Editorial: Citation analysis - focus on leading Australian nurse authors

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 20, Issue 23-24, 2011, Pages 3273-3275

  Hunt, Glenn E ^a   Cleary, Michelle ^b   Jackson, Debra ^c   Watson, Roger ^d   Thompson, David R ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^e AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; EDITORIAL; NURSE; PUBLISHING; WRITING;

AUSTRALIA; AUTHORSHIP; NURSES; PUBLISHING;

EID: 81155148557     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03917.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J & Wang L (2006) Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical Digital Libraries 3, 7.
2. Hack TF, Crooks D, Plohman J & Kepron E (2010) Research citation analysis of nursing academics in Canada: identifying success indicators. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66, 2542-2549.
3. Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 16569-16572.
4. Hunt GE & Cleary M (2011) Quality is better than quantity when it comes to publications. Journal of Clinical Nursing 20, 70-72.
5. Jacso P (2008) Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster. Library Trends 56, 784-815.
6. Taber DF (2005) Quantifying publication impact. Science 309, 2166.
7. Thompson DR & Watson R (2010) H-indices and the performance of professors of nursing in the UK. Journal of Clinical Nursing 19, 2957-2958.