Multidimensional scaling and inverse distance weighting transform for image processing of hydrogeological structure in rock mass

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 411, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 25-36

  Mito, Yoshitada ^a   Ismail, Mohd Ashraf Mohamad ^b   Yamamoto, Takuji ^c  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING   (Malaysia)

^c KAJIMA CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cross hole hydraulic test; Inverse distance weighting; Multidimensional scaling; Preferential flow path

Indexed keywords

CONTINUUM MODEL; HYDRAULIC BEHAVIOR; HYDRAULIC DIFFUSIVITY; HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES; HYDRAULIC TESTING; HYDRAULIC TESTS; HYDROGEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES; IMAGING METHOD; IN-SITU EXPERIMENTS; INPUT DATAS; INVERSE DISTANCE WEIGHTING; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL SCALING; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; PREFERENTIAL FLOWS; ROCK MASS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION MAP;

CONTINUUM MECHANICS; EXPERIMENTS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; IMAGE PROCESSING; INPUT OUTPUT PROGRAMS; NUMERICAL METHODS; ROCK MECHANICS;

ROCKS;

DIFFUSIVITY; HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE; HYDROGEOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IN SITU MEASUREMENT; INVERSE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREFERENTIAL FLOW; ROCK MASS RESPONSE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 81155131777     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.09.018     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barker J.A. A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock. Water Resour. Res. 1988, 24(10):1796-1804.
2. Becker, M.W., Guiltinan, E., 2010. Cross-hole periodic hydraulic testing of inter well connectivity. In: Thirty-fifth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University.
3. Black J.H. Use of slug test in groundwater investigations. Water Serv. 1978, 82(985):174-178.
4. Black J.H., Kipp K.L. Determination of hydrogeological parameters using sinusoidal pressure tests - a theoretical appraisal. Water Resour. Res. 1981, 17(3):686-692.
5. Black, J.H., Barker, J.A., Noy, D.J., 1986. Crosshole Investigations - the Method Theory and Analysis of Crosshole Sinusoidal Pressure Tests in Fissured Rock, Stripa Project IR 86-03, SKB, Stockholm.
6. Bonin B., Colin M., Dutfoy A. Pressure building during the early stages of gas production in a radioactive waste repository. J. Nucl. Mater. 2000, 281(1):1-14.
7. Le Borgne T., et al. Comparison of alternative methodologies for identifying and characterizing preferential flow paths in heterogeneous aquifers. J. Hydrol. 2007, 345(3-4):134-148.
8. Bouwer H., Rice R.C. A slug test method for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells. Water Resour. Res. 1976, 12(3):423-428.
9. Butler J.J., Zhan X.Y. Hydraulic tests in highly permeable aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 2004, 40(12).
10. Cassiani G., Bohm G., Vesnaver A., Nicolich R. A geostatistical framework for incorporating seismic tomography auxiliary data into hydraulic conductivity. J. Hydrol. 1998, 206(1-2):58-74.
11. Chung I.M., Cho W.C., Heo J.H. Stochastic hydraulic safety factor for gas containment in underground storage caverns. J. Hydrol. 2003, 284(1-4):77-91.
12. Giramonti A.J., Lessard R.D., Blecher W.A., Smith E.B. Conceptual design of compressed air energy-storage electric-power systems. Appl. Energy 1978, 4(4):231-249.
13. Holmes, D.C., 1984. Crosshole Investigations - Equipment Design Considerations for Sinusoidal Pressure Tests, Stripa Project IR 84-05, SKB, Stockholm.
14. Holmes, D.C., Sehlstedt, M., 1985. Crosshole investigations - design of the hydraulic testing system. In: Symposium on in-situ Experiments in Granite Associated with the Disposal of Radioactive Waste. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and SKBF, Stockholm, pp. 203-213.
15. Houlsby A.C. Routine Interpretation of the lugeon water test. Quart. J. Eng. Geol. Hydro-Geol. 1976, 9(4):303-313.
16. Hsieh, P.A., 1987. Characterizing the hydraulic properties of fractured rock masses methodology and case studies. In: The 28th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). A. A. Balkema, Tucsan, AZ, pp. 465-472.
17. Hsieh P.A., Neuman S.P. Field determination of the 3-dimensional hydraulic conductivity tensor of anisotropic media 1. Theory. Water Resour. Res. 1985, 21(11):1655-1665.
18. Hsieh P.A., Neuman S.P., Stiles G.K., Simpson E.S. Field determination of the 3-dimensional hydraulic conductivity tensor of anisotropic media 2. Methodology and application to fractured rocks. Water Resour. Res. 1985, 21(11):1667-1676.
19. Kipp K.L. Type curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test. Water Resour. Res. 1985, 21(9):1397-1408.
20. Kiyoyama S. The present state of underground crude oil storage technology in Japan. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 1990, 5(4):343-349.
21. Kjorholt H., Broch E. The water curtain - a successful means of preventing gas leakage from high-pressure unlined rock caverns. Tunn. Undergr. Spae Technol. 1992, 7(2):127-132.
22. Kruskal, J.B., Wish, M., 1978. Multidimensional Scaling. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. SAGE Publication, London.
23. Lindblom U. The performance of water curtains surrounding rock caverns used for gas-storage. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 1989, 26(1):85-97.
24. Liu S.Y., Yeh T.C.J., Gardiner R. Effectiveness of hydraulic tomography: sandbox experiments. Water Resour. Res. 2002, 38(4).
25. Martinez-Landa L., Carrera J. A methodology to interpret cross-hole tests in a granite block. J. Hydrol. 2006, 325(1-4):222-240.
26. Meier P.M., Medina A., Carrera J. Geostatistical inversion of cross-hole pumping tests for identifying preferential flow channels within a shear zone. Ground Water 2001, 39(1):10-17.
27. Motojima I., Kono I., Nishigaki M. Crosshole permeability testing method in bedrock. Soils Found. 1993, 33(4):108-120.
28. Naugpal, P.S., 2001. Guide to Advanced Data Analysis: Using IDAMS Software. UNESCO, Division of Information and Informatics.
29. Park B.Y., et al. Determination of the hydraulic conductivity components using a three-dimensional fracture network model in volcanic rock. Eng. Geol. 2002, 66(1-2):127-141.
30. Pickens J.F., Grisak G.E., Avis J.D., Belanger D.W., Thury M. Analysis and interpretation of borehole hydraulic tests in deep boreholes - principles, model development, and applications. Water Resour. Res. 1987, 23(7):1341-1375.
31. Runchal A., Maini T. The impact of a high-level nuclear waste repository on the regional groundwater-flow. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. 1980, 17(5):253-264.
32. Shepard, D., 1964. A Two Dimensional Interpolation Function for Irregulallry Data Spaced, ACM Nat. Conf., pp. 517-524.
33. Tiren S.A., Askling P., Wanstedt S. Geologic site characterization for deep nuclear waste disposal in fractured rock based on 3D data visualization. Eng. Geol. 1999, 52(3-4):319-346.
34. Wackernagel H. Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction With Applications 1998, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
35. Wang M.Y., Kulatilake P.H.S.W. Understanding of hydraulic properties from configurations of stochastically distributed fracture networks. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22(8):1125-1135.
36. Yeh T.C.J., Liu S.Y. Hydraulic tomography: development of a new aquifer test method. Water Resour. Res. 2000, 36(8):2095-2105.
37. Zhu J.F., Yeh T.C.J. Characterization of aquifer heterogeneity using transient hydraulic tomography. Water Resour. Res. 2005, 41(7).
38. Zimmerman R.W., Bodvarsson G.S. Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures. Transport Porous Med. 1996, 23(1):1-30.