Bayesian network analysis as a tool for efficient EOR screening

Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference 2011, EORC 2011

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 111-126

  Zerafat, M M ^a   Ayatollahi, Sh ^a   Mehranbod, N ^a   Barzegari, D ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPUTER SYSTEM RECOVERY; DATA MINING; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EXPERT SYSTEMS; FLOODS; FLOW OF FLUIDS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; OIL FIELDS; OIL WELL FLOODING; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS; POROUS MATERIALS; RESERVOIRS (WATER);

BASIC THEORY; CARBONATE RESERVOIR; FIELD EXPERIENCE; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; LEARNING TECHNIQUES; MULTI-PHASE FLUID FLOW; RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTIC; RESERVOIR SIMULATION;

ENHANCED RECOVERY;

EID: 80755180711     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2118/143282-ms     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Abbaspour, K., Matta, V., Huggenberger, P., Johnson, C.A., 2000. A contaminated site investigation: comparison of information gained from geophysical measurements and hydro-geological modeling, J. Contaminant Hydrology. 40, 365-380.
2. th Oct.
3. th Oct.
4. th Dec.
5. th European Petroleum Conf., Aberdeen, U.K., 29-31.
6. Aminzadeh,F., 2005. Applications of AI and soft computing for challenging problems in the oil industry, J. Pet. Sci. & Eng., 47, 5-14. (Pubitemid 40579188)
7. Biedermann, A., Taroni, F., Delemont, O., Semadeni, C., Davison, A.C., 2005. The evaluation of evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents. Part II. Practical examples of the use of Bayesian networks, Forensic Science International, 147, 59-69. (Pubitemid 39488111)
8. rd Joint SPE/DOE Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, SPE of AIME, Dallas, TX, 367-379.
9. Carter, J.N., Ballester, P.J., Tavassoli, Z., King, P.R., 2006. Our calibrated model has poor predictive value: An example from the petroleum industry, Reliability Eng. & Sys. Safety. 91, 1373-1381.
10. De Cristo, M.A.P., Calado, P.P., Silva, M.L.S.I., Muntz, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B., 2003. Bayesian belief networks for IR, International J. Approximate Reasoning. 34, 163-179.
11. Ferraresi, M., Todinia, E., Vignolib, R., 1996. A solution to the inverse problem in groundwater hydrology based on kalman filtering, J. of Hydrology. 175, 567-581.
12. Ghabayen, S.M.S., McKee, M., Kemblowski, M., 2006. Ionic and isotopic ratios for identification of salinity sources and missing data in the gaza aquifer, J. of Hydrology. 318, 360-373. (Pubitemid 43120805)
13. th
14. Guerillot, D.R., 1983. EOR Screening With an Expert System, SPE 17791
15. th March
16. Klins, M.A., 1984. Carbon Dioxide Flooding: Basic Mechanisms and Project Design, International Human Resources Development Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, 267-275.
17. Korb, K.B., Nicholson, A.E., 2004. Bayesian artificial intelligence, Chapman & Hall/CRC
18. th Oct.
19. Lee, C.J., Lee, K.J., 2005. Application of bayesian network to the probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear waste disposal, Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 9, 1-18.
20. Mathiassen, O. M., CO2 as Injection Gas for Enhanced Oil Recovery and Estimation of the Potential on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Pet. Eng. & App. Geophy.
21. Mohaghegh, Sh.D., Richardson, M., Ameri, S., 2001. Use of intelligent systems in reservoir characterization via synthetic magnetic resonance logs, J. Pet. Sci. & Eng. 29, 189-204. (Pubitemid 32497578)
22. Mohaghegh, Sh.D., 2005. A new methodology for the identification of best practices in the oil and gas industry using intelligent systems, J. Pet. SCi. & Eng. 49, 239-260.
23. Morooka, C.K., Guilherme, I.R., Mendes, J.R.P., 2001. Development of intelligent systems for well drilling and petroleum production, (2001). 32, 191-199.
24. Neapolitan, R.E., 1990. Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Theory and Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
25. Parkinson, W.J., Luger, G.F., Bretz, R.E., Osowski, J., 1994. Using an expert system to explore enhanced oil recovery methods, com. elect. Eng. 20, 2, 181-197.
26. nd Ed.
27. th March
28. Rolon, L., Mohaghegh, Sh. D., Ameri, S., Gaskari, R., McDaniel, B., 2009. Using artificial neural networks to generate synthetic well logs, J. Natural Gas Sci. & Eng. 1, 118-133.
29. Romero, C.E., Carter, J.N., 2001. Using genetic algorithms for reservoir characterization, J. Pet. Sci. & Eng. 31, 113-123 (Pubitemid 34034441)
30. Sayyad Amin, J., Alamdari, A., Mehranbod, N., Ayatollahi, Sh., Nikooee, E., 2010. Prediction of Asphaltene Precipitation: Learning from Data at Different Conditions, Energy & Fuels. 24, 4046-4053.
31. Spiegelhalter, D.J., Dawid, A.Ph., Lauritzen, S.L., Cowell, R.G., 1993. Bayesian analysis in expert systems, Stat. Sci. 8, 3,219-283.
32. th Oct.
33. Taber, J.J., Martin, F.D., Seright, R.S., 1997. EOR Screening Criteria Revisited - Part 1: Introduction to Screening Criteria and Enhanced Recovery Field Projects, SPE 35385, SPE Reservoir Engineering Journal, 189-198.
34. Enhanced Oil Recovery Potential in the United States, 1978. Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States, NTIS Order # PB-276594; 12 Vols.
35. 1996 worldwide EOR survey, 1996. Oil & Gas J. 94, 16, 45.
36. 1998 worldwide EOR survey, 1998. Oil & Gas J. 96, 16, 59.
37. 2002 worldwide EOR survey, 2002. Oil & Gas J. 100, 15, 71.
38. 2004 worldwide EOR survey, 2004. Oil & Gas J. 102, 14, 53.
39. 2006 worldwide EOR survey, 2006. Oil & Gas J. 104, 15, 45.