Stepping Stones for Biological Invasion: A Bioeconomic Model of Transferable Risk

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 605-627

  Warziniack, Travis ^a   Finnoff, David ^b   Bossenbroek, Jonathan ^c   Shogren, Jason F ^b   Lodge, David ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioeconomic; Invasive species; Risk; Transferable risk; Welfare

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; ECOLOGY; RISKS;

BIO-ECONOMIC MODEL; BIOECONOMIC; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM; INVASIVE SPECIES; PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM; PREVENTION STRATEGIES; WELFARE;

ECOSYSTEMS;

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GOODS EXCHANGE; INVASIVE SPECIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; VALUATION; WELFARE ECONOMICS;

EID: 81155134956     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-011-9485-7     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. 100th Meridian Initiative (2007) Western quagga mussels: background information, produced for outreach by United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 25 March 2007.
2. American Sportfishing Association (2008) Sportfishing in America: an economic engine and conservation powerhouse.
3. Armour AF, Tsou JL, Wiancko PM (1993) Zebra mussels: the industrial impact. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international zebra mussel conference, Toronto.
4. Bennear LS, Stavins RN, Wagner AF (2005) Using revealed preferences to infer environmental benefits: evidence from recraetional fishing licenses. J Regul Econ 28(2): 157-179.
5. Bird P (1987) The transferability and depletability of externalities. J Environ Econ Manag 14(1): 54-57.
6. Bossenbroek JM, Johnson LE, Peters B, Lodge DM (2007) Forecasting the expansion of zebra mussels in the United States. Conserv Biol 21: 800-810.
7. Bossenbroek JM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Warziniack TW (2009) Advances in ecological and economical analysis of invasive species: dreissenid mussels as a case study. In: Keller RP, Lodge DM, Lewis MA, Shogren JF (eds) Bioeconomics of invasive species: integrating ecology, economics and management. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Carbone JC, Smith VK (2008) Evaluating policy interventions with general equilibrium externalities. J Public Econ 92: 1254-1274.
9. Connelly NA, O'Neil CR, Knuth BA, Brown TL (2007) Economic impacts of zebra mussels on drinking water treatment and electric power generation facilities. Environ Manag 40: 105-112.
10. Costello C, Springborn M, McAusland C, Solow A (2007) Unintended biological invasion: does risk vary by trading partner?. J Environ Econ Manag 54(3): 262-276.
11. Crocker TD, Tschirhart J (1992) Ecosystems, externalities, and economics. Environ Resour Econ 2: 551-567.
12. Deardorrf AV (2005) How robust is comparative advantage?. Rev Int Econ 13(5): 1004-1016.
13. De Melo J, Tarr D (1992) A general equilibrium analysis of US foreign trade and policy. MIT Press, Cambridge.
14. Deng Y (1996) Present and expected economic costs of zebra mussel damages to water users with Great Lakes water intakes. PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University.
15. Dervis K, De Melo J, Robinson S (1982) General equilibrium models for development policy. Cambridge University Press.
16. Drake JM, Bossenbroek JM (2004) The potential distribution of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in the USA. Bioscience 54: 931-941.
17. Finnoff D, Tschirhart J (2007) Linking dynamic economic and ecological general equilibrium models. Resour Energy Econ 30: 91-114.
18. Hertel TW, Tsigas ME (1997) Structure of GTAP. In: Hertel TW (eds) Global trade analysis: modeling and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Horvath TG, Lamberti GA, Lodge DM, Perry WL (1996) Zebra mussel dispersal in lake-stream systems: source-sink dynamics?. J N Am Benthol Soc 15: 564-575.
20. Jensen J, Rasmussen TN (2000) Allocation of CO2 emission permits: a general equilibrium analysis of policy instruments. J Environ Econ Manag 40: 111-136.
21. Johnson LE, Bossenbroek JM, Kraft CE (2006) Patterns and pathways in the post-establishment spread of non-indigenous aquatic species: the slowing invasion of North American inland lakes by the zebra mussel. Biol Invas 8: 475-489.
22. Kaval P, Loomis J (2003) Updated outdoor recreation use values with emphasis on National Park recreation. Report prepared for National Park Service, Fort Collins.
23. Kokoski MF, Smith VK (1987) A general equilibrium analysis of partial-equilibrium welfare measures: the case of climate change. Am Econ Rev 77(3): 331-341.
24. Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Lewis MA, Lambertini G (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc R Soc 269: 2407-2413.
25. Minessota IMPLAN Group (MIG) (2009).
26. Nalepa T (1998) Dramatic changes in benthic macroinvertebrate populations in Southern Lake Michigan, ANS Update, 4(3). Great Lakes Panel on Aquatic Nuisance Species and Great Lakes Commission, Ann Arbor.
27. Ohio Sea Grant (1996) Sea grant zebra mussel update: A 1995 report of research (part 1 of 2).
28. O'Neill CR (1997) Economic impact of zebra mussels-results from the 1995 National Zebra Mussel Information Clearinghouse Study. Great Lakes Res Rev 3(1): 35-44.
29. O'Neill CR (2006) Economic impact of zebra mussels-results from the 1995 National Zebra Mussel Information Clearinghouse Study (2006 Revision and Addendum provided by author). National Aquatic Nuisances Species Clearinghouse and New York Sea Grant.
30. Phillips S, Darland T, Sytsma M (2005) Potential economic impacts of zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River Basin. Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission, Portland.
31. Pimental D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50: 53-65.
32. Pimental D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52: 273-288.
33. Ricciardi A, Neves RJ, Rasmussen JB (1998) Impending extentinctions of North American freshwater mussels (Unionoida) following zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion. J Anim Ecol 67: 613-619.
34. Rothlisberger JD, Lodge DM, Cooke RM, Finnoff DC (2009) Future declines of the binational Laurentian Great Lakes fisheries: recognizing the importance of environmental and cultural change. Front Ecol Environ.
35. Rutherford TF (2009) Constant elasticity of substitution preferences: utility, demand, indirect utility and expenditure functions. Unpublished notes, ETH Zürich, 2 Nov 2009.
36. Shogren JF (2000) The economics of biological invasions, chapter risk reduction strategies against the 'explosive invader'. Edward Elgar Publishing.
37. Shogren JF, Crocker TD (1991) Cooperative and noncooperative protection against transferable and filterable externalities. Environ Resour Econ 1: 195-214.
38. Shoven JB, Whalley J (1992) Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. Shoven JB, Whalley J (1984) Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: an introduction and survey. J. Econ Lit 1007-1051.
40. Strayer DL (1991) Projected distributions of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, in North America. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48: 1389-1395.
41. Strayer DL, Hattala KA, Kahnle AW (2004) Effects of an invasive bivalve (Dreissena polymorpha) on fish in the Hudson River estuary. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61: 924-941.
42. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2006) 2006-2011 EPA strategic plan.
43. United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2008) Zebra and quagga mussel sighting distribution. Map produced by US Geological Survey, Gainesville, 25 Nov.
44. US Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2002) Census of agriculture.
45. Vilaplana JV, Hushack LJ (1994) Recreation and the zebra mussel in Lake Erie, Ohio. Technical Summary No. OHSU-TS-023, Ohio Sea Grant Program, Columbus.
46. Warziniack TW (2008) Trade-related externalities and spatial public goods in computable general equilibrium, PhD dissertation, University of Wyoming.
47. Water Science and Technology Board (WSTB): (2004) Managing the Columbia River: instream flows, water withdrawals, and Salmon survival. The National Academy Press, Washington.
48. Western Regional Panel on Aquatic Nusiance Species (2010) Quagga-zebra mussel action plan for western US waters. Aquatic Nusiance Species Task Force. http://anstaskforce. gov/QZAP/QZAP_FINAL_Feb2010. pdf.
49. Whalley J (1975) How Reliable is Partial Equilibrium Analysis?. Rev Econ Stat 57(3): 299-310.
50. Whittier TR, Ringold PL, Herlihy AT, Pierson SM (2008) A calcium-based invasion risk assessment for zebra and quagga mussels (Dreissena spp.). Front Ecol Environ 6(4): 180-184.