Intraguild mutualism

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 627-633

  Crowley, Philip H ^a   Cox, John J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; MUTUALISM; PREDATION; RESOURCE USE; THEORETICAL STUDY; TROPHIC LEVEL;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOTA; FOOD CHAIN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; REVIEW; SYMBIOSIS;

ANIMALS; BIOTA; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 81055157887     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.011     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Stachowicz J.J. Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. Bioscience 2001, 51:235-246.
2. Bruno J.F., et al. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18:119-125.
3. Bronstein, J.L. and Holland, J.N. (2008) Mutualism. In Encyclopedia of Ecology, Vol. 3 (Jorgensen, S.E. and Fath, B.D., eds), pp. 2485-2491, Elsevier.
4. Brooker R.W., Callaway R.M. Facilitation in the conceptual melting pot. J. Ecol. 2009, 97:1117-1120.
5. Holt R.D. Emergent neutrality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:531-533.
6. Holt R.D. Prince Kropotkin meets the Hutchinsonian niche. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 2009, 55:1-10.
7. Lawton J.H. Are there general laws in ecology?. Oikos 1999, 84:177-192.
8. Root R.B. The guild concept and community analysis. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 1965, 46:177.
9. Wilson J.B. Guilds, functional types, and ecological groups. Oikos 1999, 86:507-522.
10. Inger R., Colwell R.K. Organization of contiguous communities of amphibians and reptiles in Thailand. Ecol. Monogr. 1977, 47:229-253.
11. Bonsall M.B., et al. Life history trade-offs assemble ecological guilds. Science 2004, 306:111-114.
12. Rosenheim J.A. Intraguild predation: New theoretical and empirical perspectives. Ecology 2007, 88:2679-2680.
13. Holt R.D. Community modules. Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial Ecosystems: 36th Symposium of the British Ecological Society 1997, 333-349. Blackwell Science. A.C. Grange, V.K. Brown (Eds.).
14. Bascompte J., Melián C.J. Simple trophic modules for complex food webs. Ecology 2005, 86:2868-2873.
15. Bshary R., et al. Interspecific communicative and coordinated hunting between groupers and giant moray eels in the Red Sea. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:2393-2398.
16. McNaughton S.J. Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: the Serengeti. Ecol. Monogr. 1985, 55:259-294.
17. Frank D.A., Groffman P.M. Ungulate versus topographic control of soil carbon and nitrogen processes in grasslands of Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 1998, 79:2229-2241.
18. Dickman C.R. Commensal and mutualistic interactions among terrestrial vertebrates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1992, 7:194-197.
19. Monkkonen M., et al. Mixed-species foraging aggregations and hetero-specific attraction in boreal bird communities. Oikos 1996, 77:127-136.
20. Hino T. Mutualistic and commensal organization of avian mixed-species foraging flocks in a forest of western Madagascar. J. Avian Biol. 1998, 29:17-24.
21. Short L.L., Horne J.F.M. Family Indicatoridae (Honeyguides). Handbook of the Birds of the World 2002, 274-295. Lynx Editions. del Hoyo (Ed.).
22. Bertness M.D., et al. Climate-driven interactions among rocky intertidal organisms caught between a rock and a hot place. Oecologia 1999, 120:446-450.
23. Gross K. Positive interactions among competitors can produce species-rich communities. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:929-936.
24. Lee C.T., Inouye B.D. Mutualism between consumers and their shared resource can promote competitive coexistence. Am. Nat. 2010, 175:277-288.
25. Kruuk H. The Spotted Hyena 1972, University of Chicago Press.
26. Creel S., Creel N.M. Limitations of African wild dogs by competition with larger carnivores. Conserv. Biol. 1996, 10:526-538.
27. Levine J.M. Indirect facilitation: evidence and predictions from a riparian community. Ecology 1999, 80:1762-1769.
28. Brooker R.W., et al. Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present and the future. J. Ecol. 2008, 96:18-34.
29. Vandermeer J.H. Indirect mutualism: variations on a theme by Stephen Levine. Am. Nat. 1980, 116:441-448.
30. Paine R.T. A note on trophic complexity and community stability. Am. Nat. 1969, 103:91-93.
31. Erdmann, G.G. and Peterson, R.M., Jr. (1992) Minimizing yellow-bellied sapsucker damage. In Northern Hardwood Notes 07 (Hutchinson, J.G., ed.) note 7. U.S. Dept. Agricul. For. Serv., N. Cen. Res. Sta.
32. Lloyd M., Dybas H.S. Periodical cicada problem. I. Population ecology. Evolution 1966, 20:133-149.
33. Holt R.D., Lawton J.H. The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 1994, 25:495-520.
34. Blaustein L., Chase J.M. Interactions between mosquito larvae and species that share the same trophic level. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52:489-507.
35. Lafferty K.D., et al. Food webs and parasites in a salt marsh ecosystem. Disease Ecology: Community Structure and Pathogen Dynamics 2005, 119-134. Oxford University Press. S. Collinge, C. Ray (Eds.).
36. Caro T. Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals 2005, University of Chicago Press.
37. Leibold M.A. A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: trophic regulation of abundance, incidence, and diversity patterns in communities. Am. Nat. 1996, 147:784-812.
38. Bronstein J.L., Barbosa P. Multitrophic/multispecies mutualistic interactions: the role of non-mutualists in shaping and mediating mutualisms. Multi-Trophic Level Interactions 2002, 44-65. Cambridge University Press. B. Hawkins, T. Tscharntke (Eds.).
39. Crumrine P.W., et al. Structure and dynamics of odonate communities: accessing habitat, responding to risk, and enabling reproduction. Dragonflies: Model Organisms for Ecological and Evolutionary Research 2008, 21-38. Oxford University Press. A. Córdoba-Aguilar (Ed.).
40. De Roos A.M., et al. Stage-specific predator species help each other to persist while competing for a single prey. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:13930-13935.
41. Shipley B. Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User's Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations, and Causal Inference 2000, Cambridge University Press.
42. Kline R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling 2011, Guilford Press. 3rd edn.
43. Bronstein J.L. Our current understanding of mutualism. Q. Rev. Biol. 1994, 69:31-51.
44. Chamberlain S.A., Holland J.N. Density-mediated, context-dependent consumer-resource interactions between ants and extrafloral nectar plants. Ecology 2008, 89:1364-1374.
45. Holland J.N., et al. Mutualisms as consumer-resource interactions. Ecology of Predator-Prey Interactions 2005, 17-33. Oxford University Press. P. Barbosa, I. Castellanos (Eds.).
46. Holland J.N., DeAngelis D.L. Consumer-resource theory predicts dynamic transitions between outcomes of interspecific interactions. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:1357-1366.
47. Holland J.N., DeAngelis D.L. A consumer-resource approach to the density-dependent population dynamics of mutualism. Ecology 2010, 91:1286-1295.
48. MacArthur R.H. Geographical Ecology 1972, Harper & Row.
49. Tilman D. Resource Competition and Community Structure 1982, Princeton University Press.
50. Bronstein J.L. The evolution of facilitation and mutualism. J. Ecol. 2009, 97:1160-1170.
51. Palmer T.M., et al. Competition and coexistence: exploring mechanisms that restrict and maintain diversity within mutualist guilds. Am. Nat. 2003, 162:S63-S79.
52. Stanton M.L. Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms. Am. Nat. 2003, 162:S10-S23.
53. Okuyama T., Holland J.N. Network structural properties mediate the stability of mutualistic communities. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:208-216.
54. Bascompte J. Disentangling the web of life. Science 2009, 325:416-419.
55. Thomson J. When is it mutualism?. Am. Nat. 2003, 162:S1-S9.
56. Cohen J.E., et al. Food webs are more than the sum of their tritrophic parts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:22335-22340.
57. Vance-Chalcraft H.D., et al. The influence of intraguild predation on prey suppression and prey release: a meta-analysis. Ecology 2007, 88. 2698-2696.
58. Bronstein, J.L. (1992) Seed predators as mutualists: ecology and evolution of the fig/pollinator interaction. In: Insect-Plant Interactions, Volume IV. (Bernays, E., ed), pp. 1-44, CRC Press.
59. Forup M.L., et al. The restoration of ecological interactions: plant-pollinator networks on ancient and restored heathlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:742-752.
60. Morales J.M., Vazquez D.P. The effect of space in plant-animal mutualistic networks: insights from a simulation study. Oikos 2008, 117:1362-1370.
61. Holt R.D., Huxel G.R. Alternative prey and the dynamics of intraguild predation: theoretical perspectives. Ecology 2007, 88:2706-2712.
62. Rudolf V.H. The interaction of cannibalism and omnivory: consequences for community dynamics. Ecology 2007, 88:2697-2705.
63. Janssen A., et al. Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology 2007, 88:2713-2719.
64. Amarasekare P. Trade-offs, temporal variation, and species coexistence in communities with intraguild predation. Ecology 2007, 88:2720-2728.
65. Janzen D.H. The natural history of mutualisms. The Biology of Mutualism 1985, 40-99. Croom Helm. D.H. Boucher (Ed.).
66. Power M.E. Resource enhancement by indirect effects of grazers: armored catfish, algae, and sediment. Ecology 1990, 71:897-904.
67. Schindler D.E., Scheuerell M.D. Habitat coupling in lake ecosystems. Oikos 2002, 98:177-189.
68. Walker B.H. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv. Biol. 1992, 6:18-23.
69. Sarrazin F., Barbault R. Reintroduction: challenges and lessons for basic ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996, 11:474-477.