Influence of cycle ergometer type and sex on assessment of 30-second anaerobic capacity and power

International Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 688-692

  Leicht, A S ^a   Sealey, R M ^a   Sinclair, W H ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

all out; cycling performance; ergometry; exercise test; gender; Wingate test

Indexed keywords

LACTIC ACID;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD; ARTICLE; BICYCLE; BLOOD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD; BICYCLING; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; LACTIC ACID; MALE; PHYSICAL EXERTION; SEX FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80955180607     PISSN: 01724622     EISSN: 14393964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1271769     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bishop D, Spencer M, Duffield R, Lawrence S. The validity of a repeated sprint ability test. J Sci Med Sport 2001 4 19-29 (Pubitemid 32298181)
2. Bogdanis G, Papaspyrou A, Lakomy H, Nevill M. Effects of inertia correction and resistive load on fatigue during repeated sprints on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer. J Sports Sci 2008 26 1437-1445
3. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982 14 377-381 (Pubitemid 13215050)
4. Bushman B, Masterson G, Nelsen J. Anaerobic power performance and the menstrual cycle: eumenorrheic and oral contraceptive users. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2006 46 132-137 (Pubitemid 43742460)
5. Dotan R, Bar-Or O. Load optimization for the Wingate Anaerobic Test. Eur J Appl Physiol 1983 51 409-417 (Pubitemid 13005077)
6. Evans JA, Quinney HA. Determination of resistance settings for anaerobic power testing. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1981 6 53-56 (Pubitemid 11088937)
7. Franklin KL, Gordon RS, Davies B, Baker JS. Assessing accuracy of measurements for a Wingate Test using the Taguchi method. Res Sports Med 2008 16 1-14 (Pubitemid 351457960)
8. Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. International Journal of Sports Medicine Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research. Int J Sports Med 2009 30 701-702
9. Hazell TJ, Macpherson RE, Gravelle BM, Lemon PW. 10 or 30-s sprint interval training bouts enhance both aerobic and anaerobic performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 110 153-160
10. Hill DW, Smith JC. Gender difference in anaerobic capacity: role of aerobic contribution. Br J Sports Med 1993 27 45-48 (Pubitemid 23104686)
11. Inbar O, Bar-Or O, Skinner JS. The Wingate Anaerobic Test. Champaign, USA Human Kinetics 1996
12. Masterson G. The impact of menstrual phases on anaerobic power performance in collegiate women. J Strength Cond Res 1999 13 325-329
13. Maxwell BF, Withers RT, Ilsley AH, Wakim MJ, Woods GF, Day L. Dynamic calibration of mechanically, air- and electromagnetically braked cycle ergometers. Eur J Appl Physiol 1998 78 346-352 (Pubitemid 28425151)
14. Micklewright D, Alkhatib A, Beneke R. Mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer: performance and energy cost of the Wingate Anaerobic Test. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006 96 748-751
15. Morton AR, Pyke FS, Roberts AD. A comparison of work capacity scores using two different types of bicycle ergometers. Aust J Sports Med 1974 5 27-30
16. Patton JF, Murphy MM, Frederick FA. Maximal power outputs during the Wingate anaerobic test. Int J Sports Med 1985 6 82-85 (Pubitemid 15121594)
17. Reiser RF 2nd, Broker JP, Peterson ML. Inertial effects on mechanically braked Wingate power calculations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000 32 1660-1664
18. Reiser RF 2nd, Maines JM, Eisenmann JC, Wilkinson JG. Standing and seated Wingate protocols in human cycling. A comparison of standard parameters. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002 88 152-157 (Pubitemid 40826321)
19. Repco Cycle Company. Repco Fitness Products Exertech Super-Monitor Instruction Manual. Huntingdale, Australia Repco Cycle Company
20. Sands WA, McNeal JR, Ochi MT, Urbanek TL, Jemni M, Stone MH. Comparison of the Wingate and Bosco anaerobic tests. J Strength Cond Res 2004 18 810-815 (Pubitemid 39627324)
21. Souissi N, Gauthier A, Sesboue B, Larue J, Davenne D. Circadian rhythms in two types of anaerobic cycle leg exercise: force-velocity and 30-s Wingate tests. Int J Sports Med 2004 25 14-19 (Pubitemid 38210473)
22. Telford RD. Specific performance analysis with air-braked ergometers. Part II: Short duration work and power. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1982 22 349-357 (Pubitemid 13157012)
23. Telford RD, Hooper LA, Chennells MHD. Calibration and comparison of air-braked and mechanically-braked bicycle ergometers. Aust J Sports Med 1980 12 40-46
24. Weber CL, Chia M, Inbar O. Gender differences in anaerobic power of the arms and legs a scaling issue. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006 38 129-137 (Pubitemid 43062968)
25. Withers RT, Sherman WM, Clark DG, Esselbach PC, Nolan SR, Mackay MH, Brinkman M. Muscle metabolism during 30, 60 and 90s of maximal cycling on an air-braked ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 1991 63 354-362
26. Zagatto AM, Beck WR, Gobatto CA. Validity of the running anaerobic sprint test for assessing anaerobic power and predicting short-distance performances. J Strength Cond Res 2009 23 1820-1827
27. Zupan MF, Arata AW, Dawson LH, Wile AL, Payn TL, Hannon ME. Wingate Anaerobic Test peak power and anaerobic capacity classifications for men and women intercollegiate athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2009 23 2598-2604