Patent retrieval - A question of access

World Patent Information

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 345-351

  Bache, Richard ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Corpus access; Evaluation; Hybrid systems; Information retrieval; Non Boolean; Patent; Recall oriented domain; Retrievability

Indexed keywords

EID: 81255137097     PISSN: 01722190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wpi.2011.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bache R., Azzopardi L. Improving access to large patent corpora. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2010, 6380:103-121. LNCS. A. Hameurlain (Ed.).
2. Mizzaro S. Relevance: the whole (hi)story. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1996, 48:810-832.
3. Mizzaro S. How many relevances in information retrieval?. Interacting with Computers 1998, 10:305-322.
4. Crestani F., Lalmas M., Rijsbergen C.J.V., Campbell I. "Is this document relevant? probably": a survey of probabilistic models in information retrieval 2001.
5. van Rijsbergen C.J. Information retrieval 1979, Butterworths, London,.
6. Voorhees E. The philosophy of information retrieval evaluation. CLEF 2001 2002, 355-370. Springer-Verlag. C.A. Peters (Ed.).
7. T. R. C. T. Data, web, Last visited 2010. http://trec.nist.gov/data.html.
8. Zobel J. How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments?. Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on research and development in information retrieval 1998, 307-314. ACM Press.
9. I. R. Facility, Trec-chem'09, Last visited 2010. http://www.irfacility.org/research/evaluation/tec-chem-09.
10. I. R. Facility, Trec-chem'10, Last visited 2010. http://www.irfacility.org/research/evaluation/tec-chem-10.
11. Spark Jones K. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation 2004, 60:779-840.
12. Spark Jones K., Walker S., Robertson S.E. A probabilistic model of information retrieval: development and comparative experiments. Information Processing and Management 2000, 36:493-502. (parts 1 and 2).
13. Fang H., Tao T., Zhai C. A formal study of information retrieval heuristics. SIGIR '04: Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval 2004, 49-56. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
14. Salton G., Fox E., Wu H. Extended boolean information retrieval, Communications of ACM 1983, 1022-1036.
15. Arampatzis A., Kamps J., Koolen M., Nussbaum N. Access to legal documents: exact match, best match and combinations. TREC 2007: NIST Special Publication 500-274 2007, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, The Sixteenth Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings.
16. Bache R, Azzopardi L. Identifying retrievability-improving model features to enhance boolean search for patent retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Advances in Patent Information Retrieval.
17. Azzopardi L., Vinay V. Accessibility in information retrieval. Advances in information retrieval ECIR 2008 2008, 482-489. Springer Verlag, Glasgow, UK.
18. Azzopardi L, Vinay V. Document accessibility: Evaluating the access a_orded to a document by the retrieval system. In: Evaluation Workshop at the European Conference in Information Retrieval, Glasgow, UK.
19. Azzopardi L., Vinay V. Evaluation methods for information access tasks. CIKM 2008 Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management 2008, ACM PRESS, California, US.
20. Gastwirth J. The estimation of the Lorenz curve and Gini index. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1972, 54:306-316.
21. Azzopardi L, Bache R. On the Relationship Between Effectiveness and Accessibility. In: 33rd Annual ACM SIGIR Conference, Geneva, July 2010.