Impact of systemic fungicides on lesions formed by inoculation with the bluestain fungus (ophiostoma minus) in loblolly pine (pinus taeda l.)

Arboriculture and Urban Forestry

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 288-292

  Doccola, Joseph J ^a   Strom, Brian L ^b   Brownie, Cavell ^c   Klepzig, Kier D ^d  

^a Arborjet Inc   (United States)

^b Southern Research Station   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Southern Research Station   (United States)

Author keywords

Dendroctonus frontalis; Propiconazole; Scolytidae; Southern Pine Beetle; Systemic Injection; Vascular Wilt

Indexed keywords

CONIFEROUS TREE; DISEASE CONTROL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FUNGAL DISEASE; FUNGICIDE; INOCULATION; LESION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

LOUISIANA; UNITED STATES;

COLEOPTERA; DENDROCTONUS FRONTALIS; FUNGI; HEXAPODA; OPHIOSTOMA; OPHIOSTOMA MINUS; PINUS TAEDA; SCOLYTINAE; ULMUS;

EID: 80855156873     PISSN: 02785226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Alamo Fungicide. Material Safety Data Sheet. Syngenta Crop Protec-tion. Canada, Inc.
2. Ayer, W.A., L.M. Browne, M.-C. Feng, H. Orzanska, and H. Sadeei-Ghomi. 1986. The chemistry of the blue stain fungi. Part 1. Some me-tabolites of Ceratocystis species associated with mountain pine beetle infected lodgepole pine. Canadian Journal of Chemistry 64:904-909.
3. Clarke, S.R., and J.T. Nowak. 2009. Revised. Southern pine beetle. For-est Insect & Disease Leaflet 49. US Department of Agriculture, For-est Service. Pacific Northwest Region (R6). Portland, Oregon. 8
4. Grosman, D.M., and W.W. Upton. 2006. Efficacy of systemic insecti-cides for protection of loblolly pine against southern pine engraver beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and wood borers (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 99(1):94-101. (Pubitemid 44616498)
5. Grosman, D.M., C.J. Fettig, C.L. Jorgensen, and A.S. Munson. 2010. Effectiveness of two systemic insecticides for protecting western conifers from mortality due to bark beetle attack. West. Journal of Applied Forestry 25(4):181-185.
6. Grosman, D.M., S.R. Clarke, and W.W. Upton. 2009. Efficacy of two systemic insecticides injected into loblolly pine for protection against southern pine bark beetles. Journal of Economic Entomology 102(3):1062-1069.
7. Haugen, L., and M. Stennes. 1999. Fungicide injection to control Dutch elm disease: understanding the options. Plant Diagnostics Quarterly 20(2):29-38.
8. Klepzig, K.D., and B.L. Strom. 2011. Effects of a commercial chitosan for-mulation on bark beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) resistance param-eters in loblolly pine. Journal of Entomological Science 46:124-134.
9. Klepzig, K.D., D.J. Robison, G. Fowler, P.R. Minchin, F.P. Hain, and H.L. Allen. 2005. Effects of mass inoculation on induced oleores-in response in intensively managed loblolly pine. Tree Physiology 25:681-688. (Pubitemid 40902403)
10. Klepzig, K.D., J.C. Moser, F.J. Lombardero, R.W. Hofstetter, and M.P. Ayres. 2001. Symbiosis and competition: Complex interactions among beetles, fungi, and mites. Symbiosis 30:83-96. (Pubitemid 32515799)
11. Mayfield, A.E., III, E.L. Barnard, J.A. Smith, S.C. Bernick, J.M. Eick-wort, and T.J. Dreaden. 2008. Effect of propiconazole on laurel wilt disease development in redbay trees and on the pathogen in vitro. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34(5):317-324.
12. Paine, T.D., K.F. Raffa, and T.C. Harrington. 1997. Interactions among scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers. Annual Review of Entomology 42:179-206.
13. Six, D.L., and M.J. Wingfield. 2011. The role of phytopathogenicity in bark beetle-fungus symbioses: A challenge to the classic paradigm. Annual Review of Entomology 56:255-272.
14. Wilson, A.D., and D.G. Lester. 1995. Evaluation of propiconazole ap-plication methods for control of oak wilt in Texas live oaks. F&N Tests 51:389.