Cumulative wavefront reconstructor for the Shack-Hartmann sensor

Inverse Problems and Imaging

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 893-913

  Zhariy, Mariya ^a   Neubauer, Andreas ^a   Rosensteiner, Matthias ^b   Ramlau, Ronny ^a  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

^b MathConsult GmbH   (Austria)

Author keywords

Adaptive optics; Cumulative wavefront reconstructor; Inverse problems

Indexed keywords

EID: 80855141592     PISSN: 19308337     EISSN: 19308345     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3934/ipi.2011.5.893     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. J. M. Beckers, Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch with multi-conjugate adaptive optics, in \Proc. European Southern Observatory Conf. and Workshop on Very Large Telescopes and Their Instrumentation (ed. M. H. Ulrich), Vol. 30, (1988), 693-703.
2. M. A. Davison, The ill-conditioned nature of the limited angle tomography problem, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 43 (1983), 428-448.
3. B. L. Ellerbroek, Ecient computation of minimum-variance wave-front reconstructors with sparse matrix techniques, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 19 (2002), 1803-1816.
4. B. L. Ellerbroek and C. R. Vogel, Simulations of closed-loop wavefront reconstruction for multiconjugate adaptive optics on giant telescopes, in \Proc. SPIE vol 5169-23, Adaptive Optics System Technologies 2, (2003), 206-217.
5. B. L. Ellerbroek and C. R. Vogel, Inverse problems in astronomical adaptive optics, Inverse Problems, 25 (2009), 063001, 37 pp.
6. H. Engl, M. Hanke and A. Neubauer, Regularization of Inverse Problems, Mathematics and its Applications, 375, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1996.
7. D. L. Fried, Least-square _tting a wave-front distortion estimate to an array of phase- di_erence measurements, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 67 (1977), 370-375.
8. L. Gilles, Order N sparse minimum-variance open-loop reconstructor for extreme adaptive optics, Opt. Lett., 28 (2003), 1927-1929.
9. L. Gilles, Closed-loop stability and performance analysis of least-squares and minimum-variance control algorithms for multi-conjugate adaptive optics, Appl. Opt., 44 (2004), 993-1002.
10. L. Gilles, C. R. Vogel and B. L. Ellebroek, Multigrid preconditioned conjugate-gradient method for large-scale wave-front reconstruction, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 19 (2002), 1817-1822.
11. J. Herrmann, Least-squares wave front errors of minimum norm, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 70 (1980), 28-35.
12. A. Neubauer, On the ill-posedness and convergence of the Shack-Hartmann based wavefront reconstruction, J. Inv. Ill-Posed Problems, 18 (2010), 551-576.
13. L. A. Poyneer, D. T. Gavel and J. M. Brase, Fast wave-front reconstruction in large adaptive optics systems with use of the Fourier transform, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 19 (2002), 2100-2111.
14. L. A. Poyneer and J.-P. V-eran, Optimal modal Fourier transform wave-front control, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 22 (2005), 1515-1526.
15. F. Roddier, "Adaptive Optics in Astronomy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 1999.
16. M. C. Roggemann and B.M. Welsh, "Imaging Through Turbulence, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1996.
17. E. Thi-ebaut and M. Tallon, Fast minimum variance wavefront reconstruction for extremely large telescopes, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 27 (2010), 1046-1059.
18. C. R. Vogel and Q. Yang, Multigrid algorithm for least-squares wavefront reconstruction, Applied Optics, 45 (2006), 705-715.
19. Q. Yang, C. R. Vogel and B. L. Ellerbroek, Fourier domain preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm for atmospheric tomography, Applied Optics, 45 (2006), 5281-5293.