The ups and downs of social participation: Experiences of wheelchair users in Norway

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 25-26, 2011, Pages 2479-2489

  Hjelle, Kari Margrete ^a   Vik, Kjersti ^b  

^a BERGEN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

ICF; Participation; Wheelchair users

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; WHEELCHAIR;

DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; WHEELCHAIRS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81155124456     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.575525     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bricout JC, Gray DB. Community receptivity: the ecology of disabled persons' participation in the physical, political and social environments. Scand J Disabil Res 2006;8:1-21.
2. Cornwall A. Unpacking ''Participation'': models, meanings and practices. Community Dev J 2008;43:269-283.
3. Desrosiers J. Participation and occupation. Can J Occup Ther 2005;72:195-203.
4. Ebersold S. Affiliating participation for active citizenship. Scand J Disabil Res 2007;9:237-253.
5. Law MC. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56:640-649.
6. Sosial-og helsedirektoratet. Fra bruker til borger. En strategi for nedbygging av funksjonshemmende barrierer [From client to citizens: strategies for reducing disabling barriers]. Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste, Informasjonsforvaltning; 2001. p 22.
7. United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations. Internet. 2006. Electronic Citation. http://www.un.org/ disabilities/convention/conventionfull. shtml. Last accessed April 2009.
8. Molin M. Delaktighet inom handikappområdet-en begreppsanalys [Participation and disability-an analysis of concept]. In: Gustavsson AR, editor. Delaktighetens språk. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2004.
9. WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Internet. World Health Organisation; 2001. Electronic Citation. http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/. Last accessed 26 April 2011.
10. Björck-Å kesson E, Granlund M. Delaktighet-ett centralt begrepp i WHO:s klassifikation av funktionstillstånd, funktionshinder och hasa (ICF) [Participation-an important concept in WHO's classification of functioning, disability and health]. In: Gustavsson AR, editor. Deltaktighetens språk. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2004. pp 29-46.
11. Cardol M, De Jong BA, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:970-974. (Pubitemid 36032860)
12. Høyem A, editor. ICF i rehabilitering-forståelse og bruk [ICF in rehabilitation-understanding and use]. Tønsberg: Forlaget Aldring og Helse; 2008.
13. Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:569-576. (Pubitemid 41625832)
14. Høyem A, Thornquist E. Et kritisk blikk på ICF-måleverktøy og forståelsesmodell [A critical view of ICF-measurement and model of understanding]. Sykepleien Forskning 2010; 1:46-53.
15. Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for?. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:596-601. (Pubitemid 36806193)
16. Häggström A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:89-95. (Pubitemid 351403992)
17. Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whiteneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean?. An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445-1460.
18. Borell L, Asaba E, Rosenberg L, Schult ML, Townsend E. Exploring experiences of ''participation'' among individuals living with chronic pain. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:76-85. (Pubitemid 43878886)
19. Vik K, Nygård L, Borell L, Josephsson S. Agency and engagement: older adults' experiences of participation in occupation during home-based rehabilitation. Can J Occup Ther 2008;75:262-271.
20. King G, Law M, King S, Rosenbaum P, Kertoy MK, Young NL. A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2003;23:63-90. (Pubitemid 36443993)
21. Barbour RS, Kitzinger J, editors. Developing focus group research. Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage; 1999.
22. Krueger RA. Moderating focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
23. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2006.
24. Patton MQ, editor. Qualitative research & evaluation method. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.
25. Barne-og likestillingsdepartementet. Om lov om forbud mot diskriminering på grunn av nedsatt funksjonsevne (diskriminerings-og tilgjengelighetsloven) [The Norwegian antidiscrimination and accessibility act]. Oslo: Barne-og likestillingsdepartementet, Ot.prp; 2007.
26. Vik K, Lilja M, Nygård L. The influence of the environment on participation subsequent to rehabilitation as experienced by elderly people in Norway. Scand J Occup Ther 2007;14:86-95. (Pubitemid 46887876)
27. Cornwall A, Gaventa J. From users and choosers to makers and shapers: repositioning participation in social policy. Brighton, England: Institute of development studies, Brighton, Susses BN1 9RE England; 2001. pp 1-28.
28. Cornwall A. Democratising engagement: what the UK can learn from international experience. London: Demos; 2008.
29. Amdam R, Bergem R. Kriterium for evaluering av partnerskap og planlegging i kommunalt folkehelsearbeid [Criteria for evaluating partnerships and planning in municipal public health work]. Volda 2008. Report No.: 222.
30. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003.