Post-depositional remanent magnetization lock-in for marine sediments deduced from 10Be and paleomagnetic records through the Matuyama-Brunhes boundary

Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Volumn 311, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 39-52

  Suganuma, Yusuke ^a   Okuno, Jun'ichi ^a   Heslop, David ^b   Roberts, Andrew P ^b   Yamazaki, Toshitsugu ^c   Yokoyama, Yusuke ^d  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF POLAR RESEARCH   (Japan)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

10Be; Lock in depth; Matuyama Brunhes boundary; Paleointensity; Paleomagnetism; Post depositional remanent magnetization (PDRM)

Indexed keywords

LOCK-IN DEPTHS; MATUYAMA-BRUNHES BOUNDARIES; PALEOINTENSITY; PALEOMAGNETISM; POST-DEPOSITIONAL REMANENT MAGNETIZATION (PDRM);

ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; GEOMAGNETISM; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SUBMARINE GEOLOGY;

SEDIMENTOLOGY;

BERYLLIUM ISOTOPE; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC INTENSITY; MARINE SEDIMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; PALEOMAGNETISM; REMANENT MAGNETIZATION;

EID: 81155148245     PISSN: 0012821X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.08.038     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aster R.C., Borchers B., Thurber C. Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems 2005, Elsevier Academic Press, New York.
2. Bleil U., von Dobeneck T. Geomagnetic events and relative paleointensity records-clues to high-resolution paleomagnetic chronostratigraphies of Late Quaternary marine sediments?. Use of Proxies in Paleoceanography: Examples from the South Atlantic 1999, 635-654. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. G. Fischer, G. Wefer (Eds.).
3. Boudreau B.P. Is burial velocity a master parameter for bioturbation?. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1994, 58:1243-1249.
4. Boudreau B.P. Mean mixed depth of sediments: the wherefore and the why. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1998, 43:524-526.
5. Carter-Stiglitz B., Valet J.P., LeGoff M. Constraints on the acquisition of remanent magnetization in fine-grained sediments imposed by redeposition experiments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006, 245:427-437.
6. Channell J.E.T., Guyodo Y. The Matuyama Chronozone at ODP Site 982 (Rockall Bank): evidence for decimeter-scale magnetization lock-in depths. AGU Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 2004, 145:205-219.
7. Channell J.E.T., Kleiven H.F. Geomagnetic palaeointensities and astrochronological ages for the Matuyama-Brunhes boundary and the boundaries of the Jaramillo Subchron: palaeomagnetic and oxygen isotope records from ODP Site 983. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 2000, 358:1027-1047.
8. deMenocal P.B., Ruddiman W.F., Kent D.V. Depth of post-depositional remanence acquisition in deep-sea sediments - a case-study of the Brunhes-Matuyama reversal and oxygen isotopic stage-19.1. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1990, 99:1-13.
9. Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Smith, A., (eds), 2004. A Geologic Time Scale 2004. Cambridge University Press.
10. Guinasso N.L., Schink D.R. Quantitative estimates of biological mixing rates in abyssal sediments. J. Geophys. Res. 1975, 80:3032-3043.
11. Hamano Y. An experiment on the post-depositional remanent magnetization in artificial and natural sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1980, 51:221-232.
12. Hartl P., Tauxe L. A precursor to the Matuyama/Brunhes transition-field instability as recorded in pelagic sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1996, 138:121-135.
13. Horng C.S., Roberts A.P., Liang W.T. A 2.14-Myr astronomically tuned record of relative geomagnetic paleointensity from the western Philippine Sea. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108:2059. 10.1029/2001JB001698.
14. Hyodo M. Possibility of reconstruction of the past geomagnetic-field from homogeneous sediments. J. Geomagn. Geoelec. 1984, 36:45-62.
15. Ikehara K., Nishimura A. Physical property of sediments along the 20° N transect from Hawaii to Mariana and in the West Caroline Basin, 1992FY report on "Marine Geological Study on Element Cycles in Ocean". Geol. Surv. Jpn. 1993, 67-74.
16. Ikehara K., Nishimura A., Kawahata H., Iizasa K. Physical property of sediments from the Philippine Sea and West Caroline Basin, 1991FY report on "Marine Geological Study on Element Cycles in Ocean". Geol. Surv. Jpn. 1992, 134-164.
17. Inoue S., Yamazaki T. Geomagnetic relative paleointensity chronostratigraphy of sediment cores from the Okhotsk Sea. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2010, 291:253-266.
18. Irving E., Major A. Post-depositional detrital remanent magnetization in a synthetic sediment. Sedimentology 1964, 3:135-143.
19. Katari K., Tauxe L. Effects of pH and salinity on the intensity of magnetization in redeposited sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2000, 181:489-496.
20. Kent D.V. Post-depositional remanent magnetisation in deep sea sediment. Nature 1973, 246:32-34.
21. Kent D.V., Schneider D.A. Correlation of paleointensity variation records in the Brunhes/Matuyama polarity transition interval. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1995, 129:135-144.
22. Kiefer T., Sarnthein M., Erlenkeuser H., Grootes P.M., Roberts A.P. North Pacific response to millennial-scale changes in ocean circulation over the last 60kyr. Paleoceanography 2001, 16:179-189.
23. Knudsen M.F., Henderson G.M., Frank M., MacNiocaill C., Kubik P.W. In-phase anomalies in Beryllium-10 production and palaeomagnetic field behaviour during the Iceland Basin geomagnetic excursion. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2008, 265:588-599.
24. Lagarias J.C., Reeds J.A., Wright M.H., Wright P.E. Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J. Optim. 1998, 9:112-147.
25. Laj C., Kissel C., Mazaud A., Channell J.E.T., Beer J. North Atlantic palaeointensity stack since 75ka (NAPIS-75) and the duration of the Laschamp event. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 2000, 358:1009-1025.
26. Lal D., Peters B. Cosmic ray produced radioactivity on the Earth. Handbuch der Physik 1967, 551-612. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. S. Fluegge, K. Sitte (Eds.).
27. Lambe T.W., Whitman R.V. Soil Mechanics 1969, John Wiley, New York.
28. Liu Q.S., Roberts A.P., Rohling E.J., Zhu R.X., Sun Y.B. Post-depositional remanent magnetization lock-in and the location of the Matuyama-Brunhes geomagnetic reversal boundary in marine and Chinese loess sequences. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2008, 275:102-110.
29. Macri P., Sagnotti L., Dinarès-Turell J., Caburlotto A. Relative geomagnetic paleointensity of the Brunhes Chron and the Matuyama-Brunhes precursor as recorded in sediment core from Wilkes Land Basin (Antarctica). Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2010, 179:72-86.
30. Mazaud A., Sicre M.A., Ezat U., Pichon J.J., Duprat J., Laj C., Kissel C., Beaufort L., Michel E., Turon J.L. Geomagnetic-assisted stratigraphy and sea surface temperature changes in core MD94-103 (Southern Indian Ocean): possible implications for North-South climatic relationships around H4. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2002, 201:159-170.
31. Meynadier L., Valet J.P. Post-depositional realignment of magnetic grains and asymmetrical saw-tooth patterns of magnetization intensity. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1996, 140:123-132.
32. Officer C.B., Lynch D.R. Determination of mixing parameters from tracer distributions in deep-sea sediment cores. Mar. Geol. 1983, 52:59-74.
33. Otofuji Y., Sasajima S. A magnetization process of sediments: laboratory experiments on post-depositional remanent magnetization. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 1981, 66:241-259.
34. Roberts A.P., Winklhofer M. Why are geomagnetic excursions not always recorded in sediments? Constraints from post-depositional remanent magnetization lock-in modeling. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2004, 227:345-359.
35. Sagnotti L., Budillon F., Dinarès-Turell J., Iorio M., Macri P. Evidence for a variable paleomagnetic lock-in depth in the Holocene sequence from the Salerno Gulf (Italy): implications for "high-resolution" paleomagnetic dating. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2005, 6:Q11013. 10.1029/2005GC001043.
36. Schneider D.A., Kent D.V., Mello G.A. A detailed chronology of the Australasian impact event, the Brunhes-Matuyama geomagnetic polarity reversal, and global climate change. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1992, 111:395-405.
37. Singer B.S., Hoffman K.A., Coe R.S., Brown L.L., Jicha B.R., Pringle M.S., Chauvin A. Structural and temporal requirements for geomagnetic field reversal deduced from lava flows. Nature 2005, 434:633-636.
38. Stoner J.S., Channell J.E.T., Hillaire-Marcel C., Kissel C. Geomagnetic paleointensity and environmental record from Labrador Sea core MD95-2024: global marine sediment and ice core chronostratigraphy for the last 110kyr. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2000, 183:161-177.
39. Stott L., Poulsen C., Lund S., Thunell R. Super ENSO and global climate oscillations at millennial time scales. Science 2002, 297:222-226.
40. Suganuma Y., Yamazaki T., Kanamatsu T. South Asian monsoon variability during the past 800kyr revealed by rock magnetic proxies. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2009, 28:926-938.
41. 10Be evidence for delayed acquisition of remanent magnetization in marine sediments: implication for a new age for the Matuyama-Brunhes boundary. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010, 296:443-450.
42. Swan A.R.H., Sandilands M. Introduction to Geological Data Analysis 1995, Blackwell Press, Oxford.
43. Tauxe L., Yamazaki T. Paleointensities. Geomagnetism 2007, 5:509-563. Elsevier, New York. M. Kono (Ed.).
44. Tauxe L., Herbert T., Shackleton N.J., Kok Y.S. Astronomical calibration of the Matuyama-Brunhes boundary: consequences for magnetic remanence acquisition in marine carbonates and the Asian loess sequences. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1996, 140:133-146.
45. Tauxe L., Steindorf J.L., Harris A. Depositional remanent magnetization: toward an improved theoretical and experimental foundation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006, 244:515-529.
46. Thomson J., Brown L., Nixon S., Cook G.T., MacKenzie A.B. Bioturbation and Holocene sediment accumulation fluxes in the north-east Atlantic Ocean (Benthic Boundary Layer experiment sites). Mar. Geol. 2000, 169:21-39.
47. Valet J.P., Meynadier L. Geomagnetic field intensity and reversals during the past four million years. Nature 1993, 366:234-238.
48. Valet J.P., Meynadier L., Guyodo Y. Geomagnetic dipole strength and reversal rate over the past two million years. Nature 2005, 435:802-805.
49. Verosub K.L. Depositional and post-depositional processes in the magnetization of sediments. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 1977, 15:129-143.
50. Wagner G., Masarik J., Beer J., Baumgartner S., Imboden D., Kubik P.W., Synal H.A., Suter M. Reconstruction of the geomagnetic field between 20 and 60kyr BP from cosmogenic radionuclides in the GRIP ice core. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 2000, 172:597-604.
51. Yamazaki T. Water content of surface sediments in the south of the Nova-Canton Trough, Central Equatorial Pacific (GH82-4 AREA): relevance to acquisition of depositional remanent magnetization. Geol. Surv. Jpn. Cruise Rep. 1992, 22:127-133.
52. Yamazaki T., Oda H. A geomagnetic paleointensity stack between 0.8 and 3.0Ma from equatorial Pacific sediment cores. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2005, 6:Q11H20. 10.1029/2005GC001001.