|
Volumn 73, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1460-1468
|
Deliberating Tarceva: A case study of how British NHS managers decide whether to purchase a high-cost drug in the shadow of NICE guidance
|
Author keywords
Cancer; Decision making; Habermas; High cost drugs; Managers; NHS commissioners; NICE guidance; Rationing; UK; Wales
|
Indexed keywords
DOCETAXEL;
ERLOTINIB;
LENALIDOMIDE;
SUNITINIB;
TRABECTEDIN;
CANCER;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DECISION MAKING;
DISEASE TREATMENT;
DRUG;
DRUG PRESCRIBING;
GUIDELINE;
HEALTH WORKER;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS;
COST CONTROL;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DISCOURSE ANALYSIS;
DRUG APPROVAL;
DRUG COST;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG PREFERENCE;
DRUG SAFETY;
DRUG USE;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
HEALTH CARE ACCESS;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HEALTH CARE FINANCING;
HUMAN;
LUNG NON SMALL CELL CANCER;
MANAGER;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PHARMACIST;
POPULATION RESEARCH;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
PURCHASING;
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
STANDARDIZATION;
CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG;
DECISION MAKING;
DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES;
FEMALE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HEALTH CARE COSTS;
HUMANS;
LUNG NEOPLASMS;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHARMACOPOEIAS AS TOPIC;
PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITORS;
QUINAZOLINES;
STATE MEDICINE;
TAPE RECORDING;
UNITED KINGDOM;
|
EID: 80955145692
PISSN: 02779536
EISSN: 18735347
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.023 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (21)
|
References (32)
|