The end of the net as we know it? deep packet inspection and internet governance

New Media and Society

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1142-1160

  Bendrath, Ralf ^a   Mueller, Milton ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Actor centered institutionalism; censorship; deep packet inspection; disruptive technology; internet governance; internet service providers; network neutrality; privacy; social construction of technology; socio technical systems; surveillance

Indexed keywords

EID: 81055124879     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444811398031     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. AndersonN (2010) EU has doubts as ISP rolls out DPI for copyright enforcement. Ars Technica, 26January2010. Available at: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/01/eu-has-doubts-as-isp-rolls-out-dpi-for-copyright-enforcement.ars (consulted April 2010).
2. Artan NS,Chao HJ.Design and analysis of a multipacket signature detection system.International Journal of Security and Networks. 2007;2 (1-2): 122-136.
3. BoyleJ (1997) Foucault in Cyberspace: Surveillance, Sovereignty, and Hard-Wired Censors. Available at: http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/foucault.htm (consulted April 2010).
4. Brey PInside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-production of Technology and Society. Harbers H, ed. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2005:61-84.
5. Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-1. Ottawa, Canada:; 2008 2008:.
6. Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2009-657. Ottawa:; 2009 2009:.
7. Carpenter BRFC 1958: Architectural Principles of the Internet. Fremont: Internet Architecture Board, Network Working Group; 1996:.
8. Chester J.The end of the internet?.The Nation. 2006;:.
9. Christensen CThe Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1997:.
10. Danneels E.Disruptive technology reconsidered: A research agenda.Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2004;21:246-258.
11. DedmanBSullivanB (2008) ISPs are Pressed to Become Child Porn Cops. MSNBC.com, 16October. Available at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27198621/ (consulted February 2010).
12. Deibert R,Palfrey J,Zittrain J,Rohozinski R,Haraszti MAccess Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2010:.
13. Dharmapurikar S,Krishnamurthy P,Sproull T,Lockwood J.Deep packet inspection using parallel bloom filters.IEEE Micro. 2004;24 (1): 52-61.
14. Dierkes M,Hoffmann U,Marz LLeitbild und Technik. Zur Entstehung und Steuerung technischer Innovationen. Berlin: Edition Sigma; 1992:.
15. Federal Communications Commission (2008) Memorandum Opinion and Order. FCC 08-183. Released 20 August. Available at: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-183A1.pdf (consulted April 2010).
16. Federal Communications Commission (2009) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Preserving an Open Internet, GN Docket No. 09-191, 22 October.
17. Gillespie TWired Shut: Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007:.
18. Joint Committee of the Higher Education and Entertainment Communities (2007) Report on the Workshop on Requirements for Technological Control of Illegal File Sharing on College and University Networks (ID: CSD5170). EDUCAUSE Policy Office (10/03/2007). 19-20 April 2007. Washington, DC: Educause. Available at: http://www.educause.edu/Resources/WorkshoponRequirementsforTechn/162056 (consulted April 2010).
19. KarpinskyR (2009) Comcast's Congestion Catch-22. Connected Planet23January. Available at: http://connectedplanetonline.com/residential_services/news/comcast-congestion-0123/ (consulted April 2010).
20. Klang MDisruptive Technology: Effects of Technology Regulation on Democracy. Göteborg: University Department of Applied Information Technology; 2006:.
21. Kleinz T.Bundesregierung treibt Netzblockaden gegen Kinderpornografie voran.Heise News. 2009 2009;:.
22. Knill C,Lehmkuhl D.Private actors and the state: Internationalization and changing patterns of governance.Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. 2002;15 (1): 41-63.
23. Kumar S,Turner J,Williams J.Advanced Algorithms for fast and scalable deep packet inspection. Paper presented at the 2006 ACM/IEEE symposium on Architecture for Networking and Communications Systems; 2006San Jose, CA; 2006.
24. Lessig LCode and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books; 1999:.
25. Lessig LThe Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. London: Vintage Books; 2002:.
26. Mateus A,Peha J.Dimensions of P2P and digital piracy in a university campus. Paper presented at the TPRC Conference; 2008Arlington, VA; 2008.
27. Mayntz R,Scharpf FGesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und Politische Steuerung. Mayntz RScharpf RW, ed. Frankfurt am Main: Campus; 1995:.
28. Mayntz R,Schneider VGesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus; 1995:.
29. McIntyre TJComputer & Law. Mayntz RScharpf FW, ed. 2008a 2008:.
30. McIntyreTJ (2008b) SABAM v. Scarlet: Belgian ISP Released from Obligation to Filter Network for Illegal Downloads. IT Law in Ireland (Blog), 26October. Available at: http://www.tjmcintyre.com/2008/10/sabam-v-scarlet-belgian-isp-released.html (consulted December 2009).
31. McIntyreTJ (2009) 'Three Strikes' for Ireland - Eircom, Music Industry Settle Filtering CaseIT Law in Ireland (Blog), 29January. Available at: http://tjmcintyre.com/2009/01/three-strikes-for-ireland-eircom-music.html (consulted January 2010).
32. OhmP (2008) The Rise and Fall of Invasive ISP Surveillance. University of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-22. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1261344 (consulted November 2009).
33. Renals P,Jacoby G.Blocking Skype through deep packet inspection. Paper presented at 42nd International Conference on System Sciences; 2009Hawaii; 2009.
34. Rhoads C,Chao L.Iran's web spying aided by western technology.Wall Street Journal. 2009;:.
35. Riley C,Scott BDeep Packet Inspection: The End of the Internet as we Know it?. Washington, DC: Free Press; 2009:.
36. Saltzer J,Reed D,Clark D.End-to-end arguments in system design.ACM Transactions on Computer Systems. 1984;2 (4): 277-288.
37. Scharpf FGames Real Actors Play. Actor-centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview; 1997:.
38. Schneider VStaat und Technische Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag; 1999:.
39. Schneider V,Mayntz RTheoriebausteine der Techniksoziologie. Halfmann JBechmann GRammert W, ed. Frankfurt am Main: Campus; 1995:.
40. Singel R.Whistle-blower outs NSA spy room.Wired News. 2006;:.
41. SourdisI (2007) Designs and algorithms for packet and content inspection. PhD dissertation, Technische Universiteit Delft.
42. Topolski RNebuAd and Partner ISPs: Wiretapping, Forgery and Browser Hijacking. Washington, DC: Free Press; 2008:.
43. Wagner B.Modifying the data stream: Deep packet inspection and internet censorship. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual GigaNet Symposium; 2008Hyderabad, India; 2008.
44. Walker J.Ende des Internet?.Telepolis. 2004 2004;:.
45. Weingart PTechnik als sozialer Prozeß. Weingart P, ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1989:.
46. Wu T.Network neutrality, broadband discrimination.Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law. 2003;2:141.
47. Zittrain JThe Future of the Internet - and How to Stop it. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press; 2008:.