Telecommunications (interception and access) and its regulation in Arab countries

Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 225-239

  Kisswani, Nazzal M ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80855132974     PISSN: 19018401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Ian Walden and John Angel, Telecommunications Law Regulation (2 ed, 2005)
2. Whitefield Diffie and Susan Landau, Privacy on the Line(1998)
3. Newton H,'Newton's Telecom Dictionary: The Official Dictionary of Telecommunication'. (1998)New York: Flatiron Pub
4. Sharon O'Neil and Donna Everett, Telecommunications/Networking Information System Curriculum (1998)ERIC http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED299427&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED299427 at 20 February 2009
5. Gabriele Balbi, 'Studying the Social History of Telecommunications between Anglophone and Continental Traditions' (2009)15(15) Media History 85.
6. Richard Posner, 'Antitrust in the New Economy' (2001) 68 Antitrust Law Journal 925
7. Yochai Benkler, 'Overcoming Agoraphobia: Building the Commons of the Digitally Networked Environment ' (1999) 11(2 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 286.
8. Rupert Thorogood and Charles Brookson, Lawful Interception (2007) Telektronikk http://www.telenor.com/telektronikk/volumes/pdf/2.2007/Page_033-036.pdf at 10 Augest 2008
9. Jack Straw, ' Interception of Communications in the United Kingdom: A Consultation Paper' (Home office, 1999)
10. CALEA, AskCALEA- Frequently Asked Questions (2003) Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act www.askcalea.net/fags.html at 10 March 2009
11. European Council Resolution, January 1995,JAI42 Rev 28197/2/95, published in the Official Journal reference 96C 329/01, 4 November 1996
12. Rupert Thorogood and Charles Brookson, Lawful Interception (2007) Telektronikk http://www.telenor.com/telektronikk/volumes/pdf/2.2007/Page_033-036.pdf at 10 Augest 2008
13. Gerhard Schmid 'on the draft Council Resolution on the lawful interception of telecommunications in relation new technologies' (1999)
14. Rupert Thorogood and Charles Brookson, Lawful Interception (2007) Telektronikk http://www.telenor.com/telektronikk/volumes/pdf/2.2007/Page_033-036.pdf at 10 Augest 2008
15. Lawful Interception http://www.retentia.com/interception.htm 5 February 2009
16. Australian Commonwealth Parliamentary Library, Telecommunication Legislation Amendment Bill (1997) http//www.aph.gov.au/pubs/1997-1998/98bd067/htm at 28 October 2008
17. Philip Branch, 'Lawful Interception of the Internet' (2003) 1(1) Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and society 38
18. Kevin Many, Bin Laden's message could be hiding in plain sight (2001) http://www.ustoday.com/columnist/2001/12/19/many/htm at 3 February 2009
19. Tim Ehrlich, Case study of lawful Intercept (2004) Harvard Law school http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globaleconomy/lawful_intercept.pdf at Febraury 2009
20. Newport Networks, Lawful Interception Overview (2008) Newport Networks http://www.newport-networks.com/custdocs/87-Lawful-Intercept.pdf at 5 February 2009
21. Micah Sherr et al, 'Singling Vulnerabilities in Wiretapping System' (2005) 3(6) IEEE security & privacy 13
22. Bert-Jaap Koops and Rudi Bekkers, 'Interceptability of Telecommunication is US and Dutch Law Prepared for the Future?' (2007) 31(31) Telecommunication Policy 45
23. Jim X Dempsey, CDT's Analysis of S. 2092: Amending the Pen Register and Trap and Trace Statute in Response to Recent Internet Denial of Service Attacks and to Establish Meaningful Privacy Protections, Centre for Democracy & Technology, Security & Privacy http://www.cdt.org/security/000404amending.shtm at 10 March 2009
24. Tim Ehrlich, Case study of lawful Intercept (2004) Harvard Law school http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globaleconomy/lawful_intercept.pdf at Febraury 2009
25. Philip Branch, 'Lawful Interception of the Internet' (2003) 1(1) Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and society 38
26. Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438-457 (1928)
27. Andro Milanović et al, 'Method for Lawful Interception in IP Telephony Network Based on H.323' (2003) 1 IEEE Computer society
28. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 'Implementation of Section 104 of the Communication Assistance for law Enforcement Act' (1998) 63(48) Federal Register
29. Tim Ehrlich, Case study of lawful Intercept (2004) Harvard Law school http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/globaleconomy/lawful_intercept.pdf at Febraury 2009
30. Balamurugan Karpagavinayagam, Redu state and Olivier Festor, 'Monitoring Architecture for Lawful interception in VoIP Network' (Paper presented at the the Second International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection-ICIMP, 1-5 2007)
31. Jari Raman, 'Building Lawful Interception Capabilities: Need for Legal Safeguards' (2009) 2(3) International Journal of Private Law 305
32. Thomas Wong, 'Regulation of Interception of Communications in Selected Jurisdictions' (2005) Research and Library Services Division Legislative Council Secretariat,Hong Kong
33. Susan Landau, Security, Liberty, and Electronic Communication' (Invited talk) in Matt Franklin(ed) Advances in Cryptology: CRYPTO (2004) Springer Verlag http://www.springerlink.com/content/69nnwc07dqq48xvb/ at 5 April 2009
34. Mathieu Gorge, 'Lawful Interception - Key Concept, Actors, Trends and Best Practice Considerations' (2007) 2007(9) Computer fraud & Security 10
35. Ebrahim Nasab and Majid Aghaei, 'The Effect of ICT on Economic Growth: Further Evidence' (2009) 5 International Bulletin of Business Administration
36. Arab Technology (2008) http://www.madarresearch.com/news/newsdetail at 10 September 2009
37. Mudiarasan Kuppusamy and Solucis Santhapparaj,'Cyber- Law in the New Economic: The Case of Malaysia'(2006) 5(8) Asian Journal of Information Technology
38. Ebrahim Nasab and Majid Aghaei,(2009) 'The Effect of ICT on Economic Growth: Further Evidence' 5 International Bulletin of Business Administration
39. James A. Lewis, 'New Objectives for CFIUS: Foreign Ownership, Critical Infrastructure, and Communications Interception' (2005) 57 Federal Communications Law Journal
40. Jari Ramon 'Building lawful Interception Capabilities: need for Legal Safeguards (2009) 2(3) International Journal of Private Law
41. James A. Lewis, "New Objectives for CFIUS: Foreign Ownership, Critical Infrastructure, and Communications Interception" (2005) 57 Federal Communications Law Journal
42. The British Chambers of Commerce' The Economic Impact of The Regulation of Investigatory Power (2000) http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/4117/1/4117.pdf at 5 September 2009
43. Telecommunications system have been defined in TIA Act s 5(1) as '(a) a telecommunication network that is within Australia; or (b) a telecommunications network that is partly within Australia, but only to the extent that the network is within Australia; and includes equipment, a line or other facility that is connected to such a network and within Australia.
44. Telecommunication Interception and Access Act s 6 (1)
45. Anthony Blunn, 'Report of the review of the regulation of access to communications' (Australian Government Attorney-General's Department, 2005)
46. TIA Act s 7 (1)
47. O'Malley v Keelty, Australian Federal Police Commissioner (2004) FCA 1688 at [2].
48. Tom Sherman, Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979: Report of Review of Named Person Warrants and Other Matters (Public Affairs Unit, Australian Government Attorney-General's Department,2003)
49. TIA s 105 (2)
50. Tom Sherman, 'Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979: Report of Review of Named Person Warrants and Other Matters' (Public Affairs Unit, Australian Government Attorney-General's Department,2003)
51. Attorney-General's Department, Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979- Report for the Year Ending 30 June 2005 Publication No 4321.
52. TIA Act s 7(4)
53. TIA Act s 7(5)
54. TIA Act s 9 (a)
55. TIA s 109
56. Electronic Frontiers Australia, Telecommunications Interception and Access Laws (2006) http://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Privacy/tia.html#defin at 3 November 2009
57. Thomas Wong, 'Regulation of Interception of Communications in Selected Jurisdictions' (2005) Research and Library Services Division Legislative Council Secretariat,Hong Kong
58. O'Malley v Keelty, Australian Federal Police Commissioner (2004) FCA 1688 at [2].
59. Marriage of Parker and Williams (1993) 117 FLR 1
60. Rob Nicholls and Michelle Rowland, "Lost in Transcription: The Australian Regime for Interception of, and Access to, Communications Content and Metadata", (2008) Record of The Communications Policy & Research Forum held in Sydney, September 29-30, 2008, Network Insight Institute, pp. 390-401
61. TIA Act s 9
62. TIA Act s 11(b)
63. Telecommunications device means "a terminal device that is capable of being used for transmitting or receiving a communication over a telecommunications system'.
64. See TIA Act s 5
65. TIA s 9 (a)
66. Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2006 - Explanatory Memorandum, circulated by the Australian Government Attorney General's Department, Canberra 2006. (Referenced as Explanatory Memorandum 2006)
67. TIA Act s 50 (3)
68. TIA Act s 9 (b)
69. The Attorney-General is the minister responsible for police, legal affairs and the Australian Security Organisation (ASIO). The Attorney -General is appointed by the Prime Minister who is the leader of the party in the House of Representatives.
70. TIA Act s 10 (a)
71. TIA Act s 10
72. TIA Act Pt 2.5
73. TIA Act s 6 (DA) 1
74. TIA Act s 6 (DA) 2
75. Grollo v Palmer (1995) 184 CLR 348.
76. 82 A Crim R 547.
77. TIA Act s 35
78. Attorney-General's Department, Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979- Report for the Year Ending 30 June 2005 Publication No 4321.
79. TIA Act s 11 A,B and C
80. The Amendment TIA Act 2006 removed the difference between class 1 and class 2 offences- both classes of offencesbecome serious offences
81. TIA Act s 5 D
82. Attorney-General's Department, Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979- Report for the Year Ending 30 June 2009.
83. TIA Act s 5 D
84. Jordanian Department of Statistics, (2007) Information Technology use at home survey www.dos.gov.jo at 8 August 2008
85. US State Department Human Rights Report 2006 - Jordan, at http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78855.htm. 28 February 2009
86. Jordanian Telecommunication Law(1995) S 56
87. Ibid at S 76
88. Ibid at S 71
89. Ibid at S 77
90. Lebanon telecommunication Act S 1
91. www.alarab.com.qa/detaials