Dropping your tools: Exploring when and how theories can serve as blinders in is research

Communications of the Association for Information Systems

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 283-294

  Holmström, Jonny ^a   Truex, Duane ^b,c  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Actor network theory; Research diversity; Structuration theory; Theory

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

ACTOR NETWORK THEORY; IS RESEARCHES; PROBLEM DOMAIN; STRUCTURATION THEORY; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; THEORETICAL APPROACH; THEORY;

POLARIZATION;

EID: 81055146982     PISSN: 15293181     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17705/1cais.02819     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alter, S. (2003) 18 Reasons Why IT-Reliant Work Systems Should Replace The IT Artifact as the Core Subject Matter of the IS Field, Communications of the Association for Information Systems (12)23, pp. 366-395.
2. Banville, C. and M. Landry (1989) Can the Field of MIS Be Disciplined? Communications of the ACM (32), Jan., pp. 48-60.
3. Benbasat, I., D.K. Goldstein, and M. Mead (1987) The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems", MIS Quarterly (11)3, Sept., pp. 369-383.
4. Benbasat, I. and R. Zmud (1999) Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance", MIS Quarterly (23)1, Mar., pp. 3-16.
5. Benbasat, I. and R.W. Zmud (2003) The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties", MIS Quarterly (27)2, June, pp. 183-194.
6. Davenport, T.H. and M.L. Markus (1999) Rigor vs. Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud, MIS Quarterly (23)2, pp. 19-23.
7. Davies, L.J. and AT. Wood-Harper (1989) Information Systems Development: Theoretical Frameworks", Journal of Applied Systems Analysis (16), pp. 61-73.
8. Dutton, W. (1988) Letter to the Editor", MIS Quarterly (34)12, p. 1.
9. Fitzgerald, B. and D. Howcroft (1998) Towards Dissolution of the IS Research Debate: From Polarisation to Polarity-, Journal of Information Technology (13)4, pp. 313-326.
10. Gregor, S. (2006) The Nature of Theory in Information Systems", MIS Quarterly (30)3, pp. 611-642.
11. Hanseth, O. (2005) Beyond Metaphysics and Theory Consumerism; A Comment to Rose, Jones and Truex Socio-Theoretic Accounts of IS: The Problem of Agency", Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (17)1, pp. 159-166.
12. Hirschheim, R. and H. Klein (1992) A Research Agenda for Future Information Systems Development Methodologies" in Cotterman, W. and J. Senn (eds.) Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development, volume 1, WiIey Series in Information Systems, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 235-251.
13. Hirschheim, R. (1989) Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development", Communications of the ACM (32)10, pp. 1199-1216.
14. Holmström, J. (2005) Theorizing in IS Research: What Comes First and What Comes After? Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (17)1, pp. 167-174.
15. Jones, M.R. (2000) The Moving Finger: The Use of Social Theory in WG8.2 Conference Papers, 1975-1999" in Baskerville, R., J. Stage, and J.I. DeGross (eds.) Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 15-31.
16. Keil, M. (1995) Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation", MIS Quarterly (19)4, pp. 421-447.
17. Keil, M. and J. Flatto (1999) Information Systems Project Escalation: A Reinterpretation Based on Options Theory", Accounting, Management and Information Technologies (9)2, pp. 115-139.
18. Keil, M., J. Mann, and A. Rai (2000) Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models", MIS Quarterly (24)4, pp. 631-664.
19. Keil, M. and D. Robey (1999) Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action", Journal of Management Information Systems (15)4, pp. 63-87.
20. Keil, M., D. Truex, and R. Mixon (1995) The Effects of Sunk Cost and Project Completion on Information-Technology Project Escalation", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (42)4, pp. 372-381.
21. Klein, H. and F. Rowe (2008) Marshaling the Professional Experience of Doctoral Students: A Contribution to the Practical Relevance Debate", MIS Quarterly (32)4, pp. 675-686.
22. Koch, N. et al. (2002) IS Research Relevance Revisited: Subtle Accomplishments, Unfulfilled Promise, or Serial Hypocrisy? Communications of the Association for Information Systems (8), pp. 330-346.
23. Landry, M. and C. Banville (1992) A Disciplined Methodological Pluralism for MIS Research", Accounting, Management and Information Technologies (2)2, pp. 77-98.
24. Lyytinen, K (1999) Empirical Research in Information Systems: On the Relevance of Practice in Thinking of IS Research", MIS Quarterly (23)1, pp. 25-27.
25. Lyytinen, K. and R. Hirschheim (1988) Information Systems as Rational Discourse: An Application of Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action", Scandinavian Journal of Management (4)1-2, pp. 19-30.
26. Lyytinen, K and J. King (2004) Nothing at the Center? Information Systems as a Reference Discipline? Journal of the Association for Information Systems (5)6, pp. 222-246.
27. Lyytinen, K and H.K. Klein (1985) The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas as a Basis for a Theory of Information Systems" in Mumford, E. et al. (eds.) Research Methods in Information Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, pp. 219-236.
28. McMaster, T. and D. Wastell (2005) The Agency of Hybrids: Overcoming the Symmetrophobic Block", Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (17)1, p. 175.
29. Mingers, J. and G. Walsham (2010) -Toward Ethical Information Systems: The Contribution of Discourse Ethics," MIS Quarterly (34)4, pp.833-854.
30. Montealegre, R. and M. Keil (2000) De-escalating Information Technology Projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport", MIS Quarterly (24)3, pp. 417-447.
31. Moody, D.L. (2000) Building Links Between IS Research and Professional Practice: Improving the Relevance and Impact of IS Research, International Conference on IS (ICIS 2000), Brisbane, Australia, pp. 351-360.
32. Myers, M. and H.K. Klein (2011) -A Set of Principles for Conducting Critical Research in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly (35)1, pp.17-36.
33. Orlikowski, W.J. (1992) The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations", Organization Science (3)3, pp. 398-429.
34. Orlikowski, W.J. (2000) Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations", Organization Science (11)4, July-Aug., pp. 404-428.
35. Orlikowski, W.J. (2005) Material Works: Exploring the Situated Entanglement of Technological Performativity and Human Agency", Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (17)1, p. 183.
36. Orlikowski, W.J. and C.S. Iacono (2001) Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the ‗IT'in IT Research-A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact", Information Systems Research (12)2, pp. 121-134.
37. Orlikowski, W.J. and J.J. Baroudi (1991) Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions", Information Systems Research (2)1, pp. 1-28.
38. Robey, D. and M.L. Markus (1998) Beyond Rigor and Relevance: Producing Consumable Research about Information Systems", Information Resources Management Journal (11)1, pp. 7-15.
39. Rose, J. and D. Truex (2000) -Machine Agency as Perceived Autonomy: An Action Perspective" in Baskerville, R., J. Stage, and J.I. DeGross (eds.) IS 2000 The Social and Organizational Perspective on Research and Practice in Information Technology, Aalborg, Denmark: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 371-390.
40. Rose, J., M. Jones, and D. Truex (2005a) Socio-Theoretic Accounts of IS: The Problem of Agency", Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (17), pp. 133-152.
41. Rose, J., M. Jones, and D. Truex (2005b) The Problem of Agency Re-visited", Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (17), pp. 187-196.
42. Rowe, F. and D. Truex (2007) Issues at the IS Core: How French Scholars Inform the Discourse" in 28th International Conference on Information Systems, Paper 134, Montreal, Canada: AIS.
43. Sawyer, S. and T. Chen (2002) Conceptualizing Information Technology in the Study of Information Systems: Trends and Issues" in Wynn, E. et al. (eds.) Global and Organizational Discourse About Information Technology, London, England: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 109-131.
44. Sawyer, S. et al. (2001) What Do We Mean by Information Technology? Perspectives on Studying Computing" in Fitzgerald, B., N. Russo, and J. DeGross (eds.) Realigning Research and Practice in IS Development: The Social and Organisational Perspective, New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers, in press.
45. Straub, D. (2009) Creating Blue Oceans of Thought via Highly Citable Articles", Management Information Systems Quarterly (33)4, p. 2.
46. Straub, D. and S. Ang (2008) Editor's Comments: Readability and the Relevance Versus Rigor Debate", Management Information Systems Quarterly (32)4, p. 2.
47. Truex, D. and R. Baskerville (1998) Deep Structure or Emergence Theory: Contrasting Theoretical Foundations for Information Systems Development", Information Systems Journal (8)2, pp. 99-118.
48. Truex, D. et al. (2011) -The Scholarly Influence of Heinz Klein: Ideational and Social Measures of His Impact on IS Research and IS Scholars," European Journal of Information Systems (20)4, pp. forthcoming.
49. Truex, D., J. Holmström, and M. Keil (2006) Theorizing in Information System Research: A Reflexive Analysis on the Adaptation of Theory to Information System Research", Journal of the Association for Information Systems (17)12, Dec, pp. 797-821.
50. Walsham, G. (2005) Agency Theory: Integration or a Thousand Flowers? Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (17)1, pp. 153-158.
51. Watson, R. (2001) A Good Theory", MIS Quarterly (25)4, pp. 5.
52. Weber, R. (2003a) Editor's Comment: Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact", MIS Quarterly (27)2, June, pp. 3-11.
53. Weber, R. (2003b) Editor's Comments: Theoretically Speaking", MIS Quarterly (27)3, Sept., pp. 3-13.
54. Weick, K. (1996) Drop Your Tools: An Allegory for Organizational Studies", Administrative Science Quarterly (41)2, pp. 301-313.
55. Weick, K.E. (1995) What Theory Is Not, Theorizing IS", Administrative Science Quarterly (40)3, pp. 385-390.
56. Yin, R.K (1994) Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 2nd edition, London, England: Sage.