Possibilities Without Possible Worlds/Histories

Journal of Philosophical Logic

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 737-765

  Placek, Tomasz ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Branching space times; Modalities; Tense logic

Indexed keywords

EID: 80855139040     PISSN: 00223611     EISSN: 15730433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10992-010-9159-x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Belnap, N. (1992). Branching space-time. Synthese, 92, 385-434. 'Postprint' archived at http://philsci-archive. pitt. edu/archive/00001003.
2. Belnap, N. (2001). Double time references: Speech-act reports as modalities in an indeterminist setting. In F. Wolter, H. Wansing, M. de Rijke, & M. Zakharyaschev (Eds.), Advances in modal logic (Vol. 3, pp. 1-21).
3. Belnap, N. (2002). EPR-like "funny business" in the theory of branching space-times. In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (Eds.), Nonlocality and modality. NATO science series (pp. 293-315). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Belnap, N. (2005a). Agents and agency in branching space-times. In D. Vanderveken (Ed.), Logic, thought, and action (pp. 291-313). Springer.
5. Belnap, N. (2005b). A theory of causation: causae causantes (originating causes) as inus conditions in branching space-times. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56, 221-253.
6. Belnap, N. (2007). An indeterminist view on the parameters of truth. In T. Müller (Ed.), Philosophie der Zeit (pp. 87-113). Frankfurt: Klostermann.
7. Belnap, N., Perloff, M., & Xu, M. (2001). Facing the future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Kowalski, T., & Placek, T. (1999). Outcomes in branching space-time and GHZ-Bell theorems. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50, 349-375.
9. Müller, T. (2002). Branching space-time, modal logic and the counterfactual conditional. In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (Eds.), Nonlocality and modality. NATO science series (pp. 273-291). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Müller, T. (2005). Probability theory and causation: A branching space-times analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56(3), 487-520.
11. Müller, T. (2010), Towards a theory of limited indeterminism in branching space-times. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 39(4), 395-423.
12. Müller, T., Belnap, N., & Kishida, K. (2008). Funny business in branching space-times: Infinite modal correlations. Synthese, 164(1), 141-159.
13. Øhrstrøm, P., & Hasle, P. F. V. (1995). Temporal logic: From ancient ideas to artificial intelligence. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
14. Placek, T., & Wroński, L. (2009). On infinite EPR-like correlations. Synthese, 167(1), 1-32.
15. Prior, A. (1967). Past, present, and future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Thomason, R. H. (1970). Indeterminist time and truth-value gaps. Theoria, 36(3), 264-281.
17. von Kutschera, F. (1986). Zwei Modallogische Argumente für den Determinismus: Aristoteles und Diodor. Erkenntnis, 24, 203-217.
18. Weiner, M., & Belnap, N. (2006). How causal probabilities might fit into our objectively indeterministic world. Synthese, 149(1), 1-36.
19. Wroński, L., & Placek, T. (2009). On Minkowskian branching structures. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40, 251-258.