Diversification of Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) in the California Floristic province

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 172, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1137-1164

  Burge, Dylan O ^a,h   Erwin, Diane M ^b   Islam, Melissa B ^c,d   Kellermann, Jürgen ^e,f   Kembel, Steven W ^b,i   Wilken, Dieter H ^g   Manos, Paul S ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d Denver Botanic Gardens   (United States)

^e State Herbarium of South Australia   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^g SANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

^h ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS AND DOMAIN TRUST   (Australia)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Ceanothus; Divergence time; Fossil; Nitrate reductase; Rbcl; TrnL F

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; DIVERGENCE; ENDEMISM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FOSSIL RECORD; GENETIC ANALYSIS; PALEOECOLOGY; PALEOENVIRONMENT; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; QUATERNARY; SHRUB; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

CEANOTHUS; CERASTES; RHAMNACEAE;

EID: 80855139805     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/662028     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Aageson L, D Medan, J Kellermann, HH Hilger 2005 Phylogeny of the tribe Colletieae (Rhamnaceae): a sensitivity analysis of the plastid region trnL-trnF combined with morphology. Plant Syst Evol 250:197-214.
2. Ackerly DD 2004 Adaptation, niche conservatism, and convergence: comparative studies of leaf evolution in the California chaparral. Am Nat 163:654-671.
3. Ackerly DD 2009 Evolution, origin and age of lineages in the Californian and Mediterranean floras. J Biogeogr 36:1221-1233.
4. Ackerly DD, DW Schwilk, CO Webb 2006 Niche evolution and adaptive radiation: testing the order of trait divergence. Ecology 87: S50-S61.
5. Argus DF, RG Gordon 2001 Present tectonic motion across the Coast Ranges and San Andreas fault system in central California. Geol Soc Am Bull 113:1580-1592.
6. Axelrod DI 1948 Climate and evolution in western North America during middle Pliocene time. Evolution 2:127-144.
7. Axelrod DI 1950 The Anaverde flora of southern California. Carnegie Inst Wash Publ 590:119-158.
8. Axelrod DI 1958 Evolution of the Madro-Tertiary geoflora. Bot Rev 24: 433-509.
9. Axelrod DI 1966 The Pleistocene Soboba flora of southern California. University of California Publications in Geological Science, no. 60. University of California, Berkeley.
10. Axelrod DI 1973 History of the Mediterranean ecosystem in California. Pages 225-277 in F di Castri, HA Mooney, eds. Mediterranean ecosystems: origin and structure. Springer, New York.
11. Axelrod DI 1975 Evolution and biogeography of Madrean-Tethyan sclerophyll vegetation. Ann Mo Bot Gard 62:280-334.
12. Axelrod DI 1977 Outline history of California vegetation. Pages 139-193 in MG Barbour, J Major, eds. Terrestrial vegetation of California. Wiley, New York.
13. Axelrod DI 1989 Age and origin of chaparral. Pages 7-19 in SC Keeley, ed. The California chaparral: paradigms re-examined. Science Series no. 34. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles.
14. Baddeley A, R Turner 2005 spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J Stat Softw 12(6).
15. Barbour MG, AF Johnson 1988 Beach and dune. Pages 223-261 in MG Barbour, J Major, eds. Terrestrial vegetation of California. Special Publication 9. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento.
16. Bell CD, DE Soltis, PS Soltis 2010 The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-visited. Am J Bot 97:1296-1303.
17. Bergsten J 2005 A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics 21: 163-193.
18. Blattner FR 1999 Direct amplification of the entire ITS region from poorly preserved plant material using recombinant PCR. Biotechniques 27:1180-1185.
19. Bolmgren K, B Oxelman 2004 Generic limits in Rhamnus L. s.l. (Rhamnaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence phylogenies. Taxon 53:383-390.
20. Breckon GJ, MG Barbour 1974 Review of North American Pacific Coast beach vegetation. Madroño 22:333-360.
21. Bruen TC, H Philippe, D Bryant 2006 A simple and robust statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination. Genetics 172: 2665-2681.
22. Bryant D, V Moulton 2004 Neighbor-net: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Mol Biol Evol 21: 255-265.
23. Burge DO, WR Barker 2010 Evolution of nickel hyperaccumulation by Stackhousia tryonii (Celastraceae), a serpentinite-endemic plant from Queensland, Australia. Aust Syst Bot 23:415-430.
24. Burge DO, SR Manchester 2008 Fruit morphology, fossil history, and biogeography of Paliurus (Rhamnaceae). Int J Plant Sci 169: 1066-1085.
25. Burge DO, PS Manos 2011 Edaphic ecology and genetics of the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae). Madroño 58:1-21.
26. Calsbeek R, JN Thompson, JE Richardson 2003 Patterns of molecular evolution and diversification in a biodiversity hotspot: the California Floristic Province. Mol Ecol 12:1021-1029.
27. Chappell J 1978 Theories of upper Quaternary ice ages. Pages 211-225 in AB Pittock, LA Frakes, D Jenssen, eds. Climatic change and variability, a southern perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28. Clement M, D Posada, KA Crandall 2000 TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657-1660.
29. Correa E, C Jaramillo, S Manchester, M Gutierrez 2010 A fruit and leaves of Rhamnaceae affinities from the late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of Colombia. Am J Bot 97:71-79.
30. Davis SD, AM Helms, MS Heffner, AR Shaver, AC Deroulet, NL Stasiak, SM Vaughn, CB Leake, HD Lee, ET Sayegh 2007 Chaparral zonation in the Santa Monica Mountains: the influence of freezing temperatures. Fremontia 35:12-15.
31. Drummond AJ, SYW Ho, MJ Phillips, A Rambaut 2006 Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol 4:699-710.
32. Drummond AJ, A Rambaut 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 7:214.
33. Edgar RC 2004 MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792-1797.
34. Ewers FW, MC Lawson, TJ Bowen, SD Davis 2003 Freeze/thaw stress in Ceanothus of southern California chaparral. Oecologia 136:213-219.
35. Farris JS, M Källersjö, AG Kluge, C Bult 1995 Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
36. Fay MF, C Bayer, WS Alverson, AY de Bruijn, MW Chase 1998 Plastid rbcL sequence data indicates a close affinity between Diegodendron and Bixa. Taxon 47:43-50.
37. Fay MF, MD Lledó, JE Richardson, BL Rye, SD Hopper 2001 Molecular data confirm the affinities of south-west Australian endemic Granitites with Alphitonia (Rhamnaceae). Kew Bull 56: 669-675.
38. Felsenstein J 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
39. Fisk LH, JA Myers 2008 Fossil plant remains from the Antelope Valley landfill near Palmdale, California. Report prepared for Paleo Environmental Associates, Altadena, CA.
40. Forest F, R Grenyer, M Rouget, TJ Davies, RM Cowling, DP Faith, A Balmford, et al 2007 Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 445:757-760.
41. Franklin JF, CB Halpern, B Smith, TB Thomas 1985 The importance of Ceanothus species in U.S. forest ecosystems. Part 2. Pages 2-15 in Proceedings of the workshop The Role of the Genus Ceanothus in Western Forest Ecosystems, November 22-24, 1982, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. General Technical Report PNW-182. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR.
42. Fross D, D Wilken 2006 Ceanothus. Timber, Portland, OR.
43. Graham A 1999 Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic history of North American vegetation, north of Mexico. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
44. Hall TA 1999 BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95-98.
45. Hardig TM, PS Soltis, DE Soltis 2000 Diversification of the North American shrub genus Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae): conflicting phylogenies from nuclear ribosomal DNA and chloroplast DNA. Am J Bot 87:108-123.
46. Hardig TM, PS Soltis, DE Soltis, RB Hudson 2002 Morphological and molecular analysis of putative hybrid speciation in Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae). Syst Bot 27:734-746.
47. Hein J 1990 Reconstructing evolution of sequences subject to recombination using parsimony. Math Biosci 98:185-200.
48. Henry CD 2009 Uplift of the Sierra Nevada, California. Geology 37: 575-576.
49. Herbert TD, JD Schuffert, D Andreasen, L Heusser, M Lyle, A Mix, AC Ravelo, LD Stott, JC Herguera 2001 Collapse of the California Current during glacial maxima linked to climate change on land. Science 293:71-76.
50. Hickey BM 1979 The California current system: hypotheses and facts. Prog Oceanogr 8:191-279.
51. Hijmans RJ, SE Cameron, JL Parra, PG Jones, AJ Jarvis 2005 Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965-1978.
52. Ho SYW, MJ Phillips 2009 Accounting for calibration uncertainty in phylogenetic estimation of evolutionary divergence times. Syst Biol 58:367-380.
53. Howarth DG, DA Baum 2002 Phylogenetic utility of a nuclear intron from nitrate reductase for the study of closely related plant species. Mol Phylogenet Evol 23:525-528.
54. Huber NK 1981 Amount and timing of late Cenozoic uplift and tilt of the central Sierra Nevada, California: evidence from the upper San Joaquin River basin. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1197. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
55. Huson DH, D Bryant 2006 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23:254-267.
56. Huyer A 1983 Coastal upwelling in the California Current system. Prog Oceanogr 12:259-284.
57. Islam ME, MP Simmons 2006 A thorny dilemma: testing alternative intrageneric classifications within Ziziphus (Rhamnacae). Syst Bot 31:826-842.
58. Jeong S-C, A Liston, DD Myrold 1997 Molecular phylogeny of the genus Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) using rbcL and ndhF sequences. Theor Appl Genet 94:852-857.
59. Katoh K, K Misawa, K Kuma, T Miyata 2002 MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059-3066.
60. Katoh K, H Toh 2008 Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief Bioinform 9:286-298.
61. Kay KM, JB Whittall, SA Hodges 2006 A survey of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer substitution rates across angiosperms: an approximate molecular clock with life history effects. BMC Evol Biol 6:36.
62. Keeley JE 1975 Longevity of nonsprouting Ceanothus. Am Midl Nat 93:504-507.
63. Keeley JE 1987 Role of fire in seed germination of woody taxa in California chaparral. Ecology 68:434-443.
64. Kellermann J 2002 The Australian Rhamnaceae: a preliminary molecular analysis. Aust Syst Bot Soc Newsl 110:2-4, 111:5 (addendum).
65. Kellermann J, F Udovicic 2007 Large indels obscure phylogeny in analysis of chloroplast DNA (trnL-F) sequence data: Pomaderreae (Rhamnaceae) revisited. Telopea 12:1-22.
66. Kellermann J, F Udovicic, PY Ladiges 2005 Phylogenetic analysis and generic limits of the tribe Pomaderreae (Rhamnaceae) using internal transcribed spacer DNA sequences. Taxon 54:619-631.
67. Kesseli JE 1942 The climates of California according to the Köppen classification. Geogr Rev 32:476-480.
68. Kruckeberg A 1984 California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, soils, and management problems. University of California Publications in Botany no. 78. University of California, Berkeley.
69. Lewin-Koh NJ, R Bivand 2010 Maptools: tools for reading and handling spatial objects. Version 0.7-37. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/maptools/index.html.
70. Maddison WP, LL Knowles 2006 Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst Biol 55:21-30.
71. Mason HL 1942 Distributional history and fossil record of Ceanothus. Pages 281-303 in M Van Rensselaer, HE McMinn, eds. Ceanothus. Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, Santa Barbara, CA.
72. McGuire G, F Wright 2000 TOPAL 2.0: improved detection of mosaic sequences within multiple alignments. Bioinformatics 16:130-134.
73. McGuire G, F Wright, MJ Prentice 1997 A graphical method for detecting recombination in phylogenetic datasets. Mol Biol Evol 14: 1125-1131.
74. McMinn HE 1942 A systematic study of the genus Ceanothus. Pages 131-279 in M Van Rensselaer, HE McMinn, eds. Ceanothus. Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, Santa Barbara, CA.
75. McMinn HE 1944 The importance of field hybrids in determining species in the genus Ceanothus. Proc Calif Acad Sci, ser 4, 25:323-356.
76. Milne I, D Linder, M Bayer, D Husmeier, G McGuire, DF Marshall, F Wright 2009 TOPALi v2: a rich graphical interface for evolutionary analysis of multiple alignments on HPC clusters and multi-core desktops. Bioinformatics 25:126-127.
77. Mix HT, A Mulch, ML Kent-Corson, CP Chamberlain 2011 Cenozoic migration of topography in the North American Cordillera. Geology 39:87-90.
78. Mulch A, AM Sarna-Wojcicki, ME Perkins, CP Chamberlain 2008 A Miocene to Pleistocene climate and elevation record of the Sierra Nevada (California). Proc Calif Acad Sci 105:6819-6824.
79. Münchow A 2000 Wind stress curl forcing of the coastal ocean near Point Conception, California. J Phys Oceanogr 6:1265-1280.
80. Myers N, RA Mittermeier, CG Mittermeier, GAB da Fonseca, J Kent 2000 Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853-858.
81. Namson JS, TL Davis 1988 Seismically active fold and thrust belt in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Geol Soc Am Bull 100: 257-273.
82. Nobs MA 1963 Experimental studies on species relationships in Ceanothus. Monograph Series, no. 623. Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC.
83. Nylander JAA 2004 MrModeltest, version 2. Distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden.
84. Page BM 1981 The southern Coast Ranges. Pages 329-417 in WG Ernst, ed. The geotectonic development of California (Rubey Vol 1). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
85. Page BM, GA Thompson, RG Coleman 1998 Late Cenozoic tectonics of the central and southern Coast Ranges of California. Geol Soc Am Bull 7:846-876.
86. Pamilo P, M Nei 1988 Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol Biol Evol 5:568-583.
87. Parry CC 1889 Ceanothus, L.: a synoptical list, comprising thirtythree species, with notes and descriptions. Proc Davenport Acad Sci 5:162-174.
88. Peinado M, MA Macías, JL Aguirre, J Delgadillo 2009 A phytogeographical classification of the North American Pacific coast based on climate, vegetation and a floristic analysis of vascular plants. J Bot 389414, doi:10.1155/2009/389414.
89. Posada D, KA Crandall 1998 Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
90. PRISM Climate Group 2006 United States average monthly or annual precipitation, 1971-2000, raster digital data. PRISM Climate Group, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu.
91. R Development Core Team 2010 R: a language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.10.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org.
92. Rambaut A, AJ Drummond 2007 Tracer, version 1.5. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer.
93. Raven PH 1973 The evolution of Mediterranean floras. Pages 213-224 in F di Castri, HA Mooney, eds. Mediterranean ecosystems: origin and structure. Springer, New York.
94. Raven PH, DI Axelrod 1978 Origin and relationships of the California flora. University of California Press, Berkeley.
95. Richardson JE, LW Chatrou, JB Mols, RHJ Erkens, MD Pirie 2004 Historical biogeography of two cosmopolitan families of flowering plants: Annonaceae and Rhamnaceae. Philos Trans R Soc B 359: 1495-1508.
96. Richardson JE, MF Fay, QBC Cronk, D Bowman, MW Chase 2000a A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using rbcL and trnL-F plastid DNA sequences. Am J Bot 87:1309-1324.
97. Richardson JE, MF Fay, QCB Cronk, MW Chase 2000b A revision of the tribal classification of Rhamnaceae. Kew Bull 55:311-340.
98. Richardson JE, FM Weitz, MF Fay, QCB Cronk, HP Linder, G Reeves, MW Chase 2001 Phylogenetic analysis of Phylica L. (Rhamnaceae) with an emphasis on island species: evidence from plastid trnL-F and nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ribosomal) DNA sequences. Taxon 50:405-427.
99. Ronquist F, JP Huelsenbeck 2003 MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
100. Russell RJ 1926 Climates of California. University of California Publications in Geological Science, vol 2, no. 4. University of California, Berkeley.
101. Schorn HE, JA Myers, DM Erwin 2007 Navigating the Neogene: an updated chronology of Neogene paleofloras from the western United States. Cour Forschungsinst Senckenb 258:139-146.
102. Smith SA, JM Beaulieu, MJ Donoghue 2010 An uncorrelated relaxed-clock analysis suggests an earlier origin of flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5897-5902.
103. Stebbins GL 1978a Why are there so many rare plants in California? I. Environmental factors. Fremontia 5:6-10.
104. Stebbins GL 1978b Why are there so many rare plants in California? II. Youth and area of species. Fremontia 6:17-20.
105. Stebbins GL, J Major 1965 Endemism and speciation in the California flora. Ecol Monogr 35:1-36.
106. Swofford DL 2000 PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
107. Taberlet P, G Ludovic, G Pautou, J Bouvet 1991 Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol 17:1105-1109.
108. Templeton AR, KA Crandall, CF Sing 1992 A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619-633.
109. Thulin M, B Bremer, J Richardson, J Niklasson, MF Fay, MW Chase 1998 Family relationships of the enigmatic rosid genera Barbeya and Dirachma from the Horn of Africa region. Plant Syst Evol 213:103-119.
110. Valentine JW 1966 Numerical analysis of marine molluscan ranges on the extratropical northeastern Pacific Shelf. Limnol Oceanogr 11:198-211.
111. Valiente-Banuet A, N Flores-Hernández, M Verdú, P Dávila 1998 The chaparral vegetation in Mexico under nonmediterranean climate: the convergence and Madrean-Tethyan hypotheses reconsidered. Am J Bot 85:1398-1408.
112. Wakabayashi J 1999 Distribution of displacement on and evolution of a young transform fault system: the northern San Andreas fault system, California. Tectonics 18:1245-1274.
113. Wakabayashi J, TL Sawyer 2001 Stream incision, tectonics, uplift, and evolution of topography of the Sierra Nevada, California. J Geol 109:539-562.
114. Wells PE 1969 The relation between mode of reproduction and extent of speciation in woody genera of the California chaparral. Evolution 23:264-267.
115. Wernicke B, R Clayton, M Ducea, CH Jones, S Park, S Ruppert, J Saleeby, et al 1996 Origin of high mountains in the continents: the southern Sierra Nevada. Science 271:190-193.
116. White TJ, T Bruns, S Lee, J Taylor 1990 Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pages 315-322 in MA Innis, DH Gelfand, JJ Sninsky, TJ White, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
117. Wikström N, V Savolainen, MW Chase 2001 Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc R Soc B 268:2211-2220.
118. Zurawski G, MT Clegg 1987 Evolution of higher-plant chloroplast DNA-encoded genes: implications for structure-function and phylogenetic studies. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 38:391-418.
119. Zwickl DJ 2006 Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. PhD diss. University of Texas, Austin.