Daily MODIS data trends of hurricane-induced forest impact and early recovery

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 77, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1133-1143

  Ramsey, Elijah ^a   Spruce, Joseph ^b   Rangoonwala, Amina ^c,d   Suzuoki, Yukihiro ^e,f   Smoot, James ^b   Gasser, Jerry ^g   Bannister, Terri ^c,d  

^a NATIONAL WETLANDS RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b Stennis Space Center ^*  (United States)

^c Five Rivers Services LLC   (United States)

^d IAP World Services   (United States)

^e Japan Space Imaging Corporation   (Japan)

^f AScI Corporation   (United States)

^g STENNIS SPACE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HARDWOODS; HURRICANES; RADIOMETERS; RECOVERY; SPACE-BASED RADAR; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR; WETLANDS;

BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD FORESTS; HARDWOOD FORESTS; HURRICANE KATRINA; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; MODERATE RESOLUTION IMAGING SPECTRORADIOMETER SENSORS; PHENOLOGICAL TRENDS; TAXODIUM DISTICHUM; VEGETATION INDEX;

REFORESTATION;

DATA SET; DISTURBANCE; EVERGREEN FOREST; FOREST CANOPY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; HURRICANE; INVASIVE SPECIES; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; MODIS; PHENOLOGY; RADARSAT; REGENERATION; REPLACEMENT; SATELLITE DATA; SENSOR; SWAMP; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR; TREND ANALYSIS; VEGETATION INDEX;

HARDWOODS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; RADAR; RADIOMETRY; RECOVERY; REFORESTATION; SATELLITES; WETLANDS;

CUPRESSUS; NYSSA AQUATICA; TAXODIUM DISTICHUM;

EID: 80755159464     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/pers.77.11.1133     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ackerman, S., R. Holz, R. Frey, E. Eloranta, B. Maddux, and M. McGill, 2008. Cloud detection with MODIS, Part II: Validation, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 25(7): 1073-1086.
2. Anderson, E., D. Sweeney, and T. Williams, 1984. Statistics for Business and Economics, West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minnesota, 708 p.
3. Bevington, P., 1969. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 336 p.
4. Bradley, A., R. Jacob, J. Hermance, and J. Mustard, 2007. A curve fitting procedure to derive inter-annual phenologies from time series of noisy satellite NDVI data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 106:137-145.
5. Chambers, J., J. Fisher, H. Zeng, E. Chapman, D. Baker, and G. Hurtt, 2007. Hurricane Katrina's carbon footprint on U.S. Gulf Coast forests, Science, 318(5853):1107.
6. Chen, J., P. Jönsson, M. Tamura, Z. Gu, B. Matsushita, and L. Eklundh, 2004. A simple method for reconstructing a highquality NDVI time-series data set based on the Savitzky-Golay filter, Remote Sensing of Environment, 91:332-344.
7. Fisher, J., and J. Mustard, 2007. Cross-scalar satellite phenology from ground, Landsat, and MODIS data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 109:261-273.
8. Frey, R., S. Ackerman, Y. Liu, K. Strabala, H. Zhang, J. Key, and X. Wang, 2008. Cloud detection with MODIS, Part I: Improvements in the MODIS cloud mask for collection 5, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 25(7):1057-1072.
9. Gao, F., J. Morisette, R. Wolfe, G. Ederer, J. Pedelty, E. Masuoka, R. Myneni, B. Tan, and J. Nightingale, 2008. An algorithm to produce temporally and spatially continuous MODIS-LAI time series, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 5:60-64.
10. Jönsson, P., and L. Eklundh, 2004. TIMESAT - A program for analyzing time-series of satellite sensor data, Computers and Geosciences, 30:833-845.
11. Huete, A, C Justice, and W. van Leeuwen. 1999. MODIS vegetation index (MOD 13) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, Version 3, Available at: http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/atbd/atbd_ mod13.pdf (last date accessed: 22 July 2011).
12. Klemas, V., 2005. Resolution requirements for coastal applications of new geostationary satellites, Proceedings of OCEANS-05, Washington, D.C. 20-24 September 2005.
13. Lunetta, R., J. Knight, J. Ediriwickrema, J. Lyon, and L. Worthy, 2006. Landcover change detection using multi-temporal MODIS NDVI data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 105:142-154.
14. McKellip, R., R. Ryan, D. Prados, and S. Blonski, 2005. Crop surveillance demonstration using a near-daily MODIS vegetation index time series, Proceedings of the 2005 International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Images, IEEE, New York, pp. 54-58.
15. McKellip, R., D. Prados, R. Ryan, K. Ross, J. Spruce, G. Gasser, and R. Greer, 2008. Remote-sensing time series analysis, a vegetation monitoring tool, NASA Tech Briefs, 32(4):63-64.
16. Middleton, B., 2009. Regeneration of coastal marsh vegetation impacted by Hurricane Katrina, Wetlands, 29:54-65.
17. PCI Geomatics. 1998. Using PCI Software, Version 6.3 EASZIPACE, PCI Geomatics, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada (software documentation).
18. Ramsey, E. III, D. Chappell, and D. Baldwin, 1997. AVHRR imagery used to identify Hurricane Andrew damage in a forested wetland of Louisiana, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 63(3):293-297.
19. Ramsey, E. III, D. Chappell, D.M. Jacobs, S.K. Sapkota, and D.G. Baldwin, 1998. Resource management of forested wetlands: Hurricane impact and recovery mapped by combining Landsat TM and NOAA AVHRR data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 64(7):733-738.
20. Ramsey, E. III, M. Hodgson, S. Sapkota, and G. Nelson, 2001. Forest impact estimated with NOAA AVHRR and Landsat TM data related to an empirical hurricane wind-field distribution, Remote Sensing of Environment, 77(3):279-292.
21. Ramsey E. III, A. Rangoonwala, and R. Ehrlich, 2005. Mapping the invasive species, Chinese Tallow with EO1 satellite Hyperion hyperspectral image data and relating tallow percent occurrences to a classified Landsat Thematic Mapper landcover map, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(8):1637-1657.
22. Ramsey, E. III, Z. Lu., A. Rangoonwala, and R. Rykhus, 2006. Multiple baseline radar interferometry applied to coastal landscape classification and change analyses, GIS Science and Remote Sensing, 43(4):283-309.
23. Ramsey, E. III, A. Rangoonwala, B. Middleton, and Z. Lu, 2009a. Satellite optical and radar image data used to track wetland forest impact and short-term recovery from Hurricane Katrina, Wetlands, 29(1):66-79.
24. Ramsey, E. III, D. Werle, Z. Lu, A. Rangoonwala, and Y. Suzuoki, 2009b. A case of timely satellite image acquisitions in support of coastal emergency environmental response management, Journal of Coastal Research, 25(5):1168-1172.
25. Reed, B., J. Brown, D. VanderZee, T. Loveland, J. Merchant, and D. Ohlen, 1994. Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery, Journal of Vegetation Science, 5:703-714.
26. Savitzky, A., and M. Golay, 1964. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures, Analytical Chemistry, 36:1627-1639.
27. Spruce, J.P., S. Sader, R.E. Ryan, J. Smoot, P. Kuper, K. Ross, D. Prados, J. Russell, G. Gasser, R. McKellip, and W. Hargrove. 2011. Assessment of MODIS NDVI time series data products for detecting forest defoliation by gypsy moth outbreaks, Remote Sensing of Environment, 115:427-437.
28. Streiner, D., 1996. Maintaining standards: Differences between the standard deviation and standard error, and when to use each, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 41:498-502.
29. Tucker, J., 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation, Remote Sensing of Environment, 8:127-150.
30. White, D., 1983. Plant communities of the lower Pearl River basin, Louisiana, American Midland Naturalist, 110:381-96.
31. White, M., and R. Nemani, 2006. Real-time monitoring and shortterm forecasting of land surface phenology, Remote Sensing of Environment, 104(1):43-49.
32. Xiong, X., and W. Barnes, 2006. An overview of MODIS radiometric calibration and characterization, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 23(1):69-79.
33. Zhang, X., M. Friedl, C. Schaaf, A. Strahler, J. Hodges, F. Gao, B. Reed, and A. Huete, 2003. Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS, Remote Sensing of Environment, 84:471-475.
34. Zhang, X., M. Friedl, and C. Schaaf, 2006. Global vegetation phenology from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS): Evaluation of global patterns and comparison with in situ measurements, Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, pp. G04017, DOI:10.1029/2006JG00217.