Effects of voice harmonic complexity on ERP responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 122, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2408-2417

  Behroozmand, Roozbeh ^a   Korzyukov, Oleg ^a   Larson, Charles R ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustical complexity; Efference copies; Event related potentials (ERPs); Internal forward model; Pitch shift stimulus; Self vocalization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY FEEDBACK; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SOUND; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VOCALIZATION; VOICE;

ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PITCH PERCEPTION; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; VOICE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80855143626     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bauer J.J., Mittal J., Larson C.R., Hain T.C. Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 2006, 119:2363-2371.
2. Behroozmand R., Karvelis L., Liu H., Larson C.R. Vocalization-induced enhancement of the auditory cortex responsiveness during voice F0 feedback perturbation. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:1303-1312.
3. Bendor D., Wang X. The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex. Nature 2005, 436:1161-1165.
4. Blakemore S.J., Goodbody S.J., Wolpert D.M. Predicting the consequences of our own actions: the role of sensorimotor context estimation. J Neurosci 1998, 18:7511-7518.
5. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D., Frith C. Why can't you tickle yourself?. Neuroreport 2000, 11:R11-R16.
6. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat Neurosci 1998, 1:635-640.
7. Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int 2001, 5:341-345.
8. Burkard R.F., Don M., Eggermont J.J. Auditory evoked potentials: basic principles and clinical application 2006, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 1st ed.
9. Burnett T.A., Freedland M.B., Larson C.R., Hain T.C. Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. J Acoust Soc Am 1998, 103:3153-3161.
10. Chase R.A., Sutton S., First D., Zubin J. A developmental study of changes in behavior under delayed auditory feedback. J Genet Psychol 1961, 99:101-112.
11. Chen S.H., Liu H., Xu Y., Larson C.R. Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech. J Acoust Soc Am 2007, 121:1157-1163.
12. Cowie R.I., Douglas-Cowie E. Speech production in profound post-lingual deafness. Hearing science and hearing disorders 1983, Academic Press, New York. M.E. Luttman, M.P. Haggard (Eds.).
13. Davis P.J., Bartlett D.J., Luschei E.S. Coordination of the respiratory and laryngeal systems in breathing and vocalization. Vocal fold physiology frontiers in basic science 1993, 189-226. Singular, San Diego. I.R. Titze (Ed.).
14. Decety J. Neural representations for action. Rev Neurosci 1996, 7:285-297.
15. Donath T.M., Natke U., Kalveram K.T. Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables. J Acoust Soc Am 2002, 111:357-366.
16. Eliades S.J., Wang X. Sensory-motor interaction in the primate auditory cortex during self-initiated vocalizations. J Neurophysiol 2003, 89:2194-2207.
17. Eliades S.J., Wang X. Neural substrates of vocalization feedback monitoring in primate auditory cortex. Nature 2008, 453:1102-1106.
18. Hain T.C., Burnett T.A., Kiran S., Larson C.R., Singh S., Kenney M.K. Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex. Exp Brain Res 2000, 130:133-141.
19. Hari R., Aittoniemi K., Jarvinen M.L., Katila T., Varpula T. Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic-fields of the human-brain - localization of neural generators. Exp Brain Res 1980, 40:237-240.
20. Heinks-Maldonado T.H., Mathalon D.H., Gray M., Ford J.M. Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:180-190.
21. Heinks-Maldonado T.H., Nagarajan S.S., Houde J.F. Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production. Neuroreport 2006, 17:1375-1379.
22. Houde J.F., Jordan M.I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 1998, 279:1213-1216.
23. Houde J.F., Nagarajan S.S., Sekihara K., Merzenich M.M. Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: an MEG study. J Cognitive Neurosci 2002, 14:1125-1138.
24. Jeannerod M. The neural and behaviourial organisation of goal-directed movements 1988, Oxford Univ Press.
25. Jones J.A., Munhall K.G. Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation. J Acoust Soc Am 2000, 108:1246-1251.
26. Jurgens U. The neural control of vocalization in mammals: a review. J Voice 2008.
27. Kalinowski J., Armson J., Roland-Mieszkowski M., Stuart A., Gracco V.L. Effects of alterations in auditory feedback and speech rate on stuttering frequency. Lang Speech 1993, 36(Pt 1):1-16.
28. Kawahara H., Aikawa K. Contributions of auditory feedback frequency components on F0 fluctuations. J Acoust Soc Am 1996, 100:2825(A).
29. Kiran S., Larson C.R. Effect of duration of pitch-shifted feedback on vocal responses in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001, 44:975-987.
30. Larson C.R. On the relation of PAG neurons to laryngeal and respiratory muscles during vocalization in the monkey. Brain Res 1991, 552:77-86.
31. Larson C.R., Sun J., Hain T.C. Effects of simultaneous perturbations of voice pitch and loudness feedback on voice F0 and amplitude control. J Acoust Soc Am 2007, 121:2862-2872.
32. Liu H., Behroozmand R., Larson C.R. Enhanced neural responses to self-triggered voice pitch feedback perturbations. Neuroreport 2010, 21:527-531.
33. Ludlow C.L. Central nervous system control of the laryngeal muscles in humans. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2005, 147:205-222.
34. Maidhof C., Vavatzanidis N., Prinz W., Rieger M., Koelsch S. Processing expectancy violations during music performance and perception: an ERP study. J Cognitive Neurosci 2010, 22:2401-2413.
35. Müller-Preuss P., Newman J.D., Jürgens U. Anatomical and physiological evidence for a relationship between the 'cingular' vocalization area and the auditory cortex in the squirrel monkey. Brain Res 1980, 202:307-315.
36. Muller-Preuss P., Ploog D. Inhibition of auditory cortical neurons during phonation. Brain Res 1981, 215:61-76.
37. Munhall K.G., MacDonald E.N., Byrne S.K., Johnsrude I.S. Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not do compensate. J Acoust Soc Am 2009, 125:384-390.
38. Naatanen R., Kujala T., Winkler I. Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: a unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology 2010.
39. Naatanen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:375-425.
40. Natke U., Grosser J., Sandrieser P., Kalveram K.T. The duration component of the stress effect in stuttering. J Fluency Disord 2002, 27:305-317. Quiz 18.
41. Oostenveld R., Praamstra P. The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 112:713-719.
42. Purcell D.W., Munhall K.G. Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 2006, 119:2288-2297.
43. Russo N., Larson C., Kraus N. Audio-vocal system regulation in children with autism spectrum disorders. Exp Brain Res 2008, 188:111-124.
44. Sadagopan S., Wang X. Nonlinear spectrotemporal interactions underlying selectivity for complex sounds in auditory cortex. J Neurosci 2009, 29:11192-11202.
45. Sivasankar M., Bauer J.J., Babu T., Larson C.R. Voice responses to changes in pitch of voice or tone auditory feedback. J Acoust Soc Am 2005, 117:850-857.
46. Sperry R. Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1950, 43:482-489.
47. Stufflebeam S.M., Poeppel D., Rowley H.A., Roberts T.P. Peri-threshold encoding of stimulus frequency and intensity in the M100 latency. Neuroreport 1998, 9:91-94.
48. Tervaniemi M., Ilvonen T., Sinkkonen J., Kujala A., Alho K., Huotilainen M., et al. Harmonic partials facilitate pitch discrimination in humans: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Neurosci Lett 2000, 279:29-32.
49. Tervaniemi M., Schroger E., Saher M., Naatanen R. Effects of spectral complexity and sound duration on automatic complex-sound pitch processing in humans - a mismatch negativity study. Neurosci Lett 2000, 290:66-70.
50. Titze I.R. Principles of voice production 1994, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
51. von Helmholtz H. Handbook of physiological optics 1867, Voss, Hamburg. 1 ed.
52. von Holst E. Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organ. Br J Anim Behav 1954, 2:89-94.
53. Winkler I., Denham S.L., Nelken I. Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends Cognitive Sci 2009, 13:532-540.
54. Winkler I., Tervaniemi M., Naatanen R. Two separate codes for missing-fundamental pitch in the human auditory cortex. J Acoust Soc Am 1997, 102:1072-1082.
55. Wolpert D. Computational approaches tomotor control. Trends Cognitive Sci 1997, 1:209-216.
56. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995, 269:1880-1882.
57. Xu Y., Larson C., Bauer J., Hain T. Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences. J Acoust Soc Am 2004, 116:1168-1178.