Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion through a unilateral approach and percutaneous osteosynthesis

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 595-601

  Blondel, B ^a   Adetchessi, T ^a   Pech Gourg, G ^a   Metellus P ^a   Dufour, H ^a   Fuentes, S ^a  

^a TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Lumbar spine; Minimally invasive; Spondylolisthesis; TLIF

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRODESIS; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORBIDITY; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS OSTEOSYNTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REOPERATION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOM; TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; VERTEBRAL CANAL;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 81155161888     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Libson E., Bloom R.A., Dinari G. Symptomatic and asymptomatic spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in young adults. Int Orthop 1982, 6:259-261.
2. Dehoux E., Fourati E., Madi K., Reddy B., Segal P. Posterolateral versus interbody fusion in isthmic spondylolisthesis: functional results in 52 cases with a minimum follow-up of 6 years. Acta Orthop Belg 2004, 70:578-582.
3. Dhall S.S., Wang M.Y., Mummaneni P.V. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2008, 9:560-565.
4. Hackenberg L., Halm H., Bullmann V., et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results. Eur Spine J 2005, 14:551-558.
5. Lerat J.L., Rubini J., Vincent P., Besse J.L., Moyen B. Results of posterior lumbar intersomatic fusion in the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. Apropos of 27 cases followed over more than 10 years. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1996, 82:475-489.
6. Armin S.S., Holly L.T., Khoo L.T. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar stenosis and disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus 2008, 25:E11.
7. Faure P.A., Caire F., Moreau J.J. Less invasive calibration of lumbar canal stenosis. Results with a tubular muscle retraction system used in 35 patients. Neurochirurgie 2007, 53:1-9.
8. Foley K.T., Gupta S.K., Justis J.R., Sherman M.C. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine. Neurosurg Focus 2001, 10:E10.
9. Guiot B.H., Khoo L.T., Fessler R.G. A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine (PhilaPa 1976) 2002, 27:432-438.
10. el-Masry M.A., Khayal H., Salah H. Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using a single cage for treatment of low grade lytic spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthop Belg 2008, 74:667-671.
11. Khoo L.T., Palmer S., Laich D.T., Fessler R.G. Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 2002, 51:S166-S171.
12. Rodriguez-Olaverri J.C., Zimick N.C., Merola A., et al. Comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of pedicular transvertebral screw fixation of the lumbosacral spine in spondylolisthesis versus unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with posterior fixation using anterior cages. Spine (PhilaPa 1976) 2008, 33:1977-1981.
13. Harms J., Rolinger H. A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1982, 120:343-347. [author's translation].
14. Rosenberg W.S., Mummaneni P.V. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 2001, 48:569-574. [discussion 74-5].
15. Isaacs R.E., Podichetty V.K., Santiago P., et al. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 2005, 3:98-105.
16. Schwender J.D., Holly L.T., Rouben D.P., Foley K.T. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005, 18(Suppl.):S1-S6.
17. Jang J.S., Lee S.H. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 2005, 3:218-223.
18. Schizas C., Tzinieris N., Tsiridis E., Kosmopoulos V. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 2009, 33:1683-1688.
19. Perrin G., Goutelle A., Fischer G., Monib H. Lumbosciatica caused by spondylolisthesis. Results of the surgical treatment by facetolaminectomy and interbody arthrodesis by the posterior approach in a series of 66 cases. Neurochirurgie 1984, 30:387-393.
20. Potter B.K., Freedman B.A., Verwiebe E.G., et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005, 18:337-346.
21. Lowery G.L., Kulkarni S.S. Posterior percutaneous spine instrumentation. Eur Spine J 2000, 9(Suppl. 1):S126-S130.
22. Wenger M., Sapio N., Markwalder T.M. Long-term outcome in 132 consecutive patients after posterior internal fixation and fusion for Grade I and II isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2005, 2:289-297.
23. Salehi S.A., Tawk R., Ganju A., et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and results in 24 patients. Neurosurgery 2004, 54:368-374. [discussion 74].
24. Csecsei G.I., Klekner A.P., Dobai J., Lajgut A., Sikula J. Posterior interbody fusion using laminectomy bone and transpedicular screw fixation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Surg Neurol 2000, 53:2-6. [discussion 6-7].
25. Houten J.K., Post N.H., Dryer J.W., Errico T.J. Clinical and radiographically/neuroimaging documented outcome in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 2006, 20:E8.
26. Kim N.H., Lee J.W. Anterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. A comparison of clinical results. Spine (PhilaPa 1976) 1999, 24:812-816. [discussion 17].
27. Madan S., Boeree N.R. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine (PhilaPa 1976) 2002, 27:1536-1542.
28. McAfee P.C., DeVine J.G., Chaput C.D., et al. The indications for interbody fusion cages in the treatment of spondylolisthesis: analysis of 120 cases. Spine (PhilaPa 1976) 2005, 30:S60-S65.
29. Swan J., Hurwitz E., Malek F., et al. Surgical treatment for unstable low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a prospective controlled study of posterior instrumented fusion compared with combined anterior-posterior fusion. Spine J 2006, 6:606-614.
30. Commarmond J. One-segment interbody lumbar arthrodesis using impacted cages: posterior unilateral approach versus posterior bilateral approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001, 87:129-134.
31. Fernandez-Fairen M., Sala P., Ramirez H., Gil J. A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (PhilaPa 1976) 2007, 32:395-401.
32. Fogel G.R., Toohey J.S., Neidre A., Brantigan J.W. Is one cage enough in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of unilateral single cage interbody fusion to bilateral cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007, 20:60-65.
33. Goyal N., Wimberley D.W., Hyatt A., et al. Radiographic and clinical outcomes after instrumented reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of mid and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009, 22:321-327.
34. Rousseau M.A., Lazennec J.Y., Bass E.C., Saillant G. Predictors of outcomes after posterior decompression and fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 2005, 14:55-60.
35. Scarone P., Lepeintre J.F., Bennis S., et al. Two-levels mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009, 52:275-280.
36. Kawaguchi Y., Matsui H., Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine (PhilaPa 1976) 1996, 21:941-944.
37. Kawaguchi Y., Yabuki S., Styf J., et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine (PhilaPa 1976) 1996, 21:2683-2688.
38. Bindal R.K., Glaze S., Ognoskie M., et al. Surgeon and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2008, 9:570-573.
39. Foley K.T., Simon D.A., Rampersaud Y.R. Virtual fluoroscopy: computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation. Spine (PhilaPa 1976) 2001, 26:347-351.
40. Gill K., Blumenthal S.L. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A 2-year follow-up of 238 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1993, 251:108-110.
41. Oertel M.F., Hobart J., Stein M., Schreiber V., Scharbrodt W. Clinical and methodological precision of spinal navigation assisted by 3D intraoperative O-arm radiographic imaging. J Neurosurg Spine 2011, 14(4):532-536.
42. Silbermann J., Riese F., Allam Y., Reichert T., Koeppert H., Gutberlet M. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 2011, 20(6):875-881.