What can topology changes in the oddball N2 reveal about underlying processes?

NeuroReport

Volumn 22, Issue 17, 2011, Pages 870-874

  Warren, Christopher M ^a   Tanaka, James W ^a   Holroyd, Clay B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

anterior cingulate cortex; conflict monitoring; conflict N2; event related potentials; fusiform gyrus; locus coeruleus; N2; N250; norepinephrine; oddball N2

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; NORADRENERGIC SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; ODDBALL N2; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP; SCALP DISTRIBUTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CEREBRAL CORTEX; COGNITION; COLOR VISION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOREPINEPHRINE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80855139662     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834bbe1f     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Pritchard WS, Shappell SA, Brandt ME. Psychophysiology of N200/N400: A review and classification scheme. In: Jennings JR, Ackles PK, editors. Advances in psychophysiology: A research annual. Vol 4: London: Jessica Kingsley; 1991. pp. 43-106.
2. Folstein JR, Van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology 2007; 45:152-170.
3. Eriksen B, Eriksen C. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 1974; 16:143-149.
4. Ritter W, Simson R, Vaughan HG, Friedman D. A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. Science 1979; 203:1358-1361. (Pubitemid 9150872)
5. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Van den Wildenberg W, Ridderinkhof KR. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2003; 3:17-26. (Pubitemid 37517032)
6. Holroyd CB, Pakzad-Vaezi KL, Krigolson OE. The feedback correct-related positivity: Sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback. Psychophysiology 2008; 45:688-697.
7. Holroyd CB. A note about the oddball N200 and the feedback ERN. In: Ullsperger M, Falkenstein M, editors. Errors, conflicts, and the brain: Current opinions on performance monitoring. Leipzig: MPI of Cognitive Neuroscience; 2004. pp. 211-218.
8. Yeung N, Botvinick MM, Cohen JD. The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 2004; 111:931-959. (Pubitemid 39375082)
9. Botvinick M, Braver T, Barch D, Carter C, Cohen J. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 2001; 108:624-652. (Pubitemid 33604139)
10. Braver TS, Barch DM, Gray JR, Molfese DL, Snyder A. Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition, and errors. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11:825-836. (Pubitemid 32800550)
11. Botvinick M, Nystrom LE, Fissell K, Carter CS, Cohen JD. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 1999; 402:179-181.
12. Mathalon DH, Whitfield SL, Ford JM. Anatomy of an error: ERP and fMRI. Biol Psychol 2003; 64:119-141. (Pubitemid 37351019)
13. Tanaka JW, Curran T, Porterfield AL, Collins D. Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. J Cogni Neurosci 2006; 18:1488-1497. (Pubitemid 44511747)
14. Gratton G, Coles M, Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55:468-484. (Pubitemid 13112654)
15. Hillyard SA, Squires KC, Bauer JW, Lindsay PH. Evoked potential correlates of auditory signal detection. Science 1971; 172:1357-1360.
16. Donchin E. Average evoked potentials and uncertainty resolution. Psychon Sci 1968; 12:103.
17. Luck SJ. An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2005.
18. Berridge CW,Waterhouse BD. The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: Modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Res Rev 2003; 42:33-84. (Pubitemid 36369264)
19. Servan-Schreiber D, Printz H, Cohen JD. A network model of catecholamine effects: Gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and behavior. Science 1990; 249:892-895.
20. Nieuwenhuis S, Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD. Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychol Bull 2005; 131:510-532. (Pubitemid 41168494)
21. Nieuwenhuis S, de Geus EJ, Aston-Jones G. The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology 2011; 48:162-175.
22. Duncan-Johnson C, Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 1977; 14:456-467. (Pubitemid 8190202)