Parameters of Tsunami Source Versus Earthquake Magnitude

Pure and Applied Geophysics

Volumn 168, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2023-2031

  Bolshakova, Anna V ^a   Nosov, Mikhail A ^a  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Bottom earthquake; co seismic deformation; initial elevation; moment magnitude; tsunami source

Indexed keywords

BOTTOM EARTHQUAKE; COSEISMIC DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDES; EARTHQUAKE SOURCE; INITIAL ELEVATION; MOMENT MAGNITUDES; SLIP DISTRIBUTION; SOURCE PARAMETERS; UPPER LIMITS; WATER VOLUMES;

DEFORMATION; TSUNAMIS;

EARTHQUAKES;

ANALYTICAL METHOD; COSEISMIC PROCESS; DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; ELEVATION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; SEISMIC MOMENT; SOURCE PARAMETERS; TSUNAMI EVENT;

EID: 80955143422     PISSN: 00334553     EISSN: 14209136     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-011-0285-3     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alekseev, A. S. and Gusyakov, V. K. (1976), Numerical modeling of tsunami and seismic surface wave generation by a submarine earthquake, Proc. Tsunami Res. Symp. (eds. Heath R. A. and Creswell M. M.) Roy. Soc. New Zealand, Wellington, 243-252.
2. Bassin, C., Laske, G., and Masters, G., (2000), The Current Limits of Resolution for Surface Wave Tomography in North America, EOS Trans. AGU, 81, F897.
3. Dotsenko, S. F., Soloviev, S. L. (1990), Mathematical modeling of tsunami excitation process by displacement of the ocean bottom, Tsunami researches (in Russian), 4, 8-20, Moscow.
4. Gisler, G. R. (2008), Tsunami simulations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 40, 71-90.
5. Grilli, S. T., Ioualalen, J. M., Kirby, J. T., Watts, P., Asavant, J., and Shi, F. (2007), Source Constraints and Model Simulation of the December 26, 2004, Indian Ocean Tsunami, Journal of Ocean Engineering, 133(6), 414-428.
6. Hammack, J. L. (1973), A note on tsunamis: their generation and propagation in an ocean of uniform depth. J. Fluid Mech., 60, 769-799.
7. Handbook for Tsunami Forecast in the Japan Sea, (Earthquake and Tsunami Observation Division, Seismological and Volcanological Department, Japan Meteorological Agency. 22 P. 2001).
8. Hatori, T. (1970), Vertical crustal deformation and tsunami energy, Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, 48, 171-188.
9. Iida, K. (1963), Magnitude, energy and generation mechanism of tsunamis and a catalogue of earthquakes associated with tsunamis, Proc. Tsunami Meet. Assoc 10th Pacific Sci Congr., 1961, I. U. G. G. Monogr. No. 24, 7-18.
10. Kajiura, K. (1981), Tsunami energy in relation to parameters of the earthquake fault model, Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, 56, 415-440.
11. Kanamori, H (1977), The energy release in great earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 2981-2987.
12. Kanamori, H., Anderson, D. L. (1975), Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65, 1073-1095.
13. Kanamori, H., Brodsky, E. E. (2004), The physics of earthquakes, Rep. Prog. Phys., 67, 1429-1496.
14. Kowalik, Z., Knight, W., Logan, T., and Whitmore, P. (2005), Numerical modeling of the global tsunami: Indonesian tsunami of December 26 2004, Sci. Tsunami Hazard, 23(1), 40-56.
15. Levin, B. W., and Nosov, M. A., Physics of Tsunamis (Springer 2008).
16. Nosov, M. A. (1998), On the directivity of dispersive tsunami waves excited by piston-type and traveling-wave sea-floor motion, Volcanol. Seismol., 19, 837-844.
17. Nosov, M. A. (1999), Tsunami Generation in Compressible Ocean, Phys. Chem. Earth (B), 24(5), 437-441.
18. Nosov, M. A. and Kolesov, S. V. (2007), Elastic oscillations of water column in the 2003 Tokachi-oki tsunami source: in situ measurements and 3-D numerical modeling, Natural Hazards and Earth System. Sciences, 7, 243-249.
19. Nosov, M. A. and Kolesov, S. V. (2010), Optimal initial conditions for simulation of seismotectonic tsunamis, Pure and Applied Geophysics., doi: 10. 1007/s00024-010-0226-6.
20. Nosov, M. A., and Kolesov, S. V. (2009), Method of Specification of the Initial Conditions for Numerical Tsunami Modeling, Moscow University Physics Bulletin, 64(2), 208-213.
21. Okada, Y. (1985), Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75(4), 1135-1154.
22. Okada, Y. (1995), Simulated empirical law of coseismic crustal deformation, J. Phys. Earth, 43, 697-713.
23. Okal, E. A. (1988), Seismic parameters controlling far-field tsunami amplitudes: a review, Natural Hazards, 1, 67-96.
24. Okal, E. A. (2003), Normal mode energetics for far-field tsunamis generated by dislocations and landslides, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 160, 2189-2221.
25. Saito, T. and Furumura, T. (2009), Three dimensional tsunami generation simulation due to the sea-bottom deformation and its interpretation based on the linear theory, Geophys. J. Int., doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-246X. 2009. 04206. x.
26. Sato, R. (1979), Theoretical basis on relationships between focal parameters and earthquake magnitude, J. Phys. Earth, 27, 353-372.
27. Tanioka, Y., and Satake, K. (1996), Tsunami generation by horizontal displacement of ocean bottom, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23(8), 861-864.
28. Tanioka, Y., and Seno, T. (2001), Sediment effect on tsunami generation of the 1896 Sanriku tsunami earthquake, Geophysical Research Letters, 28(17), 3389-3392.
29. Titov, V. V., and Gonzalez, F. I. (1997), Implementation and testing of the Method of Splitting Tsunami (MOST) model, NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-112.
30. Ward, S. N. (1980), Relationships of tsunami generation and an earthquake source, J. Phys. Earth, 28, 441-474.
31. Wells, D. L. and Coppersmith, K. J. (1994), New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(4), 974-1002.
32. Yamashita, T. and Sato R. (1974), Generation of tsunami by a fault model, J. Phys. Earth, 22, 415-440.