53, 455-467.
11. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
12. Jöreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 43, 446-473.
13. Lee, S.-Y. (1990). Multilevel analysis of structural equation models. Biometrika, 77, 763-772.
14. Liang, J., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). An EM algorithm for fitting two-level structural equation models. Psychometrika, 69, 101-122.
15. Longford, N. T., & Muthén, B. O. (1992). Factor analysis for clustered observations. Psychometrika, 57, 581-597.
16. MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
17. Muthén, B. O. (1990). Mean and covariance structure analysis of hierarchical data. UCLA Statistics Series, No. 62. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
18. Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 376-398.
19. Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267-316.
20. Ramberg, J. S., Dudewicz, E. J., Tadikamalla, P. R., & Mykytka, E. F. (1979). A probability distribution and its uses in fitting data. Technometrics, 21, 201-214.
21. Reinartz, W. J., Echambadi, R., & Chin, W. W. (2002). Generating non-normal data for simulation of structural equation models using Mattson's method. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 227-244.
22. Ryu, E., & West, S. G. (2009). Level-specific evaluation of model fit in multilevel structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 583-601.
23. Tukey, J. W. (1986). Sunset salvo. The American Statistician, 40, 72-76.
24. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
25. Wilk, M. B., & Gnanadesikan, R. (1968). Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. Biometrika, 55, 1-17.
26. Wright, D. B., & Herrington, J. A. (2011). Problematic standard errors and confidence intervals for skewness and kurtosis. Behavioral Research Methods, 43, 8-17.
27. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2002). On normal theory based inference for multilevel models with distributional violations. Psychometrika, 67, 539-562.
28. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2003). Eight test statistics for multilevel structural equation models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 44, 89-107.
29. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2006). Asymptotic robustness of standard errors in multilevel structural equation models. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 97, 1121-1141.
30. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2007). Multilevel covariance structure analysis by fitting multiple single-level models. Sociological Methodology, 37, 53-82.
31. Yuan, K.-H., Bentler, P. M., & Zhang, W. (2005). The effect of skewness and kurtosis on mean and covariance structure analysis: The univariate case and its multivariate implication. Sociological Methods & Research, 34, 240-258.